Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring Ethical Issues Related to Patient Engagement in Healthcare: Patient, Clinician and Researcher’s Perspectives

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient engagement in healthcare is increasingly discussed in the literature, and initiatives engaging patients in quality improvement activities, organizational design, governance, and research are becoming more and more common and have even become mandatory for certain health institutions. Here we discuss a number of ethical challenges raised by this engagement from patients from the perspectives of research, organizational/quality improvement practices, and patient experiences, while offering preliminary recommendations as to how to address them. We identified three broad categories of ethical issues that intersect between the different types of patient engagement: (1) establishing a shared vision about goals of patient engagement and respective roles; (2) the process and method of engaging with patients; and (3) practical aspects of patient engagement. To explain these issues, we build from our personal, professional, and academic experiences, as well as traditions such as pragmatism and hermeneutics that stress the importance of participation, empowerment, and engagement.  Patient engagement can be highly valuable at numerous levels, but particular attention should be paid to the process of engaging with patients and related ethical issues. Some lessons from the literature on the ethics of participatory research can be translated to organizational and quality improvement practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks, S., A. Armstrong, K. Carter, et al. 2013. Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science 8(3): 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barello, S., G. Graffigna, and E. Vegni. 2012. Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: Mapping the literature. Nursing Research and Practice Nursing Research and Practice 2012(2): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury-Jones, C., and J. Taylor. 2015. Engaging with children as co-researchers: Challenges, counter-challenges and solutions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18(2): 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D.R., F.G. Miller, and N. Wallerstein. 2007. Ethical issues in community-based participatory research: Balancing rigorous research with community participation in community intervention studies. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 1(2): 153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, P.L., P. Pluye, C. Loignon, et al. 2017. Organizational participatory research: A systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them. Implementation Science 12(1): 119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). 2014. Strategy for patient-oriented research: Patient engagement framework. Ottawa: Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargo, M., and S.L. Mercer. 2008. The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health 29: 325–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, K.L., P. Dardess, M. Maurer, et al. 2013. Patient and family engagement: A framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs 32(2): 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S., G. Embuldeniya, J. Abelson, M. McGillion, A. Berkesse, and J. Healey. 2017. Questioning patient engagement: Research scientists’ perceptions of the challenges of patient engagement in a cardiovascular research network. PPA Patient Preference and Adherence 11: 1573–1583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, A., and E. Racine. 2018. Person-oriented research ethics. https://www.autismresearchethics.net/. Accessed January 21, 2019.

  • Doria, N., B. Condran, L. Boulos, et al. 2018. Sharpening the focus: Differentiating between focus groups for patient engagement vs. qualitative research. Research Involvement and Engagement 4(1): 19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dunston, R., A. Lee, D. Boud, P. Brodie, and M. Chiarella. 2009. Co-production and health system reform–from re-imagining to re-making. Australian Journal of Public Administration 68(1): 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouinlock, J. 1978. Dewey’s theory of moral deliberation. Ethics 88(1977–1978): 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouinlock, J. (ed). 2002. The moral writings of John Dewey, Great Books in Philosophy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

  • Green, L.W. 2008. Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family practice 25(S1): i20–i24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L.W., Royal Society of Canada, and BC Consortium for Health Promotion Research. 1995. Study of participatory research in health promotion: Review and recommendations for the development of participatory research in health promotion in Canada. Royal Society of Canada.

  • Hagan, T.L., K. Schmidt, G.R. Ackison, M. Murphy, and J.R. Jones. 2017. Not the last word: Dissemination strategies for patient-centred research in nursing. Journal of Research in Nursing 22(5): 388–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, D.L., A.E. Hoffmann, M. Felzien, J.W. LeMaster, J. Xu, and L.J. Fagnan. 2017. Tokenism in patient engagement. Family practice 34(3): 290–295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, T., E. Larson, and R. Schnall. 2017. Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: A concept analysis. Patient Education and Counseling 100(1): 30–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2016. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. www.icmje.org/recommendations. Accessed January 16, 2019.

  • Ives, J., S. Damery, and S. Redwod. 2013. PPI, paradoxes and Plato: Who’s sailing the ship? Journal of Medical Ethics 39(3): 181–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jagosh, J., A.C. Macaulay, P. Pluye et al. 2012. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: Implications of a realist review for health research and practice. The Milbank Quarterly 90(2): 311–346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.E., T.M. Mroz, M. Abraham, et al. 2016. Promoting patient and family partnerships in ambulatory care improvement: A narrative review and focus group findings. Advances in Therapy 33(8): 1417–1439.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaner, S. 2014. Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G., S-Y. Wang, G. Lucas, L. Fraenkel, and C.P. Gross. 2017. Facilitating meaningful engagement on community advisory committees in patient-centered outcome research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 11(3): 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Määttä, S., K. Lützén, and S. Öresland. 2017. Contract theories and partnership in health care. A philosophical inquiry to the philosophy of John Rawls and Seyla Benhabib. NUP Nursing Philosophy 18(3): e12164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K., and N. Britten. 2017. “How can anybody be representative for those kind of people?” Forms of patient representation in health research, and why it is always contestable. Social Science & Medicine 183: 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlett, N., S. Shklarov, D. Marshall, M. Santana, and T. Wasylak. 2015. Building new relationships in research: A model of patient engagement research. Quality of Life Research 24(5): 1057–1067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikesell, L., E. Bromley, and D. Khodyakov. 2013. Ethical community-engaged research: A literature review. American Journal of Public Health 103(12): 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M. 2016. Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior 31(6): 684–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M., P. Fadem, M. Perry, K. Blum, L. Moore, and J. Rogers. 2002. Ethical dilemmas in participatory action research: A case study from the disability community. Health Education & Behavior 29(1): 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montreuil, M., and F.A. Carnevale. 2018. Participatory hermeneutic ethnography: A methodological framework for health ethics research with children. Qualitative Health Research 28(7): 1135–1144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montreuil, M., C. Thibeault, L. McHarg, and F.A. Carnevale. 2018. Children’s moral experiences of crisis management in a child mental health setting. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 27(5): 1440–1448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, D., J. Salsberg, and A.C. Macaulay. 2009. A guide to researcher and knowledge-user collaboration in health research. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

  • Pomey, M.P., L. Flora, P. Karazivan, et al. 2015. Le “Montreal model”: Enjeux du partenariat relationnel entre patients et professionnels de la santé [The “Montreal model”: Challenges of the partnership relationship between patients and health professionals]. Sante publique 27(1): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomey, M.P., D.P. Ghadiri, P. Karazivan, N. Fernandez, and N. Clavel. 2015. Patients as partners: A qualitative study of patients’ engagement in their health care. PloS One 10(4): e0122499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pomey, M-P., H. Hihat, M. Khalifa, P. Lebel, A. Néron, and V. Dumez. 2015. Patient partnership in quality improvement of healthcare services: Patients’ inputs and challenges faced. Patient Experience Journal 2(1): 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racine, E., E. Bell, B. Farlow, et al. 2017. The “ouR-HOPE” approach for ethics and communication about neonatal neurological injury. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 59(2): 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renedo, A., and C. Marston. 2011. Healthcare professionals’ representations of “patient and public involvement” and creation of “public participant” identities: Implications for the development of inclusive and bottom-up community participation initiatives. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 21(3): 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., F. Ross, S. Donovan, et al. 2008. Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: A review of evidence and practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45(2): 298–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolper, M., B. Molewijk, and G. Widdershoven. 2015. Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitator of moral case deliberation. HEC forum.

  • Taylor, C. 1971. Interpretation and the sciences of man. The Review of Metaphysics, 3–51.

  • ----. 2004. Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 (TCPS2). 2014. Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R. 1988. The patient as partner: A theory of human experimentation ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 16(1): 190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., and B. Duran. 2017. The theoretical, historical and practice roots of CBPR. In Community based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity, edited by N. Wallerstein, B. Duran, J.G. Oetzel, and M. Minkler, 17–30. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdershoven, G., T. Abma, and B. Molewijk. 2009. Empirical ethics as dialogical practice. Bioethics 23(4): 236–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E., A. Kenny, and V. Dickson-Swift. 2018. Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research 28(2): 189–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, Montréal, Québec, H2W 1R7, Canada

    Marjorie Montreuil & Eric Racine

  2. Department of Management, HEC Montréal, 3000 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, H3T 2A7, Canada

    Joé T. Martineau

Authors
  1. Marjorie Montreuil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joé T. Martineau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Racine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Racine.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montreuil, M., Martineau, J.T. & Racine, E. Exploring Ethical Issues Related to Patient Engagement in Healthcare: Patient, Clinician and Researcher’s Perspectives. Bioethical Inquiry 16, 237–248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09904-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09904-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation