Abstract
The present study attempted to develop a new measure of ecological dissonance (Miller, Topping, & Wells-Parker, 1989) for an organization and to assess its relationship with measures of alienation, involvement, and satisfaction. Questionnaires were administered to 94 faculty members at Mississippi State University. It was hypothesized that respondents experiencing greater ecological dissonance would also show higher alienation scores, lower involvement scores, and lower satisfaction scores with regard to their jobs; it was also hypothesized that the ecological dissonance levels would vary among the four influence systems (department head, dean, provost, and president of university) and would affect morale to different degrees. Correlational analyses indicated significant correlations between the measures of ecological dissonance, alienation, involvement, and satisfaction. A regression analysis revealed that the ecological dissonance generated within the department head’s influence system was the best predictor of morale. Additionally, a repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that the four influence systems differed significantly in ecological dissonance. The results supported the hypotheses and ecological dissonance theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachman, J. G. (1968). Faculty satisfaction and the dean’s influence: An organization study of twelve liberal arts colleges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 55–61.
Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. E. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311.
French, P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Lodahl, T. M., & Kesner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of his job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33.
Miller, D. I., Burton, B., Giesen, M., & Topping, J. S. (1990). Ecological dissonance theory and criterion validity of the Hooper equal opportunity measure. Psychological Reports, 66, 1155–1158.
Miller, D. I., Majors, M., Giesen, M., & Topping, J. S. (1990). The Hooper equal opportunity measure: An operational definition of ecological dissonance theory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 164–166.
Miller, D. I., & Topping, J. S. (1991). Factors of ability, communication, grievances, and personal optimism as predictors of student satisfaction, involvement, and alienation: An ecological dissonance interpretation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 19–20.
Miller, D. I., Topping, J. S., & Wells-Parker, E. N. (1989). Ecological dissonance and organizational climate. Psychological Reports, 64, 163–166.
Miller, G. A. (1967). Professions in bureaucracy: Alienation among industrial scientists and engineers. American Sociological Review, 64, 755–768.
Price, J. L. (1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, D.I., Lin, S., Giesen, J.M. et al. Leadership power discrepancies and worker morale: A test of ecological dissonance theory. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 30, 221–222 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330449
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330449