Abstract
This paper concerns the Russian émigrée translator and philosopher Natalie Duddington (1886–1972). By establishing Duddington’s dependence on Nicholas Lossky (1870–1965), the paper argues that Duddington formed a unique synthesis of Russian intuitivism and British realism in her essay ‘Our Knowledge of Other Minds’. Despite the historical significance of Duddington’s work, it will be concluded that her synthesis succumbs to the most recent criticism which has been posed against perceptualists such as Fred Dretske (1932–2013). Russian ‘intuitivism’ is understood here as the school of thought that was first developed by Lossky and subsequently inherited by Duddington. ‘Perceptualism’ will be understood as the broad claim that we perceive the contents of another mind in an immediate way rather than infer them.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Duddington most likely learned some German at the women’s courses she attended in St Petersburg, where German was offered (Feodosova 1980, p. 77). Her knowledge of other German philosophers, however, seems to be scarce. Aside from some superficial references to Fichte in some other papers (1926b, p. 377), Duddington does not seem to have engaged seriously with German philosophy. It thus seems that, overall, Duddington’s knowledge of German philosophy was limited to Lipps, who seems to have attracted her precisely because of his work on knowledge of other minds. Any further acquaintance with German philosophy would have been via Lossky, who himself had a much more extensive knowledge of German philosophy (Nemeth 2017, pp. 314–321).
Duddington’s theory could also be compared here with a particular approach to the so-called ‘descriptive’ problem of other minds. The descriptive problem looks at empirical data to understand how we come to acquire the ability to ascribe mental states to others. This problem differs from the normative problem which asks, for example, how we are justified in knowing other minds (both their contents and that they exist) (Avramides 2019a). It was, of course, the normative problem which occupied Duddington. However, one particular approach to the descriptive problem bears some resemblance to Duddington’s theory. Shaun Gallagher rejects the two prevalent accounts of how infants begin to interact with others, the first suggests we theoretically postulate the mental states of others (theory theory), the second claims we simulate another’s mind using our own mind as the model (simulation theory). Gallagher (2001), however, shows that for both of these processes to take place, a complex ‘background understanding’ (p. 86) of the other is already required, we have to have some idea of the other as a subject (otherwise there is nothing to theorise about or simulate). He thus favours a less inferential model, which is comparable with Duddington’s perceptualism: ‘The action of the infant and the perceived action of the other person are coded in the same “language”, a cross-modal system that is directly attuned to the actions and gestures of other humans’ (p. 87).
References
Avramides, Anita 2001. Other minds. London: Routledge.
Avramides, Anita 2019a. Other minds. In Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy, eds. E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/other-minds/.
Avramides, Anita 2019b. Perception, reliability, and other minds. In Knowing other minds, eds. A. Avramides and M. Parrott, 107–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ayer, Alfred Jules 1953. One’s knowledge of other minds. Theoria 19: 1–20.
Bonjour, Laurence 2010. Against materialism. In The waning of materialism, eds. R. Koons and G. Bealer, 3–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cassam, Quassim. 2007. The possibility of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, David 1996. The conscious mind. In Search of a fundamental theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dretske, Fred 1969. Seeing and knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dretske, Fred 1973. Perception and other minds. Noûs 7: 34–44.
Duddington, Natalie 1919. Our knowledge of other minds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 19: 147–178.
Duddington, Natalie 1926a. Philosophy in Russia. Journal of Philosophical Studies 1: 100–103.
Duddington, Natalie 1926b. Philosophy in Russia. Journal of Philosophical Studies 1: 367–379.
Duddington, Natalie 1928. Philosophy in Russia. Journal of Philosophical Studies 3: 516–518.
Duddington, Natalie 1933. The philosophy of N. Lossky. The Dublin Review 192: 233–244.
Ermishin, Oleg 2022. Nikolai O. Lossky’s intuitivism and personalism in the context of Russian philosophy. Russian Studies in Philosophy 60: 302–309.
Feodosova, Elmira 1980. Bestuzhevskie Kursy—Pervyi Zhenskyi univesitet v Rossii [The Bestuzhev courses—the first female university in Russia]. Moscow: Pedagogika.
Gallagher, Shaun 2001. The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 83–108.
Gershenzon, Mikhail 1909. Mirovozrenie A. I. Ertelia [The worldview of A. I. Ertel]. In Pis’ma A. I. Ertelia [The letters of A. I. Ertel], ed. Mikhail Gershenzon, i–xxiv. Moscow: I. D. Sytina.
Gomes, Anil 2019. Perception, evidence, and our expressive knowledge of others’ minds. In Knowing other minds, eds. A. Avramides and M. Parrott, 148–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, Dawes. 1917. The basis of critical realism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 17(1): 300–359.
Hyslop, Alec 1995. Other minds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Large, Duncan 2018. The translation of philosophical texts. In The Routledge handbook of translation and philosophy, eds. P. Rawling and P. Wilson. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lavazza, Andrea, and Howard Robinson. 2014. Contemporary dualism: A defence. London: Routledge.
Lipps, Theodore 1907. Das Wissen von fremden Ichen. Psychologischen Untersuchungen 1: 694–722.
Lossky, Nicholas 1919. The intuitive basis of knowledge: An epistemological inquiry. Trans. N. Duddington. London: Macmillan & Co..
Lossky, Nicholas 1928. The world as an organic whole. Trans N. Duddington. London: Oxford University Press.
Lossky, Nicholas 1948. Perception of other selves. The Personalist 29: 149–162.
Lossky, Nicholas 1951. History of Russian philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Lossky, Nicholas 1991. Izbrannoe [selected works]. Moscow: Pravda.
Maslenova, Anna 2022. Natalie Duddington’s religious translations from Russian: Faith in translation. Paralléles 34: 118–129.
Nemeth, Thomas. 2017. Kant in imperial Russia. Cham: Springer.
Overgaard, Søren 2019. Embodiment and social perception. In Knowing other minds, eds. A. Avramides and M. Parrott, 127–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pargetter, Robert 1984. The scientific inference to other minds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 158–163.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1996. Last writings on the philosophy of psychology. Trans. C. G. Luckhardt, and Maximilian A. E. Aue. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Wright, Crispin 1984. Second thoughts about criteria. Synthese 58: 383–405.
Zenkovskii, Vasily 2001. Istoriia russkoi filosofii [History of Russian philosophy]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Projekt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, H.J. Natalie Duddington and perceptual knowledge of other minds. Stud East Eur Thought (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09592-4
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09592-4