References
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1954) ‘Remarks on Carnap'sLogical Syntax of Language’, inAspects of Language, Magnes Press, Jerusalem, 1970.
Fraser, C. (1966) Discussion in J. Lyons & R.J. Wales, eds.,Psycholinguistic Papers, Edinburgh University Press.
Kasher, A. (1972) ‘Sentences and utterances reconsidered’.FL 8.313–45.
Lighthill, Sir James,et al., (1973)Artificial Intelligence: a paper symposium. Science Research Council, London.
Orgass, R.J. & ‘A theory of programming languages’,Studium Generale 22. 113–36.
Putnam, H. (1967) ‘The “innateness hypothesis” and explanatory models in linguistics’.Synthese 17.12ff.
Quine, W. van O. (1953) ‘Two dogmas of empiricism’, inFrom a Logical Point of View, 2nd. ed., Harper & Row, New York, 1961.
Ross, J.R. (1970) ‘On dcclarative sentences’. R.A. Jacobs & P.S. Rosenbaum, eds.,Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham (Mass.).
Sampson, G.R. (1972) ‘Can language be explained functionally?’Synthese 23.477–86.
Turing, A.M. (1950) ‘Computing machinery and intelligence’.Mind 59.433–60.
Winograd, T. (1972) ‘Understanding natural language’,Cognitive Psychology 3.1–191.
References
Gödel, K.: The consistency of the axiom of choice and of the generalized continuum hypothesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences &U.S.A.) 24 (1938), 556–557.
Kreisel, G.: Observation on Popular Discussions of Foundations.Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. XIII Axiomatic Set Theory, Part 1 (1971), 189–198
References
Hajek, P.: Contributions to the theory of semisets I,Zeitschr. f. math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math. 18 (1972), p. 241–248.
Hajek, P.: Why Semisets?.Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae, 14 (1973), p. 397–420.
Rosser, J.B.:Simplified independence proofs — Boolean valued models of set theory, Academic Press 1969.
Scott, D.S. and R. Solovay:Boolean valued models of set theory, to appear.
Schoenfield, J.R.: Unrammified forcing,Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Volume XIII — Axiomatic Set Theory, Part 1 (1971), p. 357–381.
Takeuti G. and W.M. Zaring:Axiomatic Set Theory, Springer-Verlag 1973.
Vopenka, P.: General Theory of Δ-models,Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae, 8 (1967), p. 145–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brody, B., Swinburne, R.G., Michalos, A.C. et al. Book reviews. Philosophia 4, 351–439 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379235
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379235