Abstract
A decision maker bets on the outcomes of a sequence of coin-tossings. At the beginning of the game the decision maker can choose one of two coins to play the game. This initial choice is irreversible. The coins can be biased and the player is uncertain about the nature of one (or possibly both) coin(s). If the player is an expected-utility maximizer, her choice of the coin will depend on different elements: the nature of the game (namely, whether she can observe the outcomes of the previous tosses before making her next decision), her utility function, the prior distribution on the bias of the coin. We will show that even a risk averter might optimally choose a riskier coin when learning is allowed. We will express most of our results in the language of stochastic orderings, allowing comparisons that are valid for large classes of utility functions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Assaf, D., Goldstein, L. and Samuel-Cahn, E. (1998), A statistical version of prophet inequalities. Ann. Statist. 26: 1190–1197.
Athey, S. and Levin, J. (1998), The value of information in monotone decision problems. mimeo.
Bassan, B., Gossner, O., Scarsini, M. and Zamir, S. (1999), A class of games with positive value of information. Technical Report, THEMA, CNRS.
Berry, D.A. and Fristedt, B. (1985), Bandit Problems. London: Chapman & Hall.
Bikhchandani, S., Segal, U. and Sharma, S. (1992), Stochastic dominance under Bayesian learning. J. Econom. theory 56: 352–377.
Blackwell, D. (1951), Comparison of experiments. In: Proceedints of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1950 (pp. 93–102). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Blackwell, D. (1953), Equivalent comparisons of experiments. Ann. Math. Statistics 24: 265–272.
Chan, Y.S. (1981), A note on risk and the value of information. J. Econom. Theory 25: 461–465.
Chassagnon, A. and Vergnaud, J.-C. (1998), A positive value of information for a non-Bayesian decision-maker. mimeo.
Epstein, L.G. and Zin, S.E. (1989), Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: theoretical framework. Econometrica 57: 937–969.
Gittins, J.C. (1989), Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Gould, J.P. (1974), Risk, stochastic preference, and the value of information. J. Econom. Theory 8: 64–84.
Grant, S., Kajii, A. and Polak, B. (1998a), Intrinsic preference for information. J. Econom. Theory 83: 233–259.
Grant, S., Kajii, A. and Polak, B. (1998b), Preference for information and dynamic consistency. mimeo.
Halevy, Y. and Feltkamp, V. (1999), A Bayesian approach to uncertainty aversion. mimeo.
Hill, T.P. and Kertz, R.P. (1992), A survey of prophet inequalities in optimal stopping theory. In: Stragegies for Sequential Search and Selection in Real Time (Amherst, MA, 1990). pp. (191–207) Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Kamien, M.I., Tauman, Y. and Zamir, S. (1990), On the value of information in a strategic conflict. Games Econom. Behav. 2: 129–153.
Kreps, D.M. and Porteus, E.L. (1979), Dynamic choice theory and dynamic programming. Econometrica 47: 91–100.
Magnac, T. and Robin, J.-M. (1999) Dynamic stochastic dominance in bandit decision problems. Theory and Decision 47: 267–295.
Persico, N. (2000), Information acquisition in auctions. Econometrica 68: 136–148.
Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1970), Increasing risk. I. A definition. J. Econom. Theory 2: 225–243.
Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1972), Addendum to: Increasing risk. I. A definition. J. Econom. Theory 5: 306.
Safra, Z. and Sulganik, E. (1995), On the non-existence of Blackwell’s theory type results with general preference relations. J. Risk Uncertain 10: 187–201.
Schervish, M.J. (1995), Theory of Statistics. New York: Springer.
Schlee, E.E. (1991), The value of perfect information in nonlinear utility theory. Theory and Decision 30: 127–131.
Schlee, E.E. (1997), The sure thing principle and the value of information. Theory and Decision 42: 21–36.
Schlee, E.E. (1998), Corrigenda: The sure thing principle and the value of information. Theory and Decision 45: 199–200.
Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1989), Preferences for information on probabilities versus prizes: The role of risk-taking attitudes. J. Risk Uncertain 2: 37–60.
Shaked, M. (1980), On mixtures from exponential families. J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 42: 192–198.
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J.G. (1994), Stochastic Orders and Their Applications. Boston, MA: Academic Press Inc.
Strassen, V. (1965), The existence of probability measures with given marginals. Ann. Math. Statist. 36: 423–439.
Sulganik, E. and Zilcha, I. (1997), The value of information: The case of signal-dependent opportunity sets. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 21: 1615–1625.
Veinott, Jr. A.F. (1965), Optimal policy in a dynamic, single product, non-stationary inventory model with several demand classes. Operations Res. 13: 761–778.
Wakker, P. (1988), Non-expected utility as aversion to information. J. Behav. Decision Making 1: 169–175.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, A., Scarsini, M. Even Risk-Averters may Love Risk. Theory and Decision 52, 81–99 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015513000587
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015513000587