Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Molotov Milkshake: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Market

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates links between the final scene—the milkshake scene—of P. T. Anderson’s film, ‘There Will Be Blood’, and a commercial advertisement for the sale of oil, which relies on a milkshake drinking analogy. The comparison probes a tension between the aspiration for capitalist economic growth and the self-regulation of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Business figures committed to the practice of CSR struggle with the possibility that deeper, systemic forms of violence inherent in market competition supersede their attempts at installing more responsible cycles of economic exchange. A risk remains, all the while, that social and environmental concern of the kind expressed in CSR is only able to acquire ‘value’ in the market, a relational or ‘dialectical’ system of exchange, where it meets contrasting cycles or events in the market: the value of alternatives (e.g. ‘going green’) is predicated on pre-existing products or earlier cycles of marketisation. The article discusses difficulties that CSR creates in terms of making interventions and raising conflict with corporate actors, and a tendency for the system to leave inert, exposed or abandoned, those that try. The capacity of CSR to eradicate the more vicious shadow of capitalist markets is challenged in the article. There is no release, the author argues, in a concept that is so essentially dependent on market mechanisms and on competitively motivated (ex)change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The milkshake concept Anderson extracted from a transcript of the 1924 congressional hearings over the Teapot Dome scandal, in which Senator Albert Fall was convicted of accepting bribes for drilling rights to public lands in Wyoming and California. During the testimony the Senator used the analogy of drinking a milkshake to explain to the hearing how oil was extracted from adjoining lands. See Foundas (2008) and Bowles (2008).

  2. Stage Direction.

  3. The term ‘enlightened’ is central to how CSR is institutionalised in the UK, as the pursuit of ‘enlightened shareholder value’, or ESV, whereby company directors are bound to promote the success of the company for the shareholders benefit as a whole, but in doing so, must have regard to a non-exhaustive list of wider factors, including the long term, company employees, suppliers, the impact of activities on community and the environment. See, s172 Companies Act 2006 and for an overview of ESV in the UK, Keay (2007).

  4. The European Commission define CSR as ‘a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis’. See European Commission (2001, 2006).

  5. Social and environmental reporting is a key aspect of market-led CSR. By asking companies to report on social and ecological impacts, a market relative to the CSR performance of companies is operationalised: the information is supposed to allow members of the public to choose knowledgeably between products and services on the basis of social and environmental criteria. See s417 Companies Act 2006 and for an overview, Villiers (2006).

  6. The purchase of products or services with a view to achieving non-economic goals (social, ecological or political); ‘buycott’ as a form ‘positive political consumerism’. See Micheletti (2003, p. 50).

  7. Baudrillard would seem to be distinguishing his thesis from Thorstein Veblen’s thesis on ‘conspicuous consumption’, here. See Veblen (1899) an early influence on Baudrillard (1998).

  8. The power to deepen and extend the markets is attributed to the ‘discontent’ here, rather than the ‘disinterested’ masses (the group usually accused of deepening consumption); ‘conscious raising’ and ‘raising of the unconscious’ is the source of extended productivity for Baudrillard. See Baudrillard (1994 p. 86, 2007, pp. 33–77).

  9. On the parallels between Agamben and Baudrillard, both identifying a seeming slide into the ‘inhuman’ see Coulter (2005).

  10. On the multiple trajectories according to which life is valorised and non-valorised in market society, see, reading Agamben, Barkan (2009).

  11. Agamben is emphatic: ‘law is made of nothing but what it manages to capture inside itself through the inclusive exclusion of the exception: it nourishes itself on this exception and is a dead letter without it’ (Agamben 1998, p. 27).

  12. The same figures also appear in Simulacra and Simulation, where they are figures ‘marked out no longer worthy of our justice but only of our affection and social charity,’ and ‘no longer worthy of our punishment and death but only of experimentation and extermination’. Baudrillard (1994, p. 135).

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. Means without end: Notes on politics. In Theory out of bounds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Anderson, Paul Thomas. 2008. There will be blood, Final Script. Scribd. http://www.scribd.com/doc/2083473/There-Will-Be-Blood-Final-Script. Accessed 14 Dec 2010.

  • Barkan, Joshua. 2009. Use beyond value: Giorgio Agamben and a critique of capitalism. Rethinking Marxism 21(2): 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1973. The mirror of production. New York: Telos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1990. Revenge of the crystal: Selected writings on the modern object and its destiny. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1998. The consumer society: Myths and structures. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 2007. In the shadow of the silent majorities. Semiotext(e): Los Angeles, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 1988. Freedom. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 2007. Consuming life. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Scott. 2008. ‘Blood’ fans drink up milkshake catch-phrase. USA Today. 3 Feb 2008.

  • Coulter, Gerry. 2005. Intersections and divergences in contemporary theory: Baudrillard and Agamben on politics and the daunting questions of our time. International Journal of Baudrillard Studies, 2(2).

  • European Commission. 2001. Promoting a European framework for CSR. COM 366.

  • European Commission. 2006. Implementing the partnership for growth and jobs: Making Europe a pole of excellence on corporate social responsibility. COM 136 final, 2.

  • Foundas, Scott. 2008. Paul Thomas Anderson: Blood, sweat and tears. LA Weekly. 16 Jan 2008.

  • Frank, Thomas, and Matt Weiland (eds.). 1997. Commodify your dissent: Salvos from the baffler. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Bill. 1995. The road ahead. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Joseph, and Andrew Potter. 2005. The rebel sell. Chichester: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, Andrew. 2007. Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006: An interpretation and assessment. Company Lawyer 28.

  • Micheletti, Michelle. 2003. Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, Michelle, and Dietland Stolle. 2008. Fashioning social justice through political consumerism, capitalism and the internet. Cultural Studies 22(5): 749–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell. 2007. ‘Eureka’. TV Commercial, currently hosted on YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7mfDEJRslY. Accessed 14 Dec 2010.

  • Supiot, Alain. 2008. ‘L’europe gagnée par ‘l’économie communiste de marché.’ Revue du MAUSS permanente January, available at: http://www.journaldumauss.net/spip.php?article283. Accessed 30 Dec 2010.

  • Veblen, Thorstein. 1899. The theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villiers, Charlotte. 2006. Corporate reporting and company law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, Slavoj. 2002. A plea for Leninist intolerance. Critical Inquiry, Winter 2002.

  • Zizek, Slavoj. 2006. Nobody has to be vile. London Review of Books, 28(7), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, Slavoj. 2008. Violence: Six sideways reflections. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. M. Moncrieff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moncrieff, L.M. The Molotov Milkshake: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Market. Law Critique 22, 273–293 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-011-9092-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-011-9092-3

Keywords

Navigation