Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

E is a conservative extension of EĪ

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. A.R. Anderson, “Some open problems concerning the system E of entailment,”Acta Philosophical Fennica 16 (1963), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N.D. Belnap, Jr., and John R. Wallace, “A decision procedure for the system EĪ of entailment with negation,”Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 11 (1965), 277–89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.K. Meyer, “Entailment and relevant implication,”Logique et Analyse 11 (1968), 472–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Routley and R.K. Meyer, “The semantics of entailment II,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972), 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.R. Anderson, and N.D. Belnap, Jr.,Entailment, Princeton, 1974.

  6. R. Routley and R.K. Meyer, “The semantics of entailment IV,”The Journal of Symbolic Logic, forthcoming.

  7. Kit Fine, “Models for entailment,” forthcoming

  8. H.B. Curry,Foundations of Mathematical Logic, N.Y., 1963.

  9. Saul Kripke, “The problem of entailment,” abstract,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (1959), 324.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.K. Meyer, “Improved decision procedures for pure relevant logics,” in preparation.

  11. A. Church, “The weak theory of implication,” inKontrolliertes Denken, Munich, 1951. (Abstract, “Minimal logic,”The Journal of Symbolic Logic) 16 (1951), 239.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.B. Curry, Review of [11]“The weak theory of implication,”The Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (1953), 177, 326.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.K. Meyer,Topics in modal and many-valued logic, thesis, U. of Pittsburgh 1966.

  14. R.K. Meyer, “The pure calculus of entailment is the pure calculus of entailment,” typescript, 1971.

  15. R.K. Meyer, “New axiomatics for relevant logics I,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1974), 53–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Routley, and R.K. Meyer, “The semantics of entailment (I),” in H. Leblanc, ed.,Truth, Syntax, Modality, N. Holland, 1973.

  17. R.K. Meyer, and R. Routley, “Algebraic analysis of entailment I,”Logique et Analyse.

  18. R. Routley, and R.K. Meyer, “The semantics of entailment V,” typescript, 1972.

  19. R.K. Meyer, “Conservative extension in relevant implication,”Studia Logica.

  20. R.K. Meyer, “On conserving positive logics,”Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.

  21. R. Routley, and R.K. Meyer, “The semantics of entailment III,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972), 192–208.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.K. Meyer, “Coherence revisited,” typescript, 1972.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pittsburgh, 15213, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley

  2. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

    Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley

Authors
  1. Robert K. Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Routley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, R.K., Routley, R. E is a conservative extension of EĪ. Philosophia 4, 223–249 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379225

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379225

Keywords

Search

Navigation