Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics committees across a continuum of care

  • Articles
  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Ethical issues in health care system reform.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994; 272:1056–62.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schiff G, Bindman A, Brennan T. A better-quality alternative: Single-payer national health system reform.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994; 272:803–807.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berwick D. Eleven worthy aims for clinical leadership of health system reform.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994; 272:797–801.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker E, Melton R, Stange P,et al. Health reform and the health of the public: Forging community health partnerships.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994; 272:1276–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lutheran General HealthSystem.Continuum of care purpose statements. Park Ridge, IL, 1994.

  6. Brock D, Daniels N. Ethical foundations of the Clinton administration's proposed health care system.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994; 271:1189–96.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wolf S. Ethics committees and due process: Nesting rights in a community of caring.Maryland Law Review. 1991; 50 (3):798–857.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman D. Evaluating ethics committees: A view from the outside.Milbank Quarterly. 1993; 71 (4):677–99.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher J, Hoffman D. Ethics committees: Time to experiment with standards.The Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994; 120:335–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wolf S. Quality assessment of ethics in health care: The accountability revolution.American Journal of Law and Medicine. 1994; 20 (1,2):105–28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Callopy B, Dubler N, Zuckerman C. The ethics of home care: Autonomy and accommodation.Hastings Center Report. 1990; 20 (2):S1-S16.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jennings B, Callahan D, Caplan A. Ethical challenges of chronic illness.Hastings Center Report. 1988; 18 (1):S1-S16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Callopy B. Ethical dimensions of autonomy in long-term care.Generations. 1990; 14 (suppl.):9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Glasser G, Zweibel N, Cassel C. The ethics committee in the nursing home: Results of a national survey.Journal of the American Geriatric Society. 1988; 36:150–56.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moss R, La Puma J. The ethics of mechanical restraints.Hastings Center Report. 1991; 21 (1):22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moss R, La Puma J. The ethics of pressure sore prevention and treatment in the elderly: A practical approach.Journal of the American Geriatric Society. 1991; 39:906–908.

    Google Scholar 

  17. La Puma J, Orentlicher D, Moss R. Advance directives on admission: Clinical implications and analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1991; 266:402–405.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reagen M. Physicians as gatekeepers: A complex challenge.New England Journal of Medicine. 1987; 317:1731–33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Veatch R. Professional ethics vs. cost containment: The inevitable clash.The Internist. 1991; June:9–11, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Angell M. The doctor as double agent.Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 1993; 3 (3):279–86.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Daniels N. Why saying no to patients in the United States is so hard.New England Journal of Medicine. 1986; 314:1380–83.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sulmasy D. Physicians, cost control and ethics.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992; 116:920–25.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mirvis D. Physician's autonomy - physicians' authority - the relation between public and professional expectations.New England Journal of Medicine. 1993; 328:1346–49.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dubler N. Individual advocacy as a governing principle.Journal of Case Management. 1992; 1 (3):82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holleman W, Edwards D, Matson C. Obligations of physicians to patients and third-party payers.The Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1994; 5 (2):113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pellegrino E. Ethics.Journal of the Americal Medical Association. 1994; 271:1668–69.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lincoln T. Traveling the new information highway.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1994; 271:1955–56.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wolf S. Health care reform and the future of physician ethics.Hastings Center Report. 1994; 24 (2):28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Purtilo, R. Interdisciplinary health care teams and health care reform.The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 1994; 22 (2):121–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Robert Moss M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, R. Ethics committees across a continuum of care. HEC Forum 7, 243–251 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463336

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463336

Search

Navigation