Abstract
Introduction
This paper focuses on a radical feminist engagement with mathematical pluralism. Radical Feminists are interested in a project of methodological re-tooling. Mathematical pluralism appears to be a possible source of help in this direction.
Materials and Methods
With this aim in view the article examines the contributions of Mihir Chakraborty and Amita Chatterjee. By using the method of philosophical argument their theses have been judged from a feminist perspective.
Results
Some very interesing results have been arrived at in terms of accommodating vagueness and pluralism into feminist methodology by the help of mathematical pluralism.
Discussion
By the way of an ongoing discussion the paper states the contours of a radical feminist road map and specifies the kind help they seek from mathematical pluralism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chakraborty, M. (2010). Amimangsar Alo-Andhari. Kolkata: Nandimukh Samsad.
Chakraborty, M. (2011). Ganiter Dharapat o Galpasalpa (2001). (In Bengali). Kolkata: Nandimukh Sansad.
Chakraborty, M. (2012). Gödeler Asampurnata Tatva. (In Bengali). Kolkata: Nandimukh Sansad.
Chatterjee, A. (1994). Understanding vagueness. New Delhi: Pragati Publications.
Descartes, R. (1949). A Discourse on Method (trans: Veitch, J.), Everyman's Library. London: J. M. Dent & Sons, Ltd.
Honderich, T. (Ed.). (1995). The Oxford companion of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moitra, S. (2014). Can the Feminists qua Feminists be Allies of M. C. In M. Vij et al. (Eds.), Women’s studies in India: A journey of 25 years. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moitra, S. Some Feminist Expectations from Mathematical Pluralism. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 34, 247–257 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-016-0083-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-016-0083-5