Abstract
In this paper, I explain in which way the temporal location of individuals is determined by the temporal interpretation of a clause. The most drastic effects show up in past tense individual-level clauses (section 1). I argue in section 2 that predicates provide lexically determined minimal requirements on their arguments' lifetimes. The role of tense for lifetime effects is an indirect one: by virtue of its determining the temporal interpretation of the main predicate of a clause, it triggers implicatures which cause lifetime effects. This proposal is refined in section 3 so as to be able to explain the blocking of lifetime effects in certain contexts. This blocking is due to the choice of topics and the choice of values for temporal restrictions. In section 4 I compare my proposal to a proposal of Kratzer (1989b) and argue that my account is more adequate. Kratzer's main claim, that the temporal location of individuals is sometimes directly determined by tense, runs into several problems which are avoided in my account.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, John: 1973, ‘The Ghost of Times Past’, Foundations of Language 9, 481–491.
Bäuerle, Rainer: 1977, Tempus, Temporaladverb und die temporale Frage, Papiere des SFB 99 nos. 13 and 15, University of Konstanz.
Bäuerle, Rainer: 1979, Temporale Deixis, temporale Frage, Narr, Tübingen.
Binnick, Robert I.: 1991, Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect, Oxford University Press, New York.
Curme, G. O.: 1931, Syntax, D.C. Heath, Boston.
Declerck, Renaat: 1991, Tense in English, Routledge, London.
Diesing, Molly: 1988, ‘Bare Plural Subjects and the Stage/Individual Contrast’, in M. Krifka (ed.), Genericity in Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1988 Tübingen Conference, pp. 107–154.
Diesing, Molly: 1992, Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Enç, Mürvet: 1981, Tense without Scope: An Analysis of Nouns as Indexicals, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin - Madison.
von Fintel, Kai: 1994, Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–58.
Jespersen, Otto: 1931, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, part 4: Syntax (vol. 3), Allen & Unwin, London.
Klein, Wolfgang: 1994, Time in Language, Routledge, London.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1978, Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie - Modalwörter - Konditionalsätze, Scriptor, Königstein/Taunus.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1989a, ‘An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1989b, ‘Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates’, in E. Bach, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Papers on Quantification, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Also published in G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995, pp. 125- 175.]
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia and Godehard Link: 1995, ‘Genericity: An Introduction’, in C. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–124.
Levinson, Stephen C.: 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Musan, Renate: 1995, On the Temporal Interpretation of Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Partee, Barbara H.: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English’, Journal of Philosophy 70, 601–609.
Perlmutter, David M. and Paul M. Postal: 1984, ‘The 1-Advancement Exclusiveness Law’, in D. Perlmutter and C. G. Rosen (eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 81–125.
von Stechow, Arnim: 1992, Intensionale Semantik - eingeführt anhand der Temporalität, Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Arbeitspapier Nr. 40, Universität Konstanz.
Tichy, Pavel: 1985, ‘Do We Need Interval Semantics?’, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 263–282.
Vlach, Frank: 1993, ‘Temporal Adverbials, Tenses, and the Perfect’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 231–283.
Westerstå hl, Dag: 1984, ‘Determiners and Context Sets’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 45–71.
Williams, Edwin: 1981, ‘Argument Structure and Morphology’, The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Musan, R. Tense, Predicates, and Lifetime Effects. Natural Language Semantics 5, 271–301 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008281017969
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008281017969