Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer software patents: Some perspectives and misunderstandings

  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

The importance that in-house software plays today in many organizations is without question. Perspectives of efficiencies, effectiveness, competitive advantage, and so on are but three areas where such applications exist. Many organizations have adopted measures to protect such software as a specific type of intellectual property. In the 1990s quite often the form of protection taken is software patents. The understanding and enthusiasm about software patents that is exhibited by organizations is not often shared by information systems researchers, however. For the most part, IS researchers dismiss software patents as an appropriate protective measure. This paper presents some background on patents and their applicability to software. Some US and international perspectives are also discussed to provide the reader with a somewhat broader perspective. We then discuss several IS research endeavors that either dismiss patents, or treat them incorrectly. We conclude with a research agenda for IS researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, R. (1995). Intellectual property diligence. Upside, 7(7), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Advisory Commission on Patent Law Reform (A Report to the Secretary of Commerce). (1992). 145–96 (gopher://wiretap.spies.com:70/00/Gov/Patent/patent.ov).

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (50), 179–211.

  • Bender, D. and Barkume, A.R. (1992). Patents for software-related inventions. Software Law Journal, (5), 279–98.

  • Brancheau, J.C., Janz, B.D., and Wetherbe, J.C. (1996). Key issues in information systems management: SIM delphi results. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 225–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, J.I., Jr., McFarlan, F.W., McKenney, J.L., and Applegate, L.M. (1992). Corporate information systems management. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E.K. (1986). Information systems for sustainable competitive advantage. Information & Management, 11(3), 131–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E.K. and Row, M.C. (1991). Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 275–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. (1994). Software patents back on the agenda. Managing Intellectual Property, 7(42), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981).

  • Feeny, D.F. and Ives, B. (1990). In search of sustainability: Reaping long-term advantages from investments in information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(1), 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flewellen, L.N. (1981). An anomaly in the patent system: The uncertain status of computer software. Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 8(2), 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholz, C.L. (1984). Willful infringement and “magic words”—the effect of opinions of counsel an awards of increased damages and attorney fees. Journal of the Patent Office Society, 66(11), 598–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, K. and Ravishankar, M.K. (1996). Intellectual property rights in computer software: Issues at stake for developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 7(4), 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastriner, L.G. (1991). The revival of confidence in the patent system. Journal of Patent and Trademark Office Society, 74(1), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelkar, V.L., Chaturvedi, D.N., and Dar, M.K. (1991). India’ information economy: Role, size, and scope. Economic and Political Weekly, 26(37), 2153–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M.B. and Montgomery, D.B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, (9), 41–58.

  • Mansfield, E. (1985). How rapidly does new industrial technology leak out? Journal of Industrial Economics, (34), 217–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., and Wagner, L. (1981). Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study. Economic Journal, (91), 907–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, F.J., Fuerst, W.L., and Barney, J.B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall v. Astec Industries, Inc., U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1134, 1140 (E.D. Tenn 1988).

  • Merrill Lynch wins cash account row with Dean Witter. (1983). Wall Street Journal, December 28, 1983, 2,3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz, J.F. and Pace, N.M. (1994). Trends in patent litigation: The apparent influence of strengthened patents attributable to the court of appeals for the federal circuit. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 76(8), 579–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.R. and Davis, M.H. (1990). Intellectual property. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrs, Fields, Inc., Park City, UT (Assignee). (1992). System and method for making staff schedules as a function of available resources as well as employee skill level, availability and priority. United States Patent #5,111,391, May 5.

  • Norton, R.D., (1996). Personal communication with R. Norton, November 1996, The SABRE Group, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, TX.

  • Paine, Webber v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, 564 F.Supp. 1358 (1983).

  • Plains Cotton Cooperative Association, Lubbock, TX, (Assignee). (1991). Goods database employing electronic title or documentary-type title. United States Patent #5,063,507, November 5.

  • Roy, U., Tuch, R.D., and Clark, J.E. (1997). Global Assessment of Patents, R&D Investment and Economic Output: Part 1—Macro Comparisons at the Country Level. Journal of Patent and Trademark Office Society, 79(3), 110–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S. (1995). Patent Medicine. Technology Review, 98(8), 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siller, G. and Retsky, J.E. (1993). Patent and trade secret protection of computer technology. Software Law Journal, VI, 239–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann, P.A. (1997). Will big spending on computers guarantee profitability? Datamation, 43(2), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Survey of united states software patents issued from July 1987 through December 1987. (1988). Proprietary Rights Committee, Computer Law Section, State Bar of Michigan.

  • Szepesi, J.A. (1996). Maximizing protection for computer software. Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, 12(1), 173–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L.C. (1997). Needed: A new system of intellectual property rights. Harvard Business Review, 95–103.

  • United Healthcare Corporation, Minneapolis, MN (Assignee). (1994). Health care payment adjudication and review system. United States Patent #5,359,509, October 25, 1994.

  • Vitale, M.R. (1986). the growing risks of information systems success. MIS Quarterly, 10(4), 327–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Information Systems & Quantitative Analysis, University of Arkansas, 72701, Fayetteville, AR

    Kathleen Mykytyn Ph.D. (student)

  2. the Department of Information Systems and Management Sciences, University of Texas at Arlington, USA

    Peter P. Mykytyn (Professor)

  3. the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

    Vicki McKinney (Assistant Professor)

Authors
  1. Kathleen Mykytyn Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter P. Mykytyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vicki McKinney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Mykytyn Ph.D..

Additional information

the Department of Computer Information Systems & Quantitative Analysis, University of Arkansas. She has conducted extensive research in the area of the law and information technology. Her published research has appeared in MIS Quarterly, Journal of Management Information Systems, and Knowledge and Policy.

His research interests include examination of the strategic aspects of information systems and the relationship between the law and information technology. His research has been published in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly, and the Journal of Management Information Systems.

Her current research is focused on interogranizational systems and the human relationships that exist in parallel to these systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mykytyn, K., Mykytyn, P.P. & McKinney, V. Computer software patents: Some perspectives and misunderstandings. Know Techn Pol 11, 91–106 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-998-1012-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-998-1012-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation