Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 28, 2022

The individual, kata and the arts: semiotic considerations on cultural identity

  • Ramunas Motiekaitis EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

This article is a semiotics-based attempt to explain artistic creativity of traditional East Asia and the Romantic West. Invoking the Greimas-Tarasti model, in which the modalities of “will,” “must,” “can,” and “know” are considered as a semiotic system, the author tries to examine how these modalities are manifested in discourses that define artistic subjectivities and actions. The concepts of the sublime and yūgen, authenticity and kokoro, formal communicational standards and kata, conventional beauty and hana are discussed side by side from a comparative perspective. However, the article tries to reveal cultural creative patterns not so much in terms of qualitative difference as in terms of a particular configuration of a universal system. In the subject–object conjunction-oriented metaphysics of Buddhism and Confucianism, the immanent subjectivity is treated as constituted through the body and social mediation. For this reason, as we will see from the analysis of theater performance principles, individual kokoro can hardly be distinguished from impersonal kata. In the Romantic paradigm, longing for an initial (or final) subject–object conjunction is expressed in the ideal of organic synthesis, and artistic creation is considered as the best manifestation of such synthesis. However, this conjunction functions in most cases as an immanent aesthetic vision, and symbols can hardly become the “complete representation of true spiritual life.”


Corresponding author: Ramunas Motiekaitis, Lithuanian Academy of Music and Theatre, Vilnius, Lithuania, E-mail:

References

Azade, Seyhan. 1992. Representation and its discontents: The critical legacy of German romanticism. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912083Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin, Michael Holquist (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image – music – text, Stephen Heath (trans.). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1982. Empire of signs, Richard Howard (trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C. 2003. The romantic imperative: The concept of early German romanticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1999. The roots of romanticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berque, Augustin. 1992. Identification of the self in relation to the environment. In Nancy R. Rosenberger (ed.), Japanese sense of self, 93–104. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bonds, Mark E. 1991. Wordless rhetoric: Musical form and metaphor of the oration. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674733411Search in Google Scholar

Bronwen, Martin & Felizitas Ringham. 2000. Dictionary of semiotics. London & New York: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Burnham, Scott. 1995. Beethoven hero. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691215884Search in Google Scholar

Chandler, Daniel. 2002. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203166277Search in Google Scholar

De Chirico, Giorgio. 1992. Mystery and creation. In Charles Harrison & Paul Wood (eds.), Art in theory 1990–1990: An anthology of changing ideas, 60–61. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1973. Speech and phenomena, David B. Allison (trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 2012. Inventing the enemy, Richard Dixon (trans.). London: Harvill Secker Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fujiwara, Shunzei. 2011. Calm contemplation in Heisig. In James Heisig, Thomas Kasulis & John Maraldo (eds.), Japanese philosophy: A source book, 1173–1174. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fuseli, Henri. 2000. Aphorisms on art. In Charles Harrison, Paul Wood & Jason Gaiger (eds.), Art in theory 1648–1815: An anthology of changing ideas, 948–952. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1983. Structural semantics: An attempt at a method, Daniele McDowell, Ronald Schleifer & Alan Velie (trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1987. On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory, Paul J. Perron & Frank H. Collins (trans.). London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1989 [1970]. Apie prasmę. In Semiotika: Darbų rinktinė, Rolandas Pavilionis (trans.), 75–220. Vilnius: Minties leidykla.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1989 [1983]. Apie prasmę II. In Semiotika: Darbų rinktinė, Rolandas Pavilionis (trans.), 223–380. Vilnius: Minties leidykla.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. & Joseph, Courtés. 1979. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary, Larry Crist (trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. & Joseph Courtés. 1982. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg F. 1975. The philosophy of fine art, vol. 2, Francis P. B. Osmaston (trans.). New York: Hacker Art.Search in Google Scholar

Heisig, James, Thomas Kasulis & John Maraldo (eds.). 2011. Japanese philosophy: A source book. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.10.21313/hawaii/9780824835521.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1971. Poetry, language, thought, Albert Hofstadter (trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1989. Contributions to philosophy (from Enowning), Parvis Emad & Kenneth Maly (trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hisamatsu, Shin‘ichi. 2011. The way of tea. In James, Heisig, Thomas Kasulis & John Maraldo (eds.), Japanese philosophy: A source book, 1194–1197. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kavolis, Vytautas. 1980. Romanticism and Taoism: The planes of cultural organization. Comparative Civilizations Review 5. 1–32.Search in Google Scholar

Kundera, Milan. 1991. Immortality. New York: Harper & Collins.Search in Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural anthropology, Claire Jacobson & Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (trans.). New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Yuri, Boris A. Uspensky & George Mihaychuk. 1978. On the semiotic mechanism of culture. Special issue, New Literary History 9(2). 211–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/468571.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Yuri, Vyacheslav V. Ivanov, Alexandr M. Pjatigorski, Vladimir N. Toporov & Boris Uspenskij. 2013. Theses on the semiotic study of cultures. In Silvi Salupere, Peeter Torop & Kalevi Kull (eds.), Beginning of the semiotics of culture, 53–77. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marc, Franz. 1992. Foreword to the planned second volume of Der Blaue Reiter. In Charles Harrison & Paul Wood (eds.), Art in theory 1990–1990: An anthology of changing ideas, 156–157. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Stephen D. 2013. The wind from vulture peak: The Buddhification of Japanese Waka in the Heian period. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University East Asian Series.10.1515/9781933947761Search in Google Scholar

Minamoto, Ryōen. 1989. Kata. Tokyo: Kurabunsha.Search in Google Scholar

Minamoto, Ryōen. 1994. In Minamoto Ryōen (ed.), Kata to Nihon Bunka. Tokyo: Kurabunsha.Search in Google Scholar

Minamoto, Ryōen. 2011. Kata as style. In Heisig James, Thomas Kasulis & John Maraldo (eds.), Japanese philosophy: A source book, 930–935. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miner, Earl, Hiroko Odagiri & Robert Morrell (eds.). 1985. The Princeton companion to classical Japanese literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691218380Search in Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1967. Will to power, Walter Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale (trans.). New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Nishida, Kitarō. 2012. Place and dialectic, John W. M. Krummel & Shigenori Nagatomo (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nishitani, Keiji. 1982. Religion and nothingness, Jan Van Bragt (trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Novalis, Friedrich. 1997. Philosophical writings, Margaret Mahony Stoljar (trans. & ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ogyū, Sorai. 2011. The way and the names. In James Heisig, Thomas Kasulis & John Maraldo (eds.), Japanese philosophy: A source book, 394–408. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Qiu, Peipei. 2005. Bashō and the Dao: The Zhuangzi and the transformation of Haikai. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sasaki, Ken’ichi. 2002. Poetics of intransivity. In Michael F. Marra (ed.), Japanese hermeneutics, 17–24. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9780824863104-005Search in Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich W. J. 1978 [1800]. System of transcendental idealism, Peter Heath (trans.). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. 2000. Critical fragments. In Charles Harrison, Paul Wood & Jason Gaiger (eds.), Art in theory 1648–1815: An anthology of changing ideas, 899–909. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Schulte-Sasse, Jochen. 1997. Theory as practice: A critical anthology of early German romantic writings. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert. 1988. Continental philosophy since 1750: The rise and fall of the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Sadami & Shigeki Iwai. 2006. Wabi, Sabi, Yugen: Nihonteki naru Mono e no Dōtei [Wabi, Sabi, Yūgen: The process to be seen as an approach to the essence of beauty in Japan]. Tokyo: Suiseisha.Search in Google Scholar

Swanson, Paul L. 2011. Introduction. In Brain, science, and Kokoro: Asian perspectives on science and religion, vii–xiv. Nagoya: Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture.Search in Google Scholar

Tarasti, Eero. 2000. Existential semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctt20060dhSearch in Google Scholar

Tarasti, Eero. 2012. Semiotics of classical music: How Mozart, Brahms, and Wagner talk to us. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614511410Search in Google Scholar

Taruskin, Richard. 2005. Music in the nineteenth century [Oxford history of western music 4]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tatarkewicz, Władysław. 1980. A history of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics. New York: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity, Michael Holquist (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yuasa, Yasuo. 1987. The body: Towards an Eastern mind-body theory, Nagatomo Shigenori & Thomas P. Kasulis (trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zeami. 2008. Performance notes, Tom Hare (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-30
Accepted: 2022-05-02
Published Online: 2022-11-28
Published in Print: 2022-11-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2021-0104/html
Scroll to top button