Abstract
This commentary examines the ethics and law in the United States as they relate to the foregoing of life sustaining treatment when such treatment is deemed medically inappropriate. In particular the article highlights the procedural approach when there is disagreement between physicians and surrogates or patients as exemplified in Texas Law. This approach, although worthy in concept, may in practice invite opposition and dissatisfaction as it may be perceived as coercive and pitting the weak against powerful adversaries and interests, in addition to discouraging the exercise of professional virtues. Too inflexible an approach erodes trust, and furthermore the Texas law allows hospital ethics committees to move from an advisory non judgmental role to a quasi legal court with real legal power but no credentialing or oversight.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, Todd. 2005. Burial set for man at center of debate over life support. Houston Chronicle. June 3.
Ackerman, Todd. 2006. Families urge change to state futile-care law. Houston Chronicle. August 10.
Baylor Health Care System.Media Statement: Tirhas Habtegiris. www.baylorhealth.com/aboutus/press/2006/011606.htm.
Bernat, J.L. 2001. Ethical and legal issues in palliative care. Neurologic Clinics 19: 969–987. doi:10.1016/S0733-8619(05)70056-6.
Brodie, Stephen G., Hiroshi Kitoh, Mark Lipson, Mara Sifry-Platt, and William R. Wilcox. 1998. Thanatophoric dysplasia type 1 with syndactyly. American Journal of Medical Genetics 80: 260–262. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19981116)80:3<260::AID-AJMG15>3.0.CO;2-S
Brody, H. 1994. The physician’s role in determining futility. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 42: 875–878.
Buggs, Simon. 2005. Preparing for life’s end relevant now. Houston Chronicle. March 28.
Burt, R.A. 2003. Resolving disputes between clinicians and family about “futility” of treatment. Seminars in Perinatology 27: 495–502. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2003.10.009.
Capron, A.M. 1995. Abandoning a waning life. The Hastings Center Report 25: 24–26. doi:10.2307/3562158.
Casarett, D., and M. Siegler. 1999. Unilateral do-not-attempt resuscitation orders and ethics consultation: a case series. Critical Care Medicine 27: 1116–1120. doi:10.1097/00003246-199906000-00031.
Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 US 261, 110 SCt 2841 (1990).
Fine, Robert L., and Thomas W. Mayo. 2003. Resolution of futility by due process: early experience with the Texas Advanced Directives Act. Annals of Internal Medicine 138: 743–746.
Fleming David, A. 2005. Futility: revisiting a concept of shared moral judgment. HEC Forum 17: 260–275. doi:10.1007/s10730-005-5153-z.
Frank, R.H. 2006. Weighing the true costs and benefits in a matter of life and death. New York Times, January 19.
Gilgunn v Massachusetts General Hospital No 92 -420 Mass Super Ct Civ Action Suffolk So April 22 1995.
Halevy, A., and A.L. McGuire 2006. The history and controversies of the Texas “futility” policy. Houston Lawyer, (May/June), 38–43.
Horrtor, B.J. 1998. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives. North Dakota Law Review 74: 233–293.
In Re: Conservatorship of Wanglie: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. Minnesota District Court, Probate Court Division, Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County, 1991 June 28. File PX – 91 – 283.
In the matter of Baby K, 16 F3d 590 (4th Cir 1994).
Lightfoot, L. 2005. Incompetent decision makers and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a case study. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33: 851–855. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00551.x.
Luce, J.L., and A. Alpers. 2000. Legal aspects of withholding and withdrawing life support from critically ill patients in the United States and providing palliative care to them. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 162: 2029–2032.
Morreim, E.H. 1994. Profoundly diminished life: the casualties of coercion. The Hastings Center Report 24: 33–42. doi:10.2307/3562386.
Nikolouzos v St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, 162 SW 3d 678 (Tex App Houston [14th Dist} 2005)
Pellegrino, Edmund, D. 2005. Futility in medical decisions: the word and the concept. HEC Forum 17: 308–318.
Smith, Wesley J. 2006. Death by ethics committee. Refusing to treat lives deemed unworthy of living. National Review. http://www.nationalreview.com/smithw/smith200604271406.asp. Accessed 27 April 2006.
Tenerowicz, Lynn. 2001. Navigating the waters of uncertainty: surrogate decision making at the end of life. Clinical Intensive Care 12: 101–104.
Texas Health and Safety Code 166.046(a) Vernon Supp 2002.
Truog, Robert D., Allan S. Brett, and Joel Frader. 1992. The problem with futility. New England Journal of Medicine 326: 1560–1564.
Truog, Robert D., and Christine Mitchell. 2006. Futility—from hospital policies to State laws. American Journal of Bioethics 6: 19–21.
Wojtasiewicz, Mary, E. 2006. Damage compounded: disparities, distrust, and disparate impact in end -of-life conflict resolution policies. American Journal of Bioethics 6: 8–12.
Wreen Michael, J. 2004. Medical futility and physician discretion. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 275–278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, G. Futility by Any Other Name. The Texas 10 Day Rule. Bioethical Inquiry 5, 265–270 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9114-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9114-5