Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Monster of Supercapitalism

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among other interesting claims made in Robert Reich’s 2007 treatise, Supercapitalism, it is asserted in various ways that proponents of corporate social responsibility (CSR) or what I would call ‘business ethics’ are engaged in relatively unproductive exercises. Their resources would be better used if they undertook the hard work of engagement in democratic political processes leading to legislation that would force corporations to pursue the public interest as well as their own. In this article, I summarize some of Reich’s central theses and arguments, show that they are fatally flawed and explain why the institution of morality is essential for business, law and democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Jackson, A.: 2008, “Canada needs stronger unions to close the growing gap”, The CCPA Monitor, 15(2), p.9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and F. Engels: 1849, The Communist Manifesto (London).

  • Michalos, A.C.: 1980, North American Social Report, Volume Two: Crime, Justice and Politics, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C.: 1992, “Ethical considerations in evaluation”, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 7, pp.61-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C.: 1995, A Pragmatic Approach to Business Ethics, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C.: 2008, “Ancient observations on business ethics: Middle East meets West”, Journal of Business Ethics, 79 (1-2), pp.9-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C.: 2008a, Trade Barriers to the Public Good: Free Trade and Environmental Protection, McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K., L. Swystun, B. Holden and H. Bernardin: 2008, Final Report for the Democratic Engagement Domain, Prairie Wild Consulting and Holden and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., F.L. Schmidt and S.L. Rynes: 2003, “Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis”, Organization Studies, 24(3), pp.403-441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M.: 2008, ‘Why Corporations Should Not Abandon Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 83(4), 805–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy and society’, Harvard Business Review December, 78–92.

  • Putnam, R.D.: 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R.B.: 2007, Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, A.W. and K. Weber (2006) The Triple Bottom Line. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.: 2006, The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, C., S. Keeter, M. Andolina, K. Jenkins and M. Carpini: 2006, A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Michalos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michalos, A.C. The Monster of Supercapitalism. J Bus Ethics 91 (Suppl 1), 37–48 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0566-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0566-2

Keywords

Navigation