Skip to main content
Log in

Cognition versus Constitution of Objects: From Kant to Modern Physics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classical mechanics in phase space as well as quantum mechanics in Hilbert space lead to states and observables but not to objects that may be considered as carriers of observable quantities. However, in both cases objects can be constituted as new entities by means of invariance properties of the theories in question. We show, that this way of reasoning has a long history in physics and philosophy and that it can be traced back to the transcendental arguments in Kant’s critique of pure reason.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Busch, P., Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P.: The Quantum Theory of Measurement, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Busch, P., Grabowsky, M., Lahti, P.: Operational Quantum Physics. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Castellani, E., Mittelstaedt, P.: Leibniz’ principle, physics, and the language of physics. Found. Phys. 30, 1587–1604 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Edelman, G.M.: Neural Darwinism, Basic Books. Harper Collins, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1978). Selby-Bigge, L.A., Nidditch, H. (eds.) vol. I, Chap. IV.3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kant, I.: Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998). English translation by P. Guyer and A.W. Wood

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leibniz, G.W.: Die Philosophischen Schriften, I–VII. Gerhard, C.I. (ed.) Berlin (1875–1890), quoted here as GP, I–VII

  8. Mittelstaedt, P.: Constituting, naming, and identity in quantum logic. In: Mittelstaedt, P., Stachow, E.-W. (eds.) Recent Developments in Quantum Logic, pp. 215–234. B.I. Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mittelstaedt, P.: The constitution of objects in Kant’s philosophy and in modern physics. In: Parrini, P. (ed.) Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, pp. 115–129. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mittelstaedt, P.: Constitution of objects in classical mechanics and in quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34, 1615–1626 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Pauen, M., Roth, G. (eds.): Neurowissenschaften und Philosophie. Wilhelm Fink, München (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piron, C.: Foundations of Quantum Physics. W.A. Benjamin, Reading (1976). p. 93 ff.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Singer, W.: Neurobiologische Anmerkungen zum Konstruktivismus-Diskurs. In: Singer, W. (ed.) Der Beobachter im Gehirn, pp. 87–111. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sudarshan, E.C.G., Mukunda, N.: Classical Mechanics: A Modern Perspective. Wiley, New York (1974)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Weyl, H.: Philosophie der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften, 3rd edn. Oldenburg, München (1966)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Mittelstaedt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittelstaedt, P. Cognition versus Constitution of Objects: From Kant to Modern Physics. Found Phys 39, 847–859 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9277-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9277-x

Keywords

Navigation