Skip to main content
Log in

Trying objectivity

Ramses Delafontaine: Historians as expert judicial witnesses in tobacco litigation: a controversial legal practice. Series: studies in the history of law and justice 4: Series Editors: Mortimer Sellers. Georges Martyn. Springer, 2015, xxv+453pp, €129.99HB

  • Essay Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Brandt, A. 2007. The cigarette century. The rise, fall and deadly persistence of a product that defined America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, D. 2005. Sociotechnical arguments in scientific discourse: Expert depositions in tobacco litigation. The Review of Litigation 24: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delafontaine, R. 2016. The judge and the historian. www.thejudgeandthehistorian.ugent.be/home/

  • De Baets, A. 2009. Responsible history. New York: Berghan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmond, G. 2012. Advice for the courts? Sufficiently reliable assistance with forensic science and medicine (Part 2). International Journal of Evidence & Proof 16: 263–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberer, E. 2005. History and justice: Paradigms for the prosecution of Nazi crimes. Holocaust and Genocide Studies 19: 497–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. 2012. Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, D., and G. Markowitz. 2009. The trial and tribulations of two historians: Adjudicating responsibility for pollution and personal harm. Medical History 53: 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijffels, A. 2001. History in court: Historical expertise and methods in a forensic context. Leiden: Ius Deco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Mercer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mercer, D. Trying objectivity. Metascience 25, 501–506 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0111-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0111-8

Keywords

Navigation