Skip to main content
Log in

Critiquing a Critique

A Comment on “A Critique of Positive Responsibility in Computing”

  • Comment
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Stieb, J. A. (2008). A critique of positive responsibility in computing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lorenz, E. (1996). The essence of chaos (pp. 14–15). University of Washington Press.

  3. Gotterbarn, D. (1995). The moral responsibility of software developers: Three levels of professional software engineering. The Journal of Information Ethics, 4(1), 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rand, A. (1961). The virtue of selfishness. New York: Signet.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bynum, T. W., & Rogerson, S. (Eds.). (2004). Computer ethics and professional responsibility. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, K. (1998). Software informed consent: Docete emptorem, not caveat emptor. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(3), 357–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGibbon, T., & Nicholls, D. (2002). Making the (business) case for software reliability, Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. Proceedings. Annual, pp. 285–292.

  8. Flor, N. V., Lerch, F. J., & Hong, S. (1999). A market-driven approach to teaching software components engineering. Annals of Software Engineering, 6(1–4), 223–251.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, K., & Moor, J. (2008). The ethics of spam. In K. Himma & H. Tavani (Eds.), Handbook of information and computer ethics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith W. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, K.W. Critiquing a Critique. Sci Eng Ethics 14, 245–249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9072-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9072-7

Keywords

Navigation