Abstract
The paper reviews some of the links between the notion of “ultimate reality” and everyday life, mainly art, beauty, the creative processes in art, and citizenship. If, according to M. Heidegger, art reveals the truth of being (i.e., also of ultimate reality), then we may find some historical descriptions of creative processes that are very close to descriptions of ultimate reality. Three examples of these kinds of descriptions are discussed (Abhinavagupta, St. Augustine, F. Engels). The final aim is to show how the interpretation of ultimate reality can contribute to a better understanding of the creative process in art. These considerations can also throw light on one particular aspect of civil life—the relations between everyday life and its final goals. If we are to gain an understanding of the relations between ultimate reality, art and civil life, then the disciplines of aesthetics, philosophy, history and anthropology, and cultural history should all contribute together.
[1] Coomaraswami, A. K. (1956). The Transformation of Nature in Art. New York: Dover Publications. Search in Google Scholar
[2] Engels, F. (1888/1998). Letter to Margaret Harkness. In Ch. Harrison, P. Wood, J. Gaiger (Eds.). Art in Theory 1815–1900. An Athology of Changing Ideas. Oxford: Blackwell, 763–764. Search in Google Scholar
[3] Gbadegesin, O. (1991). Presenting This Issue. Ultimate Reality and Meaning, 14.1. Search in Google Scholar
[4] Heidegger, M. (1984). The Origin of the Work of Art. In S.D. Ross (Ed.). Art and Its Significance: An Anthology of Aesthetic Theory. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press. Search in Google Scholar
[5] Husserl, E. (1972). Krize evropských věd a transcendentální fenomenologie. Prague: Academia. Search in Google Scholar
[6] Lukács, G. (1981). Die Eigenart des Aesthetischen. Vol. 1. Berlin-Weimar: Aufbau Verlag. Search in Google Scholar
[7] Mampra, T. (1988). Religious Experience and Revelation. Journal of Dharma, 13. Search in Google Scholar
[8] Pandey, K. Ch. (1985). Abhinavagupta. Cultural Leaders of India: Aestheticians. New Delhi: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. Search in Google Scholar
[9] Plato (1984). “Ion,” Art and Its Significance: An Anthology of Aesthetic Theory. In S. D. Ross (Ed.). Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press. Search in Google Scholar
[10] Sangarakshita (1987). A Survey of Buddhism. London: Tharpa Publications. Search in Google Scholar
[11] Sri Aurobindo (1984). The Synthesis of Yoga. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram. Search in Google Scholar
[12] Wittgenstein, L. (1983). Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief. In C. Barrett (Ed.). Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar
© 2011 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
