Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Converse Abduction in Kepler

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explains how Kepler in his ``War onMars'' applied systems of models organized bothin a perspectival and in a stratifiedconceptual sense. With the help of thesesystems Kepler worked out successively moredeterminate models for the planetary orbits.Along the way he discovered the Keplerian lawsas consequences of the distance rule, hisleading regulative principle. The selection ofdecisive, so called privileged, observations,as well as the determinate geometrical andkinematical description of the phenomena,result from the application of this principleto the developing of models. Kepler's method ofdiscovery may therefore appropriately bedesignated converse abduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aiton, E.J.: 1969, Kepler's Second Law of Planetary Motion, ISIS60: 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, W.: 2000, Michael Friedman on Kant and Newton, Dialogue39(2): 279–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, S.A.: 1983, A New Look at Kepler and Abductive Argument, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 14(4): 279–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1962, A Function for Thought Experiments. In I. Hacking (ed.), Scientific Revolutions. Oxford University Press (1981), 6–27.

  • Myrstad, J.A.: 1998, Models in Perception and Models in Science, Philosophica62: 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrstad, J.A.: 2003, The Indexicality of Perception and Perceptual Objects. In H. Fossheim, T.M. Larsen and J.R. Sageng (eds.), Non-Conceptual Aspects of Experience. Oslo: Unipubforlag, 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J.: 1999, Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisis, V.: 1999, Expansion and Justification of Models: The Exemplary Case of Galileo Galilei. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel Hanson, N.: 1965, Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge University Press.

  • Suárez, M.: 1999, Theories, Models, and Representations. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tønnessen, S.: 2002, Upon the Shoulders of Giants. Thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Tromsø: Unpublished.

  • Wilson, C.: 1968, Kepler's Derivation of the Elliptical Path, ISIS59: 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C.: 1972, How did Kepler discover his First Two Laws, Scientific American226(3): 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C.: 1974, Newton and Some Philosophers on Kepler's "Laws", Journal of the History of Ideas35(1974): 231–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myrstad, J.A. The Use of Converse Abduction in Kepler. Foundations of Science 9, 321–338 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042846.93506.b8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042846.93506.b8

Navigation