Skip to main content
Log in

Natalie Duddington and perceptual knowledge of other minds

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns the Russian émigrée translator and philosopher Natalie Duddington (1886–1972). By establishing Duddington’s dependence on Nicholas Lossky (1870–1965), the paper argues that Duddington formed a unique synthesis of Russian intuitivism and British realism in her essay ‘Our Knowledge of Other Minds’. Despite the historical significance of Duddington’s work, it will be concluded that her synthesis succumbs to the most recent criticism which has been posed against perceptualists such as Fred Dretske (1932–2013). Russian ‘intuitivism’ is understood here as the school of thought that was first developed by Lossky and subsequently inherited by Duddington. ‘Perceptualism’ will be understood as the broad claim that we perceive the contents of another mind in an immediate way rather than infer them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Duddington most likely learned some German at the women’s courses she attended in St Petersburg, where German was offered (Feodosova 1980, p. 77). Her knowledge of other German philosophers, however, seems to be scarce. Aside from some superficial references to Fichte in some other papers (1926b, p. 377), Duddington does not seem to have engaged seriously with German philosophy. It thus seems that, overall, Duddington’s knowledge of German philosophy was limited to Lipps, who seems to have attracted her precisely because of his work on knowledge of other minds. Any further acquaintance with German philosophy would have been via Lossky, who himself had a much more extensive knowledge of German philosophy (Nemeth 2017, pp. 314–321).

  2. Duddington’s theory could also be compared here with a particular approach to the so-called ‘descriptive’ problem of other minds. The descriptive problem looks at empirical data to understand how we come to acquire the ability to ascribe mental states to others. This problem differs from the normative problem which asks, for example, how we are justified in knowing other minds (both their contents and that they exist) (Avramides 2019a). It was, of course, the normative problem which occupied Duddington. However, one particular approach to the descriptive problem bears some resemblance to Duddington’s theory. Shaun Gallagher rejects the two prevalent accounts of how infants begin to interact with others, the first suggests we theoretically postulate the mental states of others (theory theory), the second claims we simulate another’s mind using our own mind as the model (simulation theory). Gallagher (2001), however, shows that for both of these processes to take place, a complex ‘background understanding’ (p. 86) of the other is already required, we have to have some idea of the other as a subject (otherwise there is nothing to theorise about or simulate). He thus favours a less inferential model, which is comparable with Duddington’s perceptualism: ‘The action of the infant and the perceived action of the other person are coded in the same “language”, a cross-modal system that is directly attuned to the actions and gestures of other humans’ (p. 87).

References

  • Avramides, Anita 2001. Other minds. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avramides, Anita 2019a. Other minds. In Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy, eds. E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/other-minds/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avramides, Anita 2019b. Perception, reliability, and other minds. In Knowing other minds, eds. A. Avramides and M. Parrott, 107–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, Alfred Jules 1953. One’s knowledge of other minds. Theoria 19: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonjour, Laurence 2010. Against materialism. In The waning of materialism, eds. R. Koons and G. Bealer, 3–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cassam, Quassim. 2007. The possibility of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, David 1996. The conscious mind. In Search of a fundamental theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, Fred 1969. Seeing and knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, Fred 1973. Perception and other minds. Noûs 7: 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duddington, Natalie 1919. Our knowledge of other minds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 19: 147–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duddington, Natalie 1926a. Philosophy in Russia. Journal of Philosophical Studies 1: 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duddington, Natalie 1926b. Philosophy in Russia. Journal of Philosophical Studies 1: 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duddington, Natalie 1928. Philosophy in Russia. Journal of Philosophical Studies 3: 516–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duddington, Natalie 1933. The philosophy of N. Lossky. The Dublin Review 192: 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermishin, Oleg 2022. Nikolai O. Lossky’s intuitivism and personalism in the context of Russian philosophy. Russian Studies in Philosophy 60: 302–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feodosova, Elmira 1980. Bestuzhevskie Kursy—Pervyi Zhenskyi univesitet v Rossii [The Bestuzhev courses—the first female university in Russia]. Moscow: Pedagogika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun 2001. The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon, Mikhail 1909. Mirovozrenie A. I. Ertelia [The worldview of A. I. Ertel]. In Pis’ma A. I. Ertelia [The letters of A. I. Ertel], ed. Mikhail Gershenzon, i–xxiv. Moscow: I. D. Sytina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, Anil 2019. Perception, evidence, and our expressive knowledge of others’ minds. In Knowing other minds, eds. A. Avramides and M. Parrott, 148–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Dawes. 1917. The basis of critical realism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 17(1): 300–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop, Alec 1995. Other minds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Large, Duncan 2018. The translation of philosophical texts. In The Routledge handbook of translation and philosophy, eds. P. Rawling and P. Wilson. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavazza, Andrea, and Howard Robinson. 2014. Contemporary dualism: A defence. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, Theodore 1907. Das Wissen von fremden Ichen. Psychologischen Untersuchungen 1: 694–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lossky, Nicholas 1919. The intuitive basis of knowledge: An epistemological inquiry. Trans. N. Duddington. London: Macmillan & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Lossky, Nicholas 1928. The world as an organic whole. Trans N. Duddington. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lossky, Nicholas 1948. Perception of other selves. The Personalist 29: 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lossky, Nicholas 1951. History of Russian philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lossky, Nicholas 1991. Izbrannoe [selected works]. Moscow: Pravda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslenova, Anna 2022. Natalie Duddington’s religious translations from Russian: Faith in translation. Paralléles 34: 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, Thomas. 2017. Kant in imperial Russia. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Overgaard, Søren 2019. Embodiment and social perception. In Knowing other minds, eds. A. Avramides and M. Parrott, 127–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pargetter, Robert 1984. The scientific inference to other minds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1996. Last writings on the philosophy of psychology. Trans. C. G. Luckhardt, and Maximilian A. E. Aue. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Crispin 1984. Second thoughts about criteria. Synthese 58: 383–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenkovskii, Vasily 2001. Istoriia russkoi filosofii [History of Russian philosophy]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Projekt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry James Moore.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, H.J. Natalie Duddington and perceptual knowledge of other minds. Stud East Eur Thought (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09592-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09592-4

Keywords

Navigation