Skip to main content

Introduction to Human Dignity in African Thought

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Dignity in an African Context

Abstract

The introductory chapter gives the reader an overall sense of the book. The book focuses on human dignity in an African context. The chapter aims to convey a sense of the scope of African conceptions of human dignity, their contested nature, and their importance for the broader literature on human dignity. It also motivates and justifies our focus in the book on perspectives and voices from an African context in relation to the subject of human dignity. Finally, it gives the reader a sense of the contributions made by various theorists in this volume on African conceptions of human dignity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We do not want to give the false impression that all the chapters in this book do engage the three major limitations in relation to the concept of human dignity: the general lack of reliance on African languages to analyse human dignity, lack of explicit definition of human dignity and avoidance of relying on Western conceptions (or theories of human dignity) to accounts for African political theory. The point is to give the reader a sense of status of the literature in African political thought in relation to concept of human dignity and the limitations in the literature in relation to it. The hope is that this book goes some way toward responding to these limitations, while inviting other scholars to contribute to understanding of the concept of human dignity in African political thought.

  2. 2.

    It is not our view that for some idea to be African, it must be authored in Africa or have ideas that are salient in Africa. We do believe that the intersection of the two, writing from Africa and being influenced by ideas, values, traditions and/or experiences from it, represents the ideal condition for some view to count as Africa.

References

  • Andorno, R. 2013. The dual role of human dignity in bioethics. Medical Health Care Philosophy 16 (4): 967–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, K. 2013. Two ‘normative’ conceptions of personhood. Quest 25: 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyleveld, D., and B. Roger. 2001. Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bujo, B. 2001. Foundations of an African ethic: Beyond the universal claims of Western morality. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J. 1982. Human rights and human dignity: An analytic critique of non-Western conceptions of human rights. The American Political Science Review 76: 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Normative versus taxonomic humanity: Varieties of human dignity in the Western tradition. Journal of Human Rights 14: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duwell, M., J. Braarvig, R. Brownsend, and D. Mieth, eds. 2014. The Cambridge handbook for human dignity: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. 2008. On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gyekye, K. 1992. Person and community in African thought. In Person and community: Ghanaian philosophical studies, 1, ed. K. Wiredu and K. Gyekye, 101–124. Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. An essay on African philosophical thought: The Akan conceptual scheme. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Tradition and modernity: Philosophical reflections on the African experience. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. African ethics. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/african-ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2010. The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights. Metaphilosophy 4: 464–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. 2011. The concept of dignity in the universal declaration of human rights. Journal of Religious Ethics 39: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikuenobe, P. 2017. The communal basis for moral dignity: An African perspective. Philosophical Papers 45: 437–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Human rights, personhood, dignity, and African communalism. Journal of Human Rights 17: 589–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilesanmi, O. 2001. Human rights discourse in modern Africa: A comparative religious perspective. Journal Religious Ethics 23: 293–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz, Bruce B. 2009. Philosophy in an African place. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworska, A., and J. Tannenbaum. 2018. The grounds of moral status. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. Zalta. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and In-formation, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/groundsmoral-status/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kateb, G. 2011. Human dignity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P., H. Kuch, C. Neuhauser, and E. Webster. 2011. Humiliation, degradation and dehumanisation: Human dignity violated. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1981. After Virtue. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. 2003. Dignity is a useless concept. BMJ 327: 1419–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J., and N. Lickiss. 2007. Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Masolo, D. 2010. Self and community in a changing world. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matolino, B., and W. Kwindingwi. 2013. The end of Ubuntu. South African Journal of Philosophy 32: 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbiti, J. 1970. Introduction to African religion. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkiti, I. 1984. Person and community in African traditional thought. In African philosophy: An introduction, ed. Richard Wright, 171–181. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. On the normative conception of a person. In Companion to African Philosophy, ed. Kwasi Wiredu, 324–331. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. 2007. Toward an African moral theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 15: 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Human dignity, capital punishment and an African moral theory: Toward a new philosophy of human rights. Journal of Human Rights 9: 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012a. An African theory of moral status: A relational alternative to individualism and holism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice: An International Forum 14: 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. African conceptions of human dignity: Vitality and community as the ground of human rights. Human Rights Review 13: 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. A relational moral theory: African ethics in and beyond the continent. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T., and D. Bell. 2013. Confucianism and Ubuntu: Reflections on a dialogue between Chinese and African traditions. Special Issue: Confucian Philosophy: Innovations and Transformations 35: 78–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, L. 2014. Defining dignity and its place in human rights. The New Bioethics 20: 12–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. 2012. The ethics of need: Agency, dignity and obligation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Reconsidering dignity relationally. Ethics and Social Welfare 11: 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, Barbara A. 2013. The idea of dignity: Its modern significance. European Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molefe, M. 2019. An African philosophy of personhood, morality and politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2022. Human dignity in African philosophy: A very short introduction. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molefe, M., and C. Allsobrook. 2018. Editorial: African philosophy and rights. Theoria 65: v–vii.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. Introduction to African Political Theory of Needs. Towards an African Political Philosophy of Needs, eds. Motsamai Molefe and Christopher Allsobrook, 1–19. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyowe, A. 2014. An African conception of human rights? Comments on the challenges of relativism. Human Rights Review 15: 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojman, L. 2002. What is ethics? In Ethical theory: Classic and contemporary readings, ed. L. Pojman, 1–7. London: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P. 2015. Human dignity as an essentially contested concept. Cambridge Review International Affairs 28 (4): 743–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. 2012. Dignity: Its history and meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, D., and A. Bani-Sadr. 2017. Dignity in the 21st century Middle East and West. New York: Springer Open.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, A. 2008. Bioethics and the question of human dignity. In The President’s council on bioethics, human dignity and bioethics: Essays commissioned by the President’s council, 2–19. Washington DC: President’s Council on Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shutte, A. 2001. Ubuntu: An ethic for a new South Africa. Pietermaritzburg: Cluster Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulmasy, D. 2008. Dignity and bioethics: History, theory, and selected applications. In The President’s council on bioethics, human dignity and bioethics: Essays commissioned by the President’s council, 469–502. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, A. 2009. Political philosophy: A beginners’ guide for students and politicians. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. 1948. Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/universaldeclarationhuman-rights/.

  • Waldron, J. 2013. Is dignity the foundation of human rights? New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 374. Accessed 18 November 2022. http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/374.

  • Wiredu, K. 1992. Moral foundations of an African culture. In Person and community: Ghanaian philosophical studies, 1, ed. K. Wiredu and K. Gyekye, 192–206. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Cultural universals and particulars: An African perspective. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Social philosophy in postcolonial Africa: Some preliminaries concerning communalism and communitarianism. South African Journal of Philosophy 27: 332–339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motsamai Molefe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Molefe, M., Allsobrook, C. (2023). Introduction to Human Dignity in African Thought. In: Molefe, M., Allsobrook, C. (eds) Human Dignity in an African Context. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37341-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics