Skip to main content
Log in

D. Z. Phillips on the grammar of “God”

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this essay dedicated to the memory of D. Z. Phillips, I propose to do two things. In the first part I present his position on the grammar of God and the language game in some detail, discussing the confusion of “subliming” the logic of our language, the contextual genesis of sense and meaning, the idea of a world view, language game, logic, and grammar internal to each context, the constitution of the religious context, and the grammar of God proper to that context. In the second part I present my appreciative critical reflection by arguing that the conception of context and language game must be made more dialectical, that the grammar of God needs more systematic metaphysical analysis, and that a greater sense of the radical transcendence of God over a language game is necessary in order to avoid reductionism always inherent in any contextual approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger, P. (1997). Four faces of global culture. The National Interest (Fall 1997), available online: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2751/is_n49/ai_20319595

  2. Hoyt C. (2007). Wittgenstein and religious dogma. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61, 39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCool G.A. (eds). (1975). A Rahner reader. New York, Seabury Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Min A.K. (2004). The solidarity of others in a divided world: A postmodern theology after postmodernism. New York, T & T Clark International

    Google Scholar 

  5. Min A.K. (2005). Paths to the triune God: An encounter between Aquinas and recent theologies. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. Min A.K. (2006). Naming the unnameable God: Levinas, Derrida, and Marion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60, 99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Min A.K. (2007). Speaking of the unspeakable God: The dilemmas of the Christian discourse about God. In: Phillips D.Z. (eds) Whose God? Which tradition?. London, Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips D.Z. (1988). Faith after foundationalism: Critiques and alternatives. Boulder, Westview

    Google Scholar 

  9. Phillips D.Z. (1993). Wittgenstein and religion. London, Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips D.Z. (1995). At the mercy of method. In: Tessin T., von der Ruhr M. (Eds) Philosophy and the grammar of religious belief. New York, St. Martin’s Press, pp. 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Phillips D.Z. (2005). The problem of evil and the problem of God. Minneapolis, Fortress

    Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips D.Z. (2007). Whose God? Which tradition?. London, Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rahner K. (1969). Hearers of the word. New York, Herder and Herder

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richards G. (1978). A Wittgensteinian approach to the philosophy of religion: A critical evaluation of D. Z. Phillips. Journal of Religion 58, 288–302

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sherry P. (1972). Truth and the “Religious Language Game”. Philosophy 47(179): 18–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tillich P. (1964). Theology of culture. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anselm K. Min.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Min, A.K. D. Z. Phillips on the grammar of “God”. Int J Philos Relig 63, 131–146 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9150-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9150-9

Keywords

Navigation