Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

We Can Work it Out: The Importance of Rupture and Repair Processes in Infancy and Adult Life for Flourishing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that insights into infant emotional development, particularly the capacity to engage with rupture and repair, can be applied to the understanding and promotion of flourishing in later life, individually and socially. Starting with the Queen’s visit to the Republic of Ireland as an example of successful social repair after rupture that enables flourishing, the paper goes on to outline some relevant psychological theory that undergirds this. It then considers some of the practical relevance and problems that apply to rupture and repair in the contemporary world, particularly the world of health care, Amidst the inevitable messiness of life, flourishing and growth can only be achieved with the kind of flexibility implied by creating repair in the face of rupture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). (2014). Queen wraps up ‘astonishing’ Ireland visit. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-05-21/queen-wraps-up-astonishing-ireland-visit/2723410. Accessed 8 Dec 2014.

  2. Bates, S., & McDonald, H. (2011). Irish eyes are smiling: Show of respect turns Queen into runaway favourite. Guardian Newspaper. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/may/19/queen-ireland-visit-respect-adams. Accessed 8 Dec 2014.

  3. Beeghly, M., & Troncik, E. (2011). Early resilience in the context of parent-infant relationships: A social developmental perspective. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 4(7), 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berwick D. (2013). A promise to learn. A commitment to act. Department of Health. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226703/Berwick_Report.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2015.

  5. Di Corcia, J., & Tronick, E. (2011). Quotidian resilience: Exploring mechanisms that drive resilience from a perspective of everyday stress and coping. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1593–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edmondson, A. (2004). Learning from failure in health care: Frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 13, ii3–ii9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Field, T., Healy, B., Goldstein, S., Perry, S., Bendell, D., Schanberg, S., et al. (1988). Infants of depressed mothers show “depressed” behaviour even with nondepressed adults. Child Development, 59(6), 1569–1579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fogel, A. (2000). Systems, attachment and relationships. Human Development, 43, 314–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogel, A. (2011). Theoretical and applied dynamic systems research in developmental science. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678–686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Haskayne, D., et al. (2014). What are the experiences of therapeutic rupture and repair for clients and therapists within long-term psychodynamic therapy? British Journal of Psychotherapy, 30(1), 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins M. D. (2014). Address to UK parliament by President of Ireland, Michael D. Higgins—Tuesday 8 April 2014. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-information-office/2014/address-to-parliament-Irish-president-michael-d-higgins.pdf. Accessed 8 Dec 2014.

  13. Lewis, J. (2000). Repairing the bond in important relationships: A dynamic for personality maturation. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1375–1378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maben, J., Latter, S., & Macleod Clark, J. (2007). The sustainability of ideals, values and the nursing mandate: Evidence from a longitudinal qualitative study. Nursing Inquiry, 14(2), 99–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Merrick J. (2011). Hats off, Ma’am! The Queen in Ireland. The inside story of a diplomatic coup. Independent 22.5.2011. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/hats-off-maam-the-queen-in-ireland-the-inside-story-of-a-diplomatic-coup-2287454.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2014.

  16. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2012). The science of neglect: The Persistent absence of responsive care disrupts the developing brain. Working Paper 12. Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University. http://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/reports_and_working_papers/working_papers/wp12/. Accessed 20 Apr 2015.

  17. Nitsun, M. (1996). The anti-group. Destructive forces in the group and their creative potential: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Skowron, E., et al. (2010). Differentiation, self-other representations and rupture-repair processes: Predicting child maltreatment risk. The Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(3), 304–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steven, A., Magnusson, C., Smith, P., & Pearson, P. (2014). Patient safety in nursing education: Contexts, tensions and feeling safe to learn. Nurse Education Today, 34(2), 277–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stolorow, R. (1997). Dynamic, dyadic, intersubjective systems: An evolving paradigm for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 14(3), 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Suchman, A. (2011). Organizations as machines, organizations as conversations: Two core metaphors and their consequences. Medical Care, 49, s43–s48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tronick, E. (2004). Why is connection with others so critical? Dyadic meaning making, messiness, and complexity governed selective processes which co-create and expand individuals’ states of consciousness. In J. Nadel & D. Muir (Eds.), Emotional development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tronick. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. W.W. Norton & Company. Weblink to Still Face Experiment: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apzXGEbZht0).

  24. Tronick, E., & Beeghly, M. (2011). Infants’ meaning-making and the development of mental health. American Psychologist, 66(2), 107–119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Weinberg, M. K., Olson, K., Beeghly, M., & Tronick, E. (2006). Making up is hard to do, especially for mothers with high levels of depressive symptoms and their infant sons. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(7), 670–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitener, E., Brodt, S., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dynamic Psychotherapy, NHS Forth Valley, Falkirk, Scotland, UK

    Mary Morton

Authors
  1. Mary Morton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Morton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morton, M. We Can Work it Out: The Importance of Rupture and Repair Processes in Infancy and Adult Life for Flourishing. Health Care Anal 24, 119–132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-016-0319-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-016-0319-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation