Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A model for the Modern Malaise

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, A.R. and Belnap, N.D. Jr.,Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 1, Princeton U.P., Princeton, New Jersey, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer, R.K., “a Characteristic Matrix for RM”, Typescript, Bryn Mawr, 1968. (An edited version appears in [1] under the title “Sugihara is a Characteristic Matrix for RM”.)

  3. Sugihara, T., “Strict Implication Free from Implicational Paradoxes”,Memoirs of the Faculty of Liberal Arts, Fukui University, Series I, 55–59, 1955.

  4. Routley, R. and Meyer, R.K., “Semantics of Entailment (1)”, inTruth, Syntax and Modality, 199–243 ed. H. Leblanc, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, J.M., “Algebraic Completeness Results for R-mingle and its Extensions”,Journal of Symbolic Logic., 55 (1970), 1–13, (An edited version appears in [1].)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dunn, J.M., “A Kripke-Style Semantics for R-mingle using a Binary Accessibility Relation”,Studia Logica, 35 (1976), 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Routley, R., “Problems and Solutions in the Semantics of Quantified Relevant Logics 1”,Proceedings of the 4th Latin-America Symposium of Mathematical Logic, 305–340, edited by R. Chaugui et al., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer, R.K., Dunn, J.M. and Leblanc, H., “Completeness of Relevant Quantification Theories”,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic., 15 (1974), 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rasiowa, H. and Sikorski, R.The Mathematics of Metamathematics, Warsaw (Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe), Second Edition, Revised, 1968.

  10. Birkhoff, G.,Lattice Theory, Vol. 25, American Mathematical Colloquium Publications, Providence, Rhode Island, 3rd Edition, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, R.K., Routley, R. and Dunn, J.M., “Curry's Paradox”,Analysis 39 (1979), 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brady, R., “The Non-Triviality of Dialectical Set Theory”, inParaconsistent Logics, ed. G. Priest and R. Routley, Forthcoming.

  13. Belnap, N.D., “Intensional Models for First Degree formulas”,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 32 (1967), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia

    Robert K. Meyer & Adrian Abraham

Authors
  1. Robert K. Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adrian Abraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, R.K., Abraham, A. A model for the Modern Malaise. Philosophia 14, 25–40 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02378958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02378958

Search

Navigation