Skip to main content
Log in

Against a Minimalist Reading of Bell's Theorem: Lessons from Fine

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the validity of Bell's inequalities implies the existence of joint probabilities for non-commuting observables, there is no universal consensus as to what the violation of these inequalities signifies. While the majority view is that the violation teaches us an important lesson about the possibility of explanations, if not about metaphysical issues, there is also a minimalist position claiming that the violation is to be expected from simple facts about probability theory. This minimalist position is backed by theorems due to A. Fine and I. Pitowsky.Our paper shows that the minimalist position cannot be sustained. To this end,we give a formally rigorous interpretation of joint probabilities in thecombined modal and spatiotemporal framework of `stochastic outcomes inbranching space-time' (SOBST) (Kowalski and Placek, 1999; Placek, 2000). We show in this framework that the claim that there can be no joint probabilities fornon-commuting observables is incorrect. The lesson from Fine's theorem is notthat Bell's inequalities will be violated anyhow, but that an adequate modelfor the Bell/Aspect experiment must not define global joint probabilities. Thus we investigate the class of stochastic hidden variable models, whichprima facie do not define such joint probabilities. The reasonwhy these models fail supports the majority view: Bell's inequalities are notjust a mathematical artifact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., and Roger, G.: 1982, 'Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers', Physical Review Letters 49, 1804–1807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N.: 1992, 'Branching Space—Time', Synthese 92, 385–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugajski, S.: 1976, 'Joint Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics', Unpublished typescript, Katowice.

  • Bugajski, S.: 1978, 'A Remark on Joint Probability Distributions for Quantum Observables', Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 33a, 1383–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beare, W., Mann, A., and Revzen: M.: 1999, 'Locality and Bell's Theorem', Foundations of Physics 29, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1982a, 'Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities', Physical Review Letters 48, 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1982b, 'Joint Distributions, Quantum Correlations, and Commuting Observables', Journal of Mathematical Physics 23, 1306–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer-Szabó, G., Rédei, M., and Szabó, L. E.: 1999, 'On Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle and Reichenbach's Notion of Common Cause', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 377–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelga, S., Ferrero, M., and Santos, E.: 1995, 'Loophole-free Test of the Bell Inequality', Physical Review A 51, 5008–5011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, T. and Placek, T.: 1999, 'Outcomes in Branching Space—Time', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 349–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, L. J.: 1987, 'On the Violation of Bell's Inequality in Quantum Theory', Physics Letters A120, 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E.: 1967, Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitowsky, I.: 1989, Quantum Probability — Quantum Logic, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placek, T.: 2000, 'Stochastic Outcomes in Branching Space—Time: Analysis of Bell's Theorem', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51(3), 445–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1956, The Direction of Time, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. and Zanotti, M.: 1976, 'On the Determinism of Hidden Variable Theories with Strict Correlation and Conditional Statistical Independence of Observables', in P. Suppes (ed.), Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlichny, G., Redhead, M., Brown, H., and Butterfield, J.: 1988, 'Do the Bell Inequalities Require the Existence of Joint Probability Distributions?', Philosophy of Science 55, 387–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, L. E.: forthcoming 2000, 'Critical Reflections on Quantum Probability Theory', in M. Rédei and M. Stoelzner (eds), John von Neumann and the Foundations of Physics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  • Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., and Zeilinger, A.: 1998, 'Violation of Bell's Inequality under strict Einstein Locality Conditions', Physical Review Letters 81, 5039–5043.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, T., Placek, T. Against a Minimalist Reading of Bell's Theorem: Lessons from Fine. Synthese 128, 343–379 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011971808127

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011971808127

Keywords

Navigation