References
Brandt, A. 2007. The cigarette century. The rise, fall and deadly persistence of a product that defined America. New York: Basic Books.
Caudill, D. 2005. Sociotechnical arguments in scientific discourse: Expert depositions in tobacco litigation. The Review of Litigation 24: 1–56.
Delafontaine, R. 2016. The judge and the historian. www.thejudgeandthehistorian.ugent.be/home/
De Baets, A. 2009. Responsible history. New York: Berghan Books.
Edmond, G. 2012. Advice for the courts? Sufficiently reliable assistance with forensic science and medicine (Part 2). International Journal of Evidence & Proof 16: 263–297.
Haberer, E. 2005. History and justice: Paradigms for the prosecution of Nazi crimes. Holocaust and Genocide Studies 19: 497–519.
Proctor, R. 2012. Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rosner, D., and G. Markowitz. 2009. The trial and tribulations of two historians: Adjudicating responsibility for pollution and personal harm. Medical History 53: 271–292.
Wijffels, A. 2001. History in court: Historical expertise and methods in a forensic context. Leiden: Ius Deco.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mercer, D. Trying objectivity. Metascience 25, 501–506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0111-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0111-8