Abstract
An influential view of sexual morality claims that participant consent is sufficient for the moral permissibility of a sexual act. I argue that the complex and frequently dark nature of sexual desire precludes this, because some sexual desire has a character such that it should not be gratified, even if this were consented to. I illustrate this with a discussion of a famous literary character, the Vicomte de Valmont, and draw on Kant's anthropology to illuminate the nature of such desire, before offering an account of its psychological roots. In the course of the paper I explain why the view of sexual desire endorsed by my main opponents is mistaken, and attack the limited conception of the normative which is a central plank in the argument of a prominent recent defender of the view, Igor Primoratz.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Denis, L., Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1997), pp. 321–348.
Dworkin, A., Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London: The Women's Press, 1981.
Dworkin, A., Intercourse. London: Martin Secker and Warburg Limited, 1987.
Goldman, A., Plain Sex, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(3) (1977), pp. 267–287.
Herman, B., The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Kant, I., Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. V.L. Dowdell. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978.
Kant, I., Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Intent, trans. T. Humphreys, in Perpetual Peace and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983.
Kant, I., Religion Within the Bounds Of Mere Reason, trans. G. di Giovanni, in A. Wood and G. di Giovanni (eds.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kant, I. Lectures on Ethics, trans. P. Heath, in P. Heath and J. Schneewind (eds.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Kant, I., The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Morgan, S., Sex in the Head, Journal of Applied Philosophy 20(1) (2003), pp. 1–16.
Nagel, T., Sexual Perversion, in Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, pp. 39–52.
Primoratz, I., Ethics and Sex. London: Routledge, 1999.
Primoratz, I., Sexual Morality: Is Consent Enough?, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4(3) (2001), pp. 201–218.
Scanlon, T., What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.
Scruton. R., Sexual Desire. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1986.
Sherman, N., Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Wood. A., Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morgan, S. Dark Desires. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6, 377–410 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETTA.0000004638.15926.1a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETTA.0000004638.15926.1a