References
Amin, S. (1989).Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Bernstein, R. (1983).Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Dews, P. (1987).Logics of disintegration: Post-structuralist thought and the claims of critical theory. London: Verso.
Feher, J. (1984). On surrender, death, and the sociology of knowledge.Human Studies 7(2): 211–226.
Foucault, M. (1980a).Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1980b).The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1984). What is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.)The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.
Fuss, D. (1989).Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature, and difference. New York/London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gates, Jr., H.L. (1985). Editor's introduction: Writing “race” and the difference it makes.Critical Inquiry 12 (Autumn): 1–20.
Gouldner, A. (1970).The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Grayson, J.H. (1989).Korea: A religious history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gusfield, J. (1967). Tradition and modernity: Misplaced polarities in the study of social change.American Journal of Sociology 72 (4): 351–362.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1956).Lectures on the philosophy of history. Trans. I. Sibree. New York: Dover.
Johnson, T., Dandeker, C. and Ashworth, C. (1984).The structure of social theory: Dilemmas and strategies. London: Macmillan.
Kant, I. (1949). What is Enlightenment? InThe philosophy of Kant: Immanuel Kant's moral and political writings. New York: The Modern Library.
Khaldun, I. (1974).The Mugaddimah: An introduction to history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Knorr-Cetina, and Cicourel, A.V. (Eds.) (1981).Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mani, L. (1987). “Contentious traditions: The debates on SATI in colonial India,”Cultural Critique 3 (Fall): 119–156.
Marx, K. (1978). In imperialism in India. In R.C. Tucker (Ed.),The Marx-Engels reader. New York/London: Norton.
Marx, K. (1978). Europocentric world revolution. InThe Marx-Engels reader.
Mokrzycki, E. (1983).Philosophy of science and sociology: From methodological doctrine to research practice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Moon, S. (1990). Sexual politics in the construction and perpetuation of Confucian womanhood in Korea: Continuity and discontinuity. Unpublished.
Panikaar, K.M. (1969).Asia and Western dominance. New York: Collier Books.
Rodney, W. (1981).How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.
Said, E. (1979).Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
Suzuki, S. (1989).Zen mind, beginner's mind. New York/Tokyo: Weatherhill.
Thick Nhat Hanh. (1987).Being peace. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.
Wolff, K.H. (1976).Surrender and catch: Experience and inquiry today. Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel Publishing Co.
Wolff, K.H. (1977). Toward understanding the radicalness of surrender.Sociological Analysis 38(4): 397–401.
Wolff, K.H. (1983).Beyond the sociology of knowledge: An introduction and a development. Lanhan/New York/London: University Press of America.
Wolff, K.H. (1984). Surrender-and-catch and phenomenology.Human Studies 7(2): 191–210.
Wolff, K.H. (1986). Exploring relations between surrender-and-catch and poetry, sociology, evil.Human Studies 9(4): 347–364.
Wolff, K.H. (1988). The idea of surrender-and-catch applied to the phenomenon Karl Mannheim.Theory, Culture & Society 5(4): 715–734.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I wish to express my gratitude to Kurt H. Wolff for his support and to Farzin Vahdat for his patient reading and comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moon, S. Eurocentric elements in the idea of “surrender-and-catch”. Hum Stud 16, 305–317 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323139
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323139