Abstract
A growing body of literature places blame for accounting frauds on the failure of educators to implement ethics training in accounting curriculums in higher educational institutions. Although, the professional accountancy bodies in the UK espouse high ethical standards, others suggest that these bodies are failing to cover ethics in any meaningful way. This study surveys faculty about what is being taught and how much time is dedicated to ethics training. This is the first study to examine whether content suggested by the Ethics Education Framework (EEF) has been implemented in curriculums in the UK. In addition, we look to determine if there is a notable difference between what is covered in both pre-1992 (less vocational) and post-1992 (more vocational) UK universities. Although we find that post-1992 (more vocational) institutions have implemented the EEF suggestions more than pre-1992 (less vocational) UK universities, current ethics training is insufficient and has not changed much over the last two decades.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There are six major Professionalizing Accountancy bodies in the UK, each having their own curriculum and examinations that students must complete. They are: 1. ACCA: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants; 2. CIMA: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants; 3. CIPFA: The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy; 4. ICAEW: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales; 5. ICAI: Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland; and, 6. ICAS: Institute of Chartered Accountants in Scotland.
A four-stage ethical content curricular framework developed by Cooper et al. (2008) based off the 2004 Ethics Education Task Force (AACSB, 2004) and the International Accounting Education Standards Board (IAESB), a standard-setting body of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). The framework was commissioned by the Education Committee of IFAC (now the IAESB), specifically for the ethics education of accountants.
Pre-1992 universities are older-established universities that often have a heavier concentration in traditional academic subjects (natural sciences and humanities), while post-1992 universities are ex-polytechnics that were granted full university status in 1992 and tend to have stronger vocational roots. “The post-1992 universities have stronger ties with professional bodies and might be expected to follow more closely the lead given by professional body curricula, whereas the pre-1992 universities have a tradition of independence in curricular design” (Ghaffari et al. 2008, p. 187).
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) is an independent body entrusted with monitoring and advising on standards and quality in UK higher education.
Since UK professional accountancy bodies offer exemptions from some of their examinations to graduates, they influence the curricular offerings of UK University accounting programmes. The offering of exemptions is one way accounting programmes in the UK market themselves to potential students. If these bodies were to include or increase the amount of ethics in their respective syllabi, accounting programmes would be incented to do the same.
References
Armstrong, M. B. (1987). Moral development and accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education, 5, 27–43.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International. (2004). Ethics education in business schools: Report of the ethics education task force to AACSB international’s board of directors. St. Louis, MO: AACSB.
Bampton, R., & Cowton, C. (2013). Taking stock of accounting ethics scholarship: A review of the journal literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 549–563.
Bean, D., & Bernardi, R. (2005). Accounting ethics courses: A professional necessity. The CPA Journal, 75, 64–65.
Blanthorne, C., Kovar, S. E., & Fisher, D. G. (2007). Accounting educators’ opinions about ethics in the curriculum: An extensive view. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), 355–390.
Christensen, A., Cote, J., & Latham, C. (2016). Insights regarding the applicability of the defining issues test to advance ethics research with accounting students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 141–163.
Cole, B., & Smith, D. (1996). Perceptions of business ethics: Students vs. business people. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 889–896.
Cooper, B. J., Leung, P., Dellaportas, S., Jackling, B., & Wong, G. (2008). Ethics education for accounting students—A toolkit approach. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 17(4), 405–430.
Cowton, C., & Cummins, J. (2003). Teaching business ethics in UK higher education: Progress and prospects. Teaching Business Ethics, 7, 37–54.
Dellaportas, S., Jackling, B., Leung, P., & Cooper, B. J. (2011). Developing an ethics education framework for accounting. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8, 63–82.
Elson, R., & Williams, J. (2010). The challenges and opportunities of incorporating accounting ethics into the accounting curriculum. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 13, 105–115.
Fleming, A. I. M. (1996). Ethics and accounting education in the UK—A professional approach? Accounting Education, 5, 207–217.
Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision-making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205–221.
Ghaffari, F., Kyriacou, O., & Ross, B. (2008). Exploring the implementation of ethics in U.K. accounting programs. Issues in Accounting Education, 23, 183–198.
Graham, A. (2012). The teaching of ethics in undergraduate accounting programmes: The students’ perspective. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 21(6), 599–613.
Hiltebeitel, K. M., & Jones, S. K. (1991). Initial Evidence on the Impact of Integrating Ethics into Accounting Education Issues. Accounting Education, 6(2), 262–276.
Hiltebeitel, K. M., & Jones, S. K. (1992). An assessment of ethics instruction in accounting education. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 37–46.
International Federation of Accountants. (2006). Approaches to the development and maintenance of professional values, ethics and attitudes in accounting education programs. Retrieved 30 September 2016 from https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/files/2297.pdf.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.
Lampe, J. (1996). The impact of ethics in accounting curricula. Research on Accounting Ethics, 2, 187–220.
Loe, T. W., Farrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision-making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.
Luthar, H., & Kari, R. (2005). Exposure to ethics and the perception of linkage between organizational ethical behavior and business outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 353–368.
Macfarlane, B., & Ottewill, R. (2004). Business ethics in the curriculum: Assessing the evidence from U.K. Subject Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 339–347.
Massey, D., & Van Hise, J. (2009). Walking the walk: Integrating lessons from multiple perspectives in the development of an accounting ethics capstone., 24(4), 481–510.
Miller, W., & Becker, D. (2011). Ethics in the accounting curriculum: What is really being covered? American Journal of Business Education, 4, 1–10.
Miller, W., Becker, D., & Pernsteiner, A. (2014). The accounting ethics course reconsidered. Global Perspectives in Accounting Education, 11, 77–99.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.
Ponemon, L. (1993). The influence of ethical reasoning on auditor’s perceptions of management’s integrity and competence. Advances in Accounting, 11, 1–29.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger.
Russell, A., & Smith, C. (2003). Accounting education’s role in corporate malfeasance: It’s time for a new curriculum! IMA Strategic Finance, 85, 47–51.
Sadowski, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). Toward a convergence of global ethics standards: A model from the professional field of accountancy. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3, 14–20.
Shawver, T. J. (2009). Can ethics and professional responsibility be taught to accounting students? Journal of Business Disciplines, 10(1), 1–26.
Sikka, P., Haslam, C., Kyriacou, O., & Agrizzi, D. (2007). Professionalizing claims and the state of UK professional accounting education: Some evidence. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 1, 3–21.
St. Pierre, K., Nelson, E., & Gabbin, A. (1990). A study of the ethical development of accounting majors in relation to other business and non-business disciplines. The Accounting Educators’ Journal (Summer), 23–35.
Swanson, D., & Fisher, D. (2008). Business ethics education: If we don’t where were going, any road will take us there. In D. Swanson & D. Fisher (Eds.), Advancing business ethics education (pp. 1–23). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.
Uysal, Ö. Ö. (2010). Business ethics research with an accounting focus: A bibliometric analysis from 1988 to 2007. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 137–160.
Funding
This study received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendices
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, W.F., Shawver, T.J. An Exploration of the State of Ethics in UK Accounting Education. J Bus Ethics 153, 1109–1120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3396-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3396-z