Abstract
This paper sets out to examine political thinking in post-totalitarian Slovakia. Using the discourse theory and signification of Laclau and Mouffe, it considers the sign národ (a specific conception of the Slovak nation) in relation to democracy and the EU. Seeking to pinpoint political thinking amongst the general populace, it bases its analysis on an examination of newspaper articles on “Building the State” published in the 1990s. It traces the roots of the sign from the 1960s to the present day and predicts that the EU signifier will impact on the content of the floating signifier of národ.
[1] Bugge, P. The Making of a Slovak City: The Czechoslovak Renaming of Pressburg/Pozsony/Presporok, 1918–19. Austrian History Yearbook 35, 205–227, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0067237800020993Search in Google Scholar
[2] Červenák, A. V práci a pokore prijímam republiku. Republika. 4 October 1993. Search in Google Scholar
[3] Dokumenty slovenskej národnej identity a štátnosti 1. Bratislava: Národné literárne centrum, 1998. Search in Google Scholar
[4] Ďurica, M. S. Priblížíŧ sa k pravde. Reakcie na stanovisko Historického ústavu SAV k mojej knihe Dejiny Slovenska a Slovákov. Bratislava: Media Trade, 1998 Search in Google Scholar
[5] Goldfarb, G. C. Beyond Glasnost: The Post-Totalitarian Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991. Search in Google Scholar
[6] Hanus, M. Sólyom a Fico: ako u bláznov. Týždeň 16 March 2010. Search in Google Scholar
[7] Eurobarometer 74: verejná mienka v Európskej únii. Jeseň 2010. Retrieved from Zhttp://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb74/eb74_sk_sk_nat.pdf on 5 March 2011. Search in Google Scholar
[8] Haughton, T., Rybář, M. A Change of Direction: The 2006 Parliamentary Elections and Party Politics in Slovakia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 232–255, 2008. Search in Google Scholar
[9] Henderson, K. Experts or Novices? The Prospects for the New Slovak Government. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2010. Search in Google Scholar
[10] Henderson, K. Euroscepticism or Europhobia? Opposition Attitudes to the EU in Slovakia. SCI Working Paper 50, 2001. Search in Google Scholar
[11] Howarth, D., Stavrakakis, Y. Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. In D. Howarth, A.J. Norval, Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. Search in Google Scholar
[12] Kenney, P. A Carnival of Revolution: Central Europe 1989. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002. Search in Google Scholar
[13] Laclau, E. Power and Social Communication. Ethical Perspectives 7, 139–145, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/EP.7.2.503799Search in Google Scholar
[14] Lukáč, P. Historická a politická identita Slovenska na prahu jeho integrácie do EÚ. Slovenská otázka dnes: výber textov z časopisu OS 1997–2006. Bratislava: Kalligram, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
[15] Marušiak, J. Fenomén strany Smer: medzi „pragmatizmom“ a sociálnou demokraciou. Central European Political Studies Review 2006. Search in Google Scholar
[16] Michaels, D. Revising the Nation Through Schooling: Citizenship and Belonging in Slovak Textbooks, 1918–2005. PhD thesis. University of Michigan. Retreived from http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64631/1/deborka_1.pdf on 5 March 2011. Search in Google Scholar
[17] Mináč, V. Tu žije národ. In V. Mináč. Vybrané spory. Bratislava: Národné literárne centrum, 1997. Search in Google Scholar
[18] Menzies, C. Statebuilding and the Phenomenon of Mečiarism. Unpublished PhD thesis. SEES University College London, 2004. Search in Google Scholar
[19] Nabers, D. Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy after September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis 5, 191–214, 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.xSearch in Google Scholar
[20] Nabers, D. Crisis, Hegemony and Change in the International System: A Conceptual Framework. GIGA Working Paper 50, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
[21] Norval, A. J. Trajectories of Future Research in Discourse Theory. In D. Howarth, A.J. Norval, Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. Search in Google Scholar
[22] O slovenské občianstvo prišlo 32 ľudí, najviac prijalo nemeckeé. Retrieved from http://www.sme.sk/c/5766454/o-slovenske-obcianstvo-prislo-32-ludi-najviac-prijalo-nemecke.html#ixzz1FBVw1otx on 27 March 2011. Search in Google Scholar
[23] Podoksik, E. Anti-totalitarian Ambiguities: Jacob Talmon and Michael Oakeshott. History of European Ideas 34, 206–219, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2007.12.009Search in Google Scholar
[24] Pynsent, R. Tinkering with the Ferkos: A Kind of Slovakness. Slavonic and East European Review 2, 279–295, 1998. Search in Google Scholar
[25] Salner, P. Premeny Bratislavy, 1939–1993. Bratislava: SAV, 1998. Search in Google Scholar
[26] Skilling, G. H. Samizdat and an Independent Society in Eastern and Central Europe. Houndmills: MacMillan Press, 1989. Search in Google Scholar
[27] Slobodník, D. Hra o Slovensku. Bratislava: Juga, 2000. Search in Google Scholar
[28] Slobodník, D. Proti sedemhlavému drakovi. Z dejín zápasu za Slovensko. Bratislava: Spolok slovenských spisovateľov, 1998. Search in Google Scholar
[29] Solivajsová, Z. Zo slobody vôle občanov. Republika. 4 October 1993. Search in Google Scholar
[30] Šrámek, Ľ. Publikum médií v roku1998. Otázky žurnalistiky, 1, 1991. Search in Google Scholar
[31] Torfing, J. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. Search in Google Scholar
© 2011 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
