Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter September 28, 2013

Evolutionary-ontological reflection on physical activity of man in culture

  • Vratislav Moudr
From the journal Human Affairs

Abstract

This article is written from the perspective of Josef Šmajs’ evolutionary ontology and considers physical activity in humans. It focuses in detail on a particular form—physical exercise. In the author’s opinion, current physical exercise (sport activity) and any other human form of activity is part of the internal autopoietic processes of the sociocultural system, which displays an ever-increasingly destructive tendency towards its natural environment—towards the host system of the biosphere. The author attempts to establish the degree and manner to which the anti-nature activity of physical exercise varies, but also seeks to point out how they contribute to a potential biophilic transformation of culture.

[1] Buchtová, B. (2009). K potřebě obratu ve vzdělávání studentů ekonomických oborů. In M. Timko (Ed.). K problému ontologie kultury, pp. 80–84. Brno: Tribun EU. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Hodaň, B. (2009). K problému filosofické kinantropologie. Olomouc: Palacký University. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Hodaň, B. (2006). Sociokulturní kinantropologie I. Brno: Masaryk University. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lovelock, J. (1994). Gaia: živoucí planeta. Praha: Mladá fronta. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Luhmann, N. (1987). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Maturana, H. (2002). Autopoiesis, Structural Coupling and Cognition. Retrieved 23. 6. 2013 from 〈http://isss.org/maturana.htm〉. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Maturana, H., Varela, F. (1987). The Tree of Knowledge. Boston: Shambala Press. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Poljakov, N. (2012). Britská olympijská loterie: Hra o devět miliard liber. Hospodářské noviny. Praha: Economia 145, 1–5. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Shepard, P. (1995). Nature and Madness. In T. Roszak, M. E. Gomes, A.E. Kanner (Eds.). Ecopsychology, pp. 21–40. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Strejčková, E. (2005). Anotace výledků projektu „Výzkum odcizování člověka přírodě“. Praha: Ministerstvo životního prostředí. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Šmajs, J. (2010). Ekonomika a příroda — filosofická reflexe problému. Ekonomický časopis, 58/2, 126–143. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Šmajs, J. (2008a). Filosofie — obrat k Zemi. Praha: Academia. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Šmajs, J. (2008b). Evolutionary Ontology. Reclaiming the Value of Nature by Transforming Culture. New York and Amsterdam: Rodopi. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Šmajs, J. (2012a). Ekonomika a příroda. Britské listy. Retrieved 5. 7. 2013 from 〈http://www.blisty.cz/art/65667.html〉. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Šmajs, J. (2012b). Evoluční ontologie kultury a problém podnikání. [Evolutionary Ontology of Culture and the Issues of Business]. Brno: Doplněk, Masarykova univerzita. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Šmajs, J. (2012c). Jsme připraveni důstojně ustupovat. Britské listy. Retrieved 5. 7. 2013 from 〈http://www.blisty.cz/art/63663.html〉. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Šmajs, J. (11997). Ohrožená kultura. [Threatened Culture]. Praha: Hynek. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-09-28
Published in Print: 2013-10-01

© 2013 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 30.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s13374-013-0148-y/html
Scroll to top button