Skip to main content
Log in

The Frankenstein Syndrome: The Creation of Mega-Media Conglomerates and Ethical Modeling in Journalism

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aristotle saw ethics as a habit that is modeled and developed though practice. Shelly's Victor Frankenstein, though well intentioned in his goals, failed to model ethical behavior for his creation, abandoning it to its own recourse. Today we live in an era of unfettered mergers and acquisitions where once separate and independent media increasingly are concentrated under the control and leadership of the fictitious but legal personhood of a few conglomerated corporations. This paper will explore the impact of mega-media mergers on ethical modeling in journalism. It will diagram the behavioral context underlying the development of ethical habits, discuss leadership theory as it applies to management, and address the question of whether the creation of mega-media conglomerates will result in responsible corporate citizens or monsters who turn on their creators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alter, J.: 2000, ‘Big Media Gets Even Bigger’, Newsweek 135(4), 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, Book II.

  • Bagdikian, B. H.: 1997, The Media Monopoly (Beacon Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal: 1994, ‘Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Strategy to Purpose’, Harvard Business Review 72(5), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal: 1995a, ‘Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Systems to People’, Harvard Business Review 73(1), 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal: 1995b, ‘Rebuilding Behavioral Context: Turn Process Reengineering into People Rejuvenation’, Sloan Management Review 37(1), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, L.: 2000, ‘Church and State’, Media Studies Journal 14(2), 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, L.: 1996 ‘What Does It all Mean?’, Media Studies Journal 10(2–3), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, J.: 1999, ‘Gnats Chasing an Elephant’, Media Studies Journal 13(2), 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M.: 1978, Leadership (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, J.: 2000, ‘Journalism Values Online’, http:// www.asne.org/kiosk/editor/november/byrd.htm

  • Cronkite, W.: 1996, ‘Roundtable: The Buck Stops Here’, Media Studies Journal 10(2–3), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, R.: 2000, ‘The Corporate Domination of Journalism’, in The Business of Journalism (The New Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. E.: 1994, ‘Work, Spirituality and the Moral Point of View’, International Journal of Value-Based Management 7(1), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W.: 1995, ‘Leadership, Moral Development, and Citizen Behavior’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K.: 1977, Servant Leadership (Paulist Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.: 2000, ‘What Is Missing from Your News?’, in The Business of Journalism (The New Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. and J. L. Heskett: 1992, Corporate Culture & Performance (Free Press, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBaton, S.: 2000, ‘AOL and Time Warner Face Criticism at F.C.C. Hearing, The New York Times (28 January), section C, 3.

  • Lucius, R. H., J. A. Sonnenfeld and M. Reene: 1996, ‘Concerns at the Top’, Media Studies Journal 10(2–3), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W.: 1999, Rich Media, Poor Democracy (University Of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, M.: 1999, ‘Navigating a Minefield’, American Journalism Review (November), 20–26.

  • Paine, L. S.: 1994, ‘Managing for Organizational Integrity’, Harvard Business Review (March-April), 106–117.

  • Rosenwein, R.: 1999, 'Why Media Mergers Matter’, www.Brill's Content.com/1999dec.

  • Rost, J. C.: 1991, Leadership for the Twenty-First Century (Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J.: 1995, ‘Leadership: A Discussion about Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(1), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, L. G. and L.L. Kanuk: 1978, Consumer Behavior (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrin, W.: 2000, The Business of Journalism (The New Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. C.: 1995, ‘Ethics and Leadership: The 1990's Introduction to the Special Issue of the Business Ethics Quarterly’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, R.A. The Frankenstein Syndrome: The Creation of Mega-Media Conglomerates and Ethical Modeling in Journalism. Journal of Business Ethics 36, 105–110 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014248014732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014248014732

Navigation