Abstract
I first summarize the central issues in the debate about the empirical adequacy of virtue ethics, and then examine the role that social psychologists claim positive and negative mood have in influencing compassionate helping behavior. I argue that this psychological research is compatible with the claim that many people might instantiate certain character traits after all which allow them to help others in a wide variety of circumstances. Unfortunately for the virtue ethicist, however, it turns out that these helping traits fall well short of exhibiting certain central features of compassion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Doris also mentions a third globalist claim:
-
(3)
Evaluative integration: In a given character or personality the occurrence of a trait with a particular evaluative valence is probabilistically related to the occurrence of other traits with similar evaluative valences.
Thus according to this claim, a person who is honest, for example, would also be expected to have and manifest other character traits relevant to honesty, such as understanding, wisdom, and courage (Ibid.).
However, evaluative integration is controversial even among virtue ethicists, and it is the first two conditions of consistency and stability which are crucial for Doris’s critical discussion of the empirical adequacy of virtue ethics. Thus I leave this third condition to one side in what follows.
-
(3)
More positively, situationism is characterized by Doris as a view which is committed to the follow three central claims:
-
(a)
“Behavioral variation across a population owes more to situational differences than disposition differences among persons…
-
(b)
Systematic observation problematizes the attribution of robust traits…
-
(c)
Personality is not often evaluatively integrated” (Doris 2002, pp. 24–25).
-
(a)
The above has become a popular way of understanding Harman’s view, but to be fair at other times he only seems to be rejecting the existence of what he calls ‘broad-based’ dispositions, i.e., traits of character which meet Doris’ first criterion for being global. Fortunately for our purposes nothing hangs on which interpretation proves to be correct.
The next three paragraphs are adapted from my 2003, appendix.
Note that rather than dropped papers in Isen and Levin’s experiment, subjects in this study had the chance to pick up dropped packages.
The purpose of this variant of the experiment was to test the alternative explanation that, “increased helpfulness could be seen as a reflection of their having been more likely to notice the person in need, rather than as a function of their mood state” (Levin and Isen 1975, p. 142).
Schellenberg and Blevins (1973) also could not duplicate the results of a different helping experiment in Isen and Levin (1972).
In their 1979 study, Batson et al. varied the dime case in such a way that, upon completing their calls, students at the University of Kansas were presented with the opportunity first to acquire information about the state of Kansas, and then soon afterwards help a female confederate who dropped a large folder of papers. The results were as follows for 40 test subjects:
Acquired information
Did not acquire
Dime
18
2
No dime
12
8
Helped
Did not help
Dime
13
7
No dime
6
14
Naturally it would be important to see if the data can be duplicated, especially given the small sample size. But even if it can be, the results of this study are not nearly as dramatic as those obtained by Isen and Levin (1972). After all, 30% of subjects helped and 60% acquired information even without the mood elevation of finding the dime in the coin slot. For more, see Batson et al. (1979, pp. 176–179).
To his credit, in a footnote (2002, p. 30, fn. 4) Doris does acknowledge the replication trouble for Isen and Levin’s experiments. Given the wealth of other similar experiments, though, it is not clear why he did not appeal directly to them instead.
For additional work on the effect of fragrances on helping behavior, see Baron and Thomley (1994).
As Doris (2002) rightly notes, “compassion the character trait is a stable and consistent disposition to perform beneficent actions; failures to behave compassionately when doing so is appropriate and not unduly costly are evidence against attributing the trait” (p. 29).
See, e.g., Schaller and Cialdini (1990, p. 271).
For a helpful overview, see Carlson et al. (1988).
Similarly, Isen notes that in certain cases it also might turn out that, “the motive to help another might outweigh one’s desire to maintain one’s own pleasant feelings if the other’s need were very great or somehow more ‘important’” (Isen 1987, p. 208). For helpful discussion of these issues, see Isen (1987).
For a similar observation, see Carlson et al. (1988, p. 215).
Note that there may be a way to reconcile Weyant’s results with the seemingly incompatible experimental results obtained by Isen and Simmonds in their dime-helping experiment. For one way of interpreting experiments such as Weyant’s is as involving the stimulation of the agent’s perceived moral obligations and the generation by those moral obligations of motivation to help. The motivation from this separate augmentation process in turn might have been strong enough to explain why subjects volunteered for the unpleasant options even though no motivation was coming from the mood maintenance system. On the other hand, in Isen and Simmonds (1978) there was no clear appeal being made to the subject’s sense of moral duty or obligation when he or she was asked to read a list of mood statements. The same is true of many other experiments offered in support of the mood maintenance hypothesis. For a similar proposal, see Carlson et al. (1988, p. 224).
See Manucia et al. (1984). For a response on behalf of the mood maintenance hypothesis, see Wegener and Petty (1994). And for related studies and general discussion of the concomitance model, see Cialdini et al. (1982), Shaffer and Graziano (1983), Manucia et al. (1984), Carlson et al. (1988), Cunningham et al. (1990) Schaller and Cialdini (1990); Wegener and Petty (1994), and Isen (1999).
For related discussion, see Isen (1987, p. 208).
See, e.g., Schaller and Cialdini (1990, p. 271).
See Weiss et al. (1973), Cialdini et al. (1973), Cialdini and Kenrick (1976), Weyant (1978), Benson (1978), Manucia et al. (1984), Cialdini et al. (1987), Batson et al. (1989), Schaller and Cialdini (1990), and Taylor (1991). For criticism of the mood management model, see Carlson and Miller (1987) and Miller and Carlson (1990). For two alternative models, see Carlson and Miller (1987, pp. 92–93), and Salovey et al. (1991, pp. 222–223).
One exception in the case of young children is when the helping behavior would be noticed by an adult. In that case, children in negative moods help more than controls, presumably for the sake of approval from the adult. See Kenrick et al. (1979).
For similar remarks, see Schaller and Cialdini (1990).
I have been presented with this objection on several occasions, but it was stated perhaps most forcefully by James Taylor in written comments on an earlier version of this paper.
One of the main alternative models to the mood management view has the same implication as well. The so-called objective self-awareness model also implies that helping occurs to alleviate negative affect. For more, see Carlson and Miller (1987, p. 93).
Similarly, he notes that “situationism does not preclude the existence of a few saints, just as it does not preclude the existence of a few monsters” (Doris 2002, p. 60).
Doris might respond that given the similarities between the situations most of us end up confronting, situational forces have habituated us into having roughly the same set of local traits associated with helping. Admittedly such a response would account for the results, but it also seems rather difficult to believe. For is it really plausible to think that many of us have, through a process of gradual habituation, acquired separate traits for picking up dropped papers, making change, donating blood, and volunteering for charity work? After all, it is not even clear that many people have been exposed to even a few, much less a significant number of repeated instances of these situation types so that they could have inculcated the relevant local character trait through habituation. Thus it seems that we would be left with a mystery as to how we have come to acquire such discrete and fine-grained helping traits in the first place.
I develop the account of GHTs in much more detail in my 2009a, b.
Here I implicitly assume the truth of the concomitance model of positive affect augmentation. If on the other hand the mood maintenance hypothesis is true, then we would have to also build the following condition into the antecedent—“…and the person takes the benefits associated with helping to outweigh the costs…”.
As Doris agrees (2002, p. 49).
For further development of the GHT model and discussion of how such traits would be distinct from traditional virtues, see my 2009a, b.
For related discussion, see footnote 23.
See especially Batson et al. (1989).
For detailed discussion of work in social psychology on empathy and helping as well as the relationship of that work to the global helping trait model, see my 2009a.
References
Alloy, L., and L. Abramson. 1979. Judgement of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108: 441–485.
Anderson, C., W. Deuser, and K. DeNeve. 1995. Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21: 434–448.
Apsler, R. 1975. Effects of embarrassment on behavior toward others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 145–153.
Aristotle, 1985. Nicomachean Ethics. Tr. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Athanassoulis, N. 2001. A response to Harman: Virtue ethics and character traits. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100: 215–222.
Barden, R., J. Garber, S. Duncan, and J. Masters. 1981. Cumulative effects of induced affective states in children: Accentuation, inoculation, and remediation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 750–760.
Baron, R. 1997. The Sweet smell of… helping: Effects of pleasant ambient fragrance on prosocial behavior in shopping malls. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23: 498–503.
Baron, R., and J. Thomley. 1994. A Whiff of reality: Positive affect as a potential mediator of the effects of pleasant fragrances on task performance and helping. Environment and Behavior 26: 766–784.
Batson, C. 1991. The Altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Batson, C. 2002. Addressing the altruism question experimentally. In Altruism & altruistic love: Science, philosophy, & religion in dialogue, ed. S. Post, L. Underwood, J. Schloss, and W. Hurlbut, 89–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Batson, C., J. Batson, C. Griffitt, S. Barrientos, J. Brandt, P. Sprengelmeyer, and M. Bayly. 1989. Negative-state relief and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 922–933.
Batson, C., J. Coke, F. Chard, D. Smith, and A. Taliaferro. 1979. Generality of the ‘glow of goodwill’: Effects of mood on helping and information acquisition. Social Psychology Quarterly 42: 176–179.
Benson, P. 1978. Social feedback, self-esteem state, and prosocial behavior. Representative Research in Social Psychology 9: 43–56.
Berg, B. 1978. Helping behavior on the gridiron: It helps if you’re winning. Psychological Reports 42: 531–534.
Blevins, G., and T. Murphy. 1974. Feeling good and helping: Further phone booth findings. Psychological Reports 34: 326.
Burnyeat, M. 1980. Aristotle on learning to be good. In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. A. Rorty, 69–92. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Campbell, J. 1999. Can philosophical accounts of altruism accommodate experimental data on helping behavior? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77: 26–45.
Carlsmith, J., and A. Gross. 1969. Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11: 232–239.
Carlson, M., V. Charlin, and N. Miller. 1988. Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 211–229.
Carlson, M., and N. Miller. 1987. Explanation of the relationship between negative mood and helping. Psychological Bulletin 102: 91–108.
Cialdini, R., D. Baumann, and D. Kenrick. 1981. Insights from sadness: A three-step model of the development of altruism as hedonism. Developmental Review 1: 207–223.
Cialdini, R., S. Brown, B. Lewis, C. Luce, and S. Neuberg. 1997. Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 481–494.
Cialdini, R., B. Darby, and J. Vincent. 1973. Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9: 502–516.
Cialdini, R., and J. Fultz. 1990. Interpreting the negative mood-helping literature via ‘mega’-analysis: A contrary view. Psychological Bulletin 107: 210–214.
Cialdini, R., and D. Kenrick. 1976. Altruism as hedonism: A social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 907–914.
Cialdini, R., D. Kenrick, and D. Baumann. 1982. Effects of mood on prosocial behavior in children and adults. In The Development of prosocial behavior, ed. N. Eisenberg-Berg, 339–359. New York: Academic Press.
Cialdini, R., M. Schaller, D. Houlihan, K. Arps, J. Fultz, and A. Beaman. 1987. Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 749–758.
Cunningham, M. 1979. Weather, mood, and helping behavior: The sunshine samaritan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1947–1956.
Cunningham, M.D. Shaffer, A. Barbee, P. Wolff, and D. Kelley. 1990. Separate processes in the relation of elation and depression to altruism: Social and personal concerns. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 26: 13–33.
Cunningham, M., J. Steinberg, and R. Grev. 1980. Wanting to and having to help: Separate motivations for positive mood and guilt-induced helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 181–192.
Darley, J., and C. Batson. 1973. ‘From Jerusalem to Jericho:’ A Study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27: 100–108.
DePaul, M. 1999. Character traits, virtues, and vices: Are there none? Proceedings of the world congress of philosophy. Philosophy Documentation Center 1: 141–157.
Donnerstein, E., M. Donnerstein, and G. Munger. 1975. Helping behavior as a function of pictorially induced moods. Journal of Social Psychology 97: 221–225.
Doris, John. 1998. Persons, situations, and virtue ethics. Noûs 32: 504–530.
Doris, John. 2002. Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, H., and T. Ashbrook. 1988. Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood state on memory. In Affect, cognition, and social behavior, ed. J. Fiedler, and J. Forgas, 25–43. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Forest, D., M. Clark, J. Mills, and A. Isen. 1979. Helping as a function of feeling state and nature of the helping behavior. Motivation and Emotion 3: 161–169.
Forgas, J. 1995. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin 117: 39–66.
Gifford, R. 1988. Light, decor, arousal, comfort, and communication. Journal of Environmental Psychology 8: 177–189.
Harada, J. 1983. The effects of positive and negative experiences on helping behavior. Japanese Psychological Research 25: 47–51.
Harman, G. 1999. Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99: 315–332.
Harman, G. 2000. The nonexistence of character traits. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100: 223–226.
Isen, A. 1987. Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz, 203–254. San Diego: Academic Press.
Isen, A. 1999. Positive affect. In Handbook of cognition and emotion, ed. T. Dalgleish, and M. Power, 521–539. Chichester: Wiley.
Isen, A., and P. Levin. 1972. Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21: 384–388.
Isen, A., and B. Means. 1983. The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition 2: 18–31.
Isen, A., T. Shalker, M. Clark, and L. Karp. 1978. Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 1–12.
Isen, A., and S. Simmonds. 1978. The effect of feeling good on a helping task that is incompatible with good mood. Social Psychology 41: 346–349.
Kamtekar, R. 2004. Situationism and virtue ethics on the content of our character. Ethics 114: 458–491.
Kenrick, D., D. Baumann, and R. Cialdini. 1979. A step in the socialization of altruism as hedonism: Effects of negative mood on children’s generosity under public and private conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 747–755.
Levin, P., and A. Isen. 1975. Further studies on the effect of feeling good on helping. Sociometry 38: 141–147.
Manucia, G., D. Baumann, and R. Cialdini. 1984. Mood influences on helping: Direct effects or side effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 357–364.
Masters, J., and W. Furman. 1976. Effects of affective states on noncontingent outcome expectancies and beliefs in internal or external control. Developmental Psychology 12: 481–482.
Mathews, K., and L. Canon. 1975. Environmental noise level as a determinant of helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 571–577.
Milgram, S. 1963. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 371–378.
Miller, C. 2003. Social psychology and virtue ethics. The Journal of Ethics 7: 365–392.
Miller, C. 2009a. Empathy, social psychology, and global helping traits. Philosophical Studies 142: 247–275.
Miller, C. 2009b. Character traits, social psychology, and impediments to helping behavior (under review).
Miller, N., and M. Carlson. 1990. Valid theory-testing meta-analyses further question the negative state relief model of helping. Psychological Bulletin 107: 215–225.
Mischel, W., B. Coates, and A. Raskoff. 1968. Effects of success and failure on self-gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10: 381–390.
Moore, B., B. Underwood, and D. Rosenhan. 1973. Affect and altruism. Developmental Psychology 8: 99–104.
Nasby, W., and R. Yando. 1982. Selective encoding and retrieval of affectively valent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 1244–1255.
O’Malley, M., and L. Andrews. 1983. The effect of mood and incentives on helping: Are there some things money can’t buy? Motivation and Emotion 7: 179–189.
Regan, J. 1971. Guilt, perceived injustice, and altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18: 124–132.
Rogers, M., N. Miller, F. Mayer, and S. Duval. 1982. Personal responsibility and salience of the request for help: Determinants of the relations between negative affect and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 956–970.
Rosenhan, D.L., P. Salovey, and K. Hargis. 1981. The joys of helping: Focus of attention mediates the impact of positive affect on altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 899–905.
Rosenhan, D., B. Underwood, and B. Moore. 1974. Affect moderates self-gratification and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30: 546–552.
Sabini, J., and M. Silver. 2005. Lack of character? Situationism critiqued. Ethics 115: 535–562.
Salovey, P., J. Mayer, and D. Rosenhan. 1991. Mood as a motivator of helping and helping as a regulator of mood. In Prosocial behavior, ed. M. Clark, 215–237. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Schaller, M., and R. Cialdini. 1990. Happiness, sadness, and helping: A motivational integration. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, ed. E. Higgins, and R. Sorrentino, 265–296. New York: The Guilford Press.
Schellenberg, J., and G. Blevins. 1973. Feeling good and helping: How quickly does the smile of dame fortune fade? Psychological Reports 33: 72–74.
Schwarz, N. 1990. Feelings as information: Information and motivational functions of affective states. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, ed. E. Higgins, and R. Sorrentino, 527–561. New York: The Guilford Press.
Shaffer, D., and W. Graziano. 1983. Effects of positive and negative moods on helping tasks having pleasant or unpleasant consequences. Motivation and Emotion 7: 269–278.
Sreenivasan, G. 2002. Errors about errors: Virtue theory and trait attribution. Mind 111: 47–68.
Taylor, S. 1991. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 110: 67–85.
Toi, M., and C. Batson. 1982. More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 281–292.
Wegener, D., and R. Petty. 1994. Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 1034–1048.
Weiss, R.J. Boyer, J. Lombardo, and M. Stitch. 1973. Altruistic drive and altruistic reinforcement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25: 390–400.
Weyant, J. 1978. Effects of mood states, costs, and benefits on helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 1169–1176.
Weyant, J., and R. Clark. 1977. Dimes and helping: The other side of the coin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 3: 107–110.
Zimbardo, P. G., W. Banks, C. Haney, and D. Jaffee. 1973. The mind is a formidable jailer: A Pirandellian prison. New York Times Magazine. April 8.
Acknowledgements
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the University of Denver conference on virtue ethics and social psychology. I am grateful to Candace Upton for inviting me to participate in the conference, and to James Taylor for very helpful written comments. Thanks as well to Ralph Kennedy, Adrian Bardon, Avram Hiller, George Graham, Stavroula Glezakos, and Win-chiat Lee for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, C. Social Psychology, Mood, and Helping: Mixed Results for Virtue Ethics. J Ethics 13, 145–173 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-009-9046-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-009-9046-2