Natural teleology and Kant’s duties to oneself as an animal being

Meyer, Daniel

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/108090 Copy

Description

Title

Natural teleology and Kant’s duties to oneself as an animal being

Author(s)

Meyer, Daniel

Issue Date

2020-03-09

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Sussman, David

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Sussman, David

Committee Member(s)

• Varden, Helga
• Murphy, Colleen
• Sanders, Kirk

Department of Study

Philosophy

Discipline

Philosophy

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• Philosophy
• Moral Philosophy
• Immanuel Kant
• Natural Teleology
• Duties to Oneself

Abstract

"In the ""Metaphysics of Morals,"" Kant appears to claim that there is a category of duties to oneself, known as the duties to oneself as animal beings, that is based in the natural teleology of the natural appetites (self-love, the desire for sex, and the desire for food). Commentators, rightly puzzled by these claims, have said that any appeal to natural teleology would be inconsistent with Kant’s account of the ground of the moral law, and also with Kant’s understanding of human beings as autonomous. As such, the duties to oneself as an animal being are typically given some sort of non-teleological explanation. I claim that such an explanation leads to conceptual and interpretive difficulties. In this dissertation I defend a teleological account of the duties to oneself as an animal being. I begin by explaining the duties to oneself as an animal being in the context of Kant’s moral psychology and his account of human nature. The duties to oneself as an animal being are properly understood as limiting one’s actions only in cases where one acts to satisfy a natural appetite. Kant’s understanding of natural appetite satisfaction, moreover, is teleological from the outset. The feeling of pleasure and displeasure, according to Kant, just is an awareness of some condition as agreeing or disagreeing with one’s life. Because natural appetite satisfaction is teleological from the beginning, Kant’s appeal to natural teleology in the account of the duties to oneself as an animal being does not involve the introduction of some external or heteronomous commitment."

Graduation Semester

2020-05

Type of Resource

Thesis

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/108090

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2020 Daniel Meyer

Owning Collections