Abstract
In this article I examine a recent development in online communication, the immersive virtual worlds of Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs). I argue that these environments provide a distinct form of online experience from the experience available through earlier generation forms of online communication such as newsgroups, chat rooms, email and instant messaging. The experience available to participants in MMORPGs is founded on shared activity, while the experience of earlier generation online communication is largely if not wholly dependent on the communication itself. This difference, I argue, makes interaction in immersive virtual worlds such as MMORPGs relevantly similar to interaction in the physical world, and distinguishes both physical world and immersive virtual world interaction from other forms of online communication. I argue that to the extent that shared activity is a core element in the formation of friendships, friendships can form in immersive virtual worlds as they do in the physical world, and that this possibility was unavailable in earlier forms of online interaction. I do, however, note that earlier forms of online interaction are capable of sustaining friendships formed through either physical or immersive virtual world interaction. I conclude that we cannot any longer make a sharp distinction between the physical and the virtual world, as the characteristics of friendship are able to be developed in each.
- Aristotle. (1998). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Blizzard Entertainment: Press Releases. (2010). http://us.blizzard.com/ en-us/company/press/pressreleases.html?101007. Last Accessed December 6, 2010).Google Scholar
- Bratman, M. E. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 327-341.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Briggle, A. (2008). Real friends. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 71-79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(1), 54-59.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cocking, D., & Kennett, J. (1998). Friendship and the self. Ethics, 108, 502-527.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cocking, D., & Mathews, S. (2000). Unreal friends. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 223-231. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cole, H., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Social Interactions in massively multiplayer online roleplaying games. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(4), 575-583.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cooper, J. (1977a). Aristotle on the forms of friendship. The Review of Metaphysics, 30(4), 619-648.Google Scholar
- Cooper, J. (1977b). Friendship and the good in aristotle. The Philosophical Review, 86(3), 290-315.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Facebook.com. (2010). Statistics. http://www.facebook.com/press/ info.php?statistics. Last Accessed December 6, 2010).Google Scholar
- Gilbert, M. (2000). Sociality and responsibility: New essays in plural subject theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Helm, B. W. (2008). Plural agents. Nous, 42(1), 17-49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helm, B. W. (2009). Friendship. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2009 Edition), http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/friendship/.Google Scholar
- Helm, B. W. (2010). Love, friendship and the self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Leib, E. J. (2007). Friendship & the law. UCLA Law Review, 54, 631-707.Google Scholar
- Mason, A. (1997). Special obligations to compatriots. Ethics, 107(3), 427-447.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9-31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nardi, B., Harris, J. (2006). Strangers and friends: Collaborative play in world of warcraft. In Proceedings of CSCW '06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 149-158. Google Scholar
- Rorty, A. (1993). The historicity of psychological attitudes: Love is not love which alters not when it alteration finds. In N. K. Badhwar (Ed.), Friendship: A philosophical reader (pp. 73-88). New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Rosen, C. (2007). Virtual friendship and the new narcissism. The New Atlantis, 17, 15-31.Google Scholar
- Rouse, R. (2000). Game design: Theory & practice. Plano, Texas: Wordware Publishing, Inc. Google Scholar
- Scheffler, S. (1997). Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(3), 189-209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sherman, N. (1987). Aristotle on friendship and the shared life. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 47(4), 589-613.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sony Champions of Norrath Press Release. (2004). http:// championsofnorrath.station.sony.com/headset.jsp. Last accessed December 6, 2010).Google Scholar
- Telfer, E. (1971). Friendship. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 71, 223-241.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas, L. (1987). Friendship. Synthese, 72, 217-236.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tuomela, R. (1993). What is cooperation? Erkentniss, 38, 87-101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Velleman, J. D. (1997). How to share an intention. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 57(1), 29-50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Verhagen, H., Johansson, M. (2009). Demystifying guilds: MMORPG-playing and norms. Breaking new ground: Innovations in games, play, practice and theory. http://digra.org:8080/Plone/dl/db/ 09291.50401.pdf. Last Accessed December 8, 2010).Google Scholar
- White, R. J. (2001). Love's philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Terra Nova. (2011). http://terranova.blogs.com/.Google Scholar
- Yee, N. http://www.nickyee.com/index-daedalus.html.Google Scholar
- Yee, N. (2006a). Motivations of play in online games. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9, 772-775.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yee, N. (2006b). The labor of fun: How video games blur the boundaries of work and play. Games and Culture, 1, 68-71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yee, N. (2006c). The demographics, motivations and derived experiences of users of massively-multiuser online graphical environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 309-329. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Software Techniques to Reduce Cybersickness Among Users of Immersive Virtual Reality Environments
Intelligent Information and Database SystemsAbstractThe virtual worlds are photorealistic, the users have difficulty distinguishing the reality and virtuality. The high degree of realism of artificial virtual worlds results in deep immersion in virtual environments. The users immerse themselves in ...
My Body, My Avatar: How People Perceive Their Avatars in Social Virtual Reality
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe perception and experience of avatars has been critical to understand the social dynamics in virtual environments, online gaming, and collaborative systems. How would emerging sociotechnical systems further complicate the role of avatars in our online ...
Virtual worlds and moral evaluation
Consider the multi-user virtual worlds of online games such as EVE and World of Warcraft, or the multi-user virtual world of Second Life. Suppose a player performs an action in one of these worlds, via his or her virtual character, which would be wrong, ...
Comments