skip to main content
article

The reality of friendship within immersive virtual worlds

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this article I examine a recent development in online communication, the immersive virtual worlds of Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs). I argue that these environments provide a distinct form of online experience from the experience available through earlier generation forms of online communication such as newsgroups, chat rooms, email and instant messaging. The experience available to participants in MMORPGs is founded on shared activity, while the experience of earlier generation online communication is largely if not wholly dependent on the communication itself. This difference, I argue, makes interaction in immersive virtual worlds such as MMORPGs relevantly similar to interaction in the physical world, and distinguishes both physical world and immersive virtual world interaction from other forms of online communication. I argue that to the extent that shared activity is a core element in the formation of friendships, friendships can form in immersive virtual worlds as they do in the physical world, and that this possibility was unavailable in earlier forms of online interaction. I do, however, note that earlier forms of online interaction are capable of sustaining friendships formed through either physical or immersive virtual world interaction. I conclude that we cannot any longer make a sharp distinction between the physical and the virtual world, as the characteristics of friendship are able to be developed in each.

References

  1. Aristotle. (1998). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blizzard Entertainment: Press Releases. (2010). http://us.blizzard.com/ en-us/company/press/pressreleases.html?101007. Last Accessed December 6, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bratman, M. E. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 327-341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Briggle, A. (2008). Real friends. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 71-79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(1), 54-59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cocking, D., & Kennett, J. (1998). Friendship and the self. Ethics, 108, 502-527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cocking, D., & Mathews, S. (2000). Unreal friends. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 223-231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cole, H., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Social Interactions in massively multiplayer online roleplaying games. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(4), 575-583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cooper, J. (1977a). Aristotle on the forms of friendship. The Review of Metaphysics, 30(4), 619-648.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, J. (1977b). Friendship and the good in aristotle. The Philosophical Review, 86(3), 290-315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Facebook.com. (2010). Statistics. http://www.facebook.com/press/ info.php?statistics. Last Accessed December 6, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilbert, M. (2000). Sociality and responsibility: New essays in plural subject theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Helm, B. W. (2008). Plural agents. Nous, 42(1), 17-49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Helm, B. W. (2009). Friendship. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2009 Edition), http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/friendship/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Helm, B. W. (2010). Love, friendship and the self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Leib, E. J. (2007). Friendship & the law. UCLA Law Review, 54, 631-707.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mason, A. (1997). Special obligations to compatriots. Ethics, 107(3), 427-447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9-31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Nardi, B., Harris, J. (2006). Strangers and friends: Collaborative play in world of warcraft. In Proceedings of CSCW '06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 149-158. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rorty, A. (1993). The historicity of psychological attitudes: Love is not love which alters not when it alteration finds. In N. K. Badhwar (Ed.), Friendship: A philosophical reader (pp. 73-88). New York: Cornell University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosen, C. (2007). Virtual friendship and the new narcissism. The New Atlantis, 17, 15-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rouse, R. (2000). Game design: Theory & practice. Plano, Texas: Wordware Publishing, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheffler, S. (1997). Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(3), 189-209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sherman, N. (1987). Aristotle on friendship and the shared life. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 47(4), 589-613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sony Champions of Norrath Press Release. (2004). http:// championsofnorrath.station.sony.com/headset.jsp. Last accessed December 6, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Telfer, E. (1971). Friendship. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 71, 223-241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Thomas, L. (1987). Friendship. Synthese, 72, 217-236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Tuomela, R. (1993). What is cooperation? Erkentniss, 38, 87-101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Velleman, J. D. (1997). How to share an intention. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 57(1), 29-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Verhagen, H., Johansson, M. (2009). Demystifying guilds: MMORPG-playing and norms. Breaking new ground: Innovations in games, play, practice and theory. http://digra.org:8080/Plone/dl/db/ 09291.50401.pdf. Last Accessed December 8, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. White, R. J. (2001). Love's philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Terra Nova. (2011). http://terranova.blogs.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yee, N. http://www.nickyee.com/index-daedalus.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yee, N. (2006a). Motivations of play in online games. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9, 772-775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Yee, N. (2006b). The labor of fun: How video games blur the boundaries of work and play. Games and Culture, 1, 68-71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Yee, N. (2006c). The demographics, motivations and derived experiences of users of massively-multiuser online graphical environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 309-329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access