Notes
M.Dummett, The Interpretations of Frege's Philosophy (London: Duckworth, 1981), p. 82.
G.Evans, The Varieties of Reference, ed. J.McDowell (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981), p. 226.
P.Pettit and J.McDowell (Eds.), Subject, Thought and Context (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), p. 13.
P.Pettit and J.McDowell (Eds.), Subject, Thought and Context (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), p. 164.
The Varieties of Reference, pp. 307–308.
C.Peacocke, Sense and Content (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
C.Peacocke, Sense and Content (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), p. 4.
C.Peacocke, Sense and Content (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), p. 7.
R.Sokolowski, “Intentional Analysis and the Noema”, Dialectica 38 (1984), 114–129.
Cp. B.K.Matilal, Perception. An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).
M.Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York: Pantheon Books, 1971), p. 10.
Ibid., Part II, Ch. 1.
M.Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York: Pantheon Books, 1971), pp. 32–33.
D. Davidson, “On the very Idea of Conceptual Scheme,” in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 17 (1973/74), pp. 5–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Lecture given at the Annual meeting of the British Society for Phenomenology held at St. Edmund Hall, Oxford, on 25 March 1988. The occasion was remembering Husserls passing away fifty years ago.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohanty, J.N. The relevance of Husserl today. Husserl Stud 5, 219–233 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419044
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419044