Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relational values and management of plant resources in two communities in a highly biodiverse area in western Mexico

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many cultures, interactions between humans and plants are rooted in what is called “relational values”—values that derive from relationships and entail reciprocity. In Mexico, biocultural diversity is mirrored in the knowledge and use of some 6500 plant species and the domestication of over 250 Mesoamerican native crop species. This research explores how different sets of values are attributed to plants and how these influence management strategies to maintain plant resources in wild and anthropogenic environments. We ran workshops in two communities (one Indigenous, the other non-Indigenous) in a highly biodiverse region in western Mexico, to ascertain the values and management activities related to important plant resources. The relationship between values attributed to plants and management activities was examined through redundancy analysis. A total of 180 plant resources were mentioned during the workshops, with a broad spectrum of values attributed to them, including material, non-material, and regulatory dimensions. We divided plant management strategies into three general categories of increasing intensity and complexity. We found that participants in the Indigenous community value and manage more wild plant resources than people in the non-Indigenous community. We also identified relationships between plant resource values and the type of management performed; for example, more intensive forms of management, such as sowing seeds, were used for seasonal plants that had a food value. By valuing and managing different sets of plant resources from forest, agricultural plots, and home gardens, people enabled multi-functional landscapes to form, illustrating a key feature of relational values in agroecosystems, which promotes both conservation and domestication of plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These figures add up to over 100% because some resources were located in more than one place. The same is true for the management forms.

References

  • Allen, K.E., C.E. Quinn, C. English, and J.E. Quinn. 2018. Relational values in agroecosystem governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. 2002. Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Arévalo, P., B. Martín-López, and E. Gómez-Baggethun. 2017. Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 22 (4): 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols, N., and V.M. Toledo. 2005. Ethnoecology of the Yucatec Maya: Symbolism, knowledge and management of natural resources. Journal of Latin American Geography 4 (1): 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellon, M.R., and J. Hellin. 2011. Planting hybrids, keeping landraces: Agricultural modernization and tradition among small-scale maize farmers in Chiapas, Mexico. World Development 39 (8): 1434–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, B.F., E. Cevallos, E. Muñoz, and M.F. Santana. 1996. Ethnobotany serving society: A case study from the Sierra de Manantlán Biosphere Reserve. SIDA 17 (1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, B., F. Santana, R. Pineda, J. Cevallos, L. Robles, and D. De Niz. 1994. Characterization of mestizo plant use in the Sierra de Manantlan, Jalisco-Colima, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 14 (1): 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancas, J., A. Casas, D. Pérez-Salicrup, J. Caballero, and E. Vega. 2013. Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing plant management in Náhuatl communities of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9 (1): 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcard, D., F. Gillet, and P. Legendre. 2011. Numerical Ecology with R. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E.S., E. Ostrom, and O.R. Young. 2009. Connectivity and the governance of multilevel socio-ecological systems: The role of social capital. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34: 253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bye, R.A. 1993. The role of humans in the diversification of plants in Mexico. In Biological Diversity of Mexico. Origins and Distribution, eds T.P. Ramamoorthy, R.A. Bye, A. Lot, and J.E. Fa, 707–731. NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Cámara-Leret, R., and J. Bascompte. 2021. Language extinction triggers the loss of unique medicinal knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118: 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camou-Guerrero, A., V. Reyes-García, M. Martínez-Ramos, and A. Casas. 2008. Knowledge and use value of plant species in a rarámuri community: A gender perspective for conservation. Human Ecology 36 (2): 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, A., A. Otero-Arnaiz, E. Pérez-Negrón, and A. Valiente-Banuet. 2007. In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Annals of Botany 100 (5): 1101–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, A., and F. Parra. 2017. El manejo de los recursos naturales y ecosistemas: la sustentabilidad en el manejo de recursos genéticos. In Domesticación en el continente americano, eds A. Casas, J. Torres-Guevara, and F. Parra, 25–50. Lima: Fondo editorial UNALM.

  • Castillo, A., C. Godínez, N. Schroeder, C. Galicia, A. Pujadas-Botey, and L. Martínez Hernández. 2009. El bosque tropical seco en riesgo: Conflictos entre uso agropecuario, desarrollo turístico y provisión de servicios ecosistémicos en la costa de Jalisco, México. Interciencia 34 (12): 844–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K.M.A., P. Balvanera, K. Benessaiah, M. Chapman, S. Díaz, E. Gómez-Baggethun, R.K. Gould, N. Hannahs, K. Jax, S.C. Klain, S. Klain, G.W. Luck, B. Martín-López, B. Muraca, B. Norton, K. Ott, U. Pascual, T. Satterfield, M. Tadaki, J. Taggart, and N. Turner. 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (6): 1462–1465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K.M.A., R.K. Gould, and U. Pascual. 2018. Editorial overview: Relational values: What are they, and what’s the fuss about ? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: A1–A7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, C.R., A. Casas, F.A. Parra-Rondinel, C. Levis, N. Peroni, N. Hanazaki, L. Cortés-Zárraga, S. Rangel-Landa, R.P. Alves, M.J. Ferreira, M.F. Cassino, S.D. Coelho, A. Cruz-Soriano, M. Pancorbo-Olivera, J. Blancas, A. Martínez-Ballesté, G. Lemes, E. Lotero-Velásquez, V.M. Bertin, and G.G. Mazzochini. 2021. Disentangling domestication from food production systems in the neotropics. Quaternary 4 (1): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, S., S. Demissew, J. Carabias, C. Joly, M. Lonsdale, N. Ash, A. Larigauderie, J.R. Adhikari, S. Arico, A. Báldi, A. Bartuska, I.A. Baste, A. Bilgin, E. Brondizio, K.M.A. Chan, V.E. Figueroa, A. Duraiappah, M. Fischer, R. Hill, T. Koetz, P. Leadley, P. Lyver, G. Mace, B. Martin-Lopez, M. Okumura, D. Pacheco, U. Pascual, E.S. Pérez, B. Reyers, E. Roth, O. Saito, R.J. Scholes, N. Sharma, H. Tallis, R. Thaman, R. Watson, T. Yahara, Z.A. Hamid, C. Akosim, Y. Al-Hafedh, R. Allahverdiyev, E. Amankwah, S.T. Asah, Z. Asfaw, G. Bartus, L.A. Brooks, J. Caillaux, G. Dalle, D. Darnaedi, A. Driver, G. Erpul, P. Escobar-Eyzaguirre, P. Failler, A.M.M. Fouda, B. Fu, H. Gundimeda, S. Hashimoto, F. Homer, S. Lavorel, G. Lichtenstein, W.A. Mala, W. Mandivenyi, P. Matczak, C. Mbizvo, M. Mehrdadi, J.P. Metzger, J.B. Mikissa, H. Moller, H.A. Mooney, P. Mumby, H. Nagendra, C. Nesshover, A.A. Oteng-Yeboah, G. Pataki, M. Roué, J. Rubis, M. Schultz, P. Smith, R. Sumaila, K. Takeuchi, S. Thomas, M. Verma, Y. Yeo-Chang, and D. Zlatanova. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, S., U. Pascual, M. Stenseke, B. Martín-López, R.T. Watson, Z. Molnár, R. Hill, K.M.A. Chan, I.A. Baste, K.A. Brauman, S. Polasky, A. Church, M. Lonsdale, A. Larigauderie, P.W. Leadley, A.P.E. Van Oudenhoven, F. Van Der Plaat, M. Schröter, S. Lavorel, Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas, E. Bukvareva, K. Davies, S. Demissew, G. Erpul, P. Failler, C.A. Guerra, C.L. Hewitt, H. Keune, S. Lindley, and Y. Shirayama. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359 (6373): 270–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada-Gutiérrez, M., and P.R.W. Gerritsen. 2011. Turismo rural sustentable. México, D.F.: Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de la Costa Sur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farfán-Heredia, B., A. Casas, A.I. Moreno-Calles, E. García-Frapolli, and A. Castilleja. 2018. Ethnoecology of the interchange of wild and weedy plants and mushrooms in Phurépecha markets of Mexico: Economic motives of biotic resources management. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 14 (1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaoue, O.G., M.A. Coe, M. Bond, G. Hart, B.C. Seyler, and H. McMillen. 2017. Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Economic Botany 71 (3): 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Frapolli, E., V.M. Toledo, and J. Martinez-Alier. 2008. Adaptations of a Yucatec Maya multiple-use ecological management strategy to ecotourism. Ecology and Society 13 (2): 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, P.R.W. 2010. Perspectivas campesinas sobre el manejo de los recursos naturales. México, D.F.: Mundiprensa, Universidad de Guadalajara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, A.R., and K.S. Bawa. 1993. The economic value and sustainable harvest of plants and animals from the tropical forest: Assumptions, hypotheses, and methods. Economic Botany 47 (3): 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Cruz, G., E. García-Frapolli, A. Casas, and J.M. Dupuy. 2015. Responding to disturbances : Lessons from a Mayan social-ecological system. International Journal of the Commons 9 (2): 831–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R.K., M. Pai, B. Muraca, and K.M.A. Chan. 2019. He ʻike ʻana ia i ka pono (it is a recognizing of the right thing): How one indigenous worldview informs relational values and social values. Sustainability Science 14 (5): 1213–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R.K., and P.W. Schultz. 2021. Challenges to understanding nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature connections, and how to address them. Ecology and Society 26 (3): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. 2013. Overview of agricultural biodiversity and its importance to nutrition and health. In Diversifying food and diets, ed. Y. Fanzo, D. Hunter, T. Borelli, and F. Mattei, 35–67. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidayat, S., B.A.A. Ghani, B. Giridharan, M.Z. Hassan, and F.M. Franco. 2018. Using ethnotaxonomy to assess traditonal knowledge and language vitality: A case study with the vaie people of Sarawak, Malaysia. Ethnobiology Letters 9 (2): 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himes, A., and B. Muraca. 2018. Relational values: The key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI. 2020. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, México. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/cpv/2020. Accessed 21 July 2021.

  • Jacobs, S., B. Martín-López, D.N. Barton, R. Dunford, P.A. Harrison, E. Kelemen, H. Saarikoski, M. Termansen, M. García-Llorente, R. Gómez-Baggethun, L. Kopperoinen, S. Luque, I.M. Palomo, J.A. Priess, G.M. Rusch, P. Tenerelli, F. Turkelboom, R. Demeyer, J. Hauck, H. Keune, and R. Smith. 2018. The means determine the end—Pursuing integrated valuation in practice. Ecosystem Services 29: 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., and D. Tobin. 2018. Reciprocity, redistribution and relational values: Organizing and motivating sustainable agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, J., and D. Harmon. 2005. A global index of biocultural diversity. Ecological Indicators 5 (3): 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Bárcenas, F. 2017. El régimen de la propiedad agraria en México: Primeros auxilios jurídicos para la defensa de la tierra y los recursos naturales. México: Centro de Orientación y Asesoría a Pueblos Indígenas A.C., Centro de Estudios para el Cambio en el Campo Mexicano, Instituto Mexicano para el Desarrollo Comunitario A.C., EDUCA A.C.

  • Mapes, C., and F. Basurto. 2016. Biodiversity and edible plants of Mexico. In Ethnobotany of Mexico, ed. R. Lira, A. Casas, and J. Blancas, 83–132. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroy-Sais, S., A. Castillo, E. García-Frapolli, and G. Ibarra-Manríquez. 2016. Ecological Variability and Rule-Making Processes for Forest Management Institutions: A Social-Ecological Case Study in the Jalisco Coast, Mexico. International Journal of the Commons 10 (2): 1144–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroy-Sais, S., E. García-Frapolli, F. Mora, M. Skutsch, A. Casas, P. Gerritsen, and D. González-Jiménez. 2018. Exploring how land tenure affects farmers’ landscape values: Evidence from a choice experiment. Sustainability 10 (4321): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Calles, A.I., A. Casas, E. García-Frapolli, and I. Torres-García. 2011. Traditional agroforestry systems of multi-crop “Milpa” and “Chichipera” cactus forest in the Arid Tehuacán Valley, Mexico: Their management and role in people’s subsistence. Agroforestry Systems 84 (2): 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Calles, A.I., A. Casas, V.M. Toledo, and M. Vallejo-Ramos, eds. 2016. Etnoagroforestería en México. Ciudad de México, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Calles, A.I., V.M. Toledo, and A. Casas. 2014. Importancia biocultural de los sistemas agroforestales tradicionales de México. In Hacia un Modelo Intercultural de Sociedad del Conocimiento en México, ed. L. Olive and L. Lazos-Ramírez, 35–56. Ciudad de México, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, F.A., A.N. Vega, A.N. García-Aldrete, and M. and Quesada-Avedaño, eds. 2002. Historia natural de chamela. Ciudad de México, México: Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. 1992. The varieties of intrinsic value. The Monist 75 (2): 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, U., P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, G. Pataki, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R.T. Watson, M. Islar, E. Kelemen, M. Quaas, S.M. Subramanian, A.A. Mohamed, S. Ahn, Y.S. Al-Hafedh, E. Amankwah, S.T. Asah, P. Berry, A. Bilgin, S.J. Breslow, C. Bullock, C.D. Golden, E. Go, O. Farrell, R. Pandit, W. Pengue, F. Popa, S. Preston, D. Pacheco-Balanza, H. Saarikoski, B.B. Strassburg, M. van den Belt, M. Verma, F. Wickson, and N. Yagi. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 20 (1): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perales, H., and J. R. Aguirre. 2008. Biodiversidad humanizada. In Capital Natural de México, vol. I: Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad, 565–603. Ciudad de México, México: CONABIO.

  • R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangel-Landa, S., A. Casas, E. Rivera-Lozoya, I. Torres-García, and M. Vallejo-Ramos. 2016. Ixcatec ethnoecology: Plant management and biocultural heritage in Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 12 (1): 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C.M., and J.O. Kenter. 2016. Assessing and applying transcendental values to the management of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 21: 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García, V., T. Huanca, V. Vadez, W. Leonard, and D. Wilkie. 2006. Cultural, Practical, and Economic Value of Wild Plants: A Quantitative Study in the Bolivian Amazon. Economic Botany 60 (1): 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Villarreal, E. 2016. Árboles de Minatitlán, Colima: guía de usos tradicionales. Colima, México: Secretaría de Cultura del Gobierno del estado de Colima.

  • Schroeder, N.M., and A. Castillo. 2012. Collective action in the management of a tropical dry forest ecosystem: Effects of Mexico’s property rights regime. Environmental Management 51 (4): 850–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheremata, M. 2018. Listening to relational values in the era of rapid environmental change in the Inuit Nunangat. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, D., E.H. Belarmino, and J. Kolodinsky. 2020. Introduction to the special issue: More than value$ in the food system. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 9 (4): 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, V.M., B. Ortiz-Espejel, L. Cortés, P. Moguel, and M.J. Ordoñez. 2003. The multiple use of tropical forests by indigenous peoples in Mexico: A case of adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 7 (3): 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N.J. 1988. “The Importance of a Rose”: Evaluating the cultural significance of plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. American Anthropologist 90 (2): 272–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N.J., and J. Bhattacharyya. 2016. Salmonberry bird and goose woman: Birds, plants, and people in indigenous peoples’ lifeways in Northwestern North America. Journal of Ethnobiology 36 (4): 717–745.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges the Graduate Program in Biological Science of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, and CONACYT for the PhD scholarship received, to support the realization of this study. We are very grateful to the people of the ejido Pabelo and the community of Cuzalapa who participated on the workshops and from whom we learn more than expected. We also thank to the fieldwork team for their exceptional support to run the workshops, to Anna Paizanni, Azucena Mastache and Georgina Torres. Special thanks to David González-Jiménez for his conceptual insights and recommendations and to Sarah Bologna for the English editing of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by UNAM-PAPIIT IN300514 and IN302517.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo García-Frapolli.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monroy-Sais, S., García-Frapolli, E., Casas, A. et al. Relational values and management of plant resources in two communities in a highly biodiverse area in western Mexico. Agric Hum Values 39, 1231–1244 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10313-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10313-6

Keywords

Navigation