Abstract
Informed consent honors the autonomous decisions of patients, and family consent places importance on decisions made by their families. However, there is little understanding of the relationship between these two medical decision-making approaches. Both approaches exist in Japan as part of its truth disclosure policy. What is the status of family consent in the United States, from which Japan introduced informed consent? This paper compares the situation in the United States with that in Japan, where family consent has been combined with informed consent. It then explains the history of policy development through which family consent was added to informed consent in the United States. Based on this analysis, the paper suggests that the relationship between informed consent and family consent in the United States was established on the basis of a family model that places more importance on trust-based relationships than it does on blood ties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akabayashi, A., and B.T. Slingsby. 2006. Informed consent revisited: Japan and the U.S. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1): 9–14.
Akabayashi, A., M.D. Fetters, and T.S. Elwyn. 1999. Family consent, communication, and advance directive for cancer disclosure: A Japanese case and discussion. Journal of Medical Ethics 25: 296–301.
Asch, D.A., J. Hansen-Flaschen, and P.N. Lanken. 1995. Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: Conflicts between physicians’ practices and patients’ wishes. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 151: 288–292.
Bai, K., and R. Muir. 1975. Around the Karen Quinlan case: Interview with Judge R. Muir. The International Journal of Medicine and Law 1: 45–67.
Beauchamp, T.L. 1997. Comparative studies: Japan and America. In Japanese and Western bioethics: Studies in moral diversity, ed. K. Hoshino, 25–47. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Berg, J.W., P.S. Appelbaum, C.W. Lidz, and L.S. Parker. 2001. Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Buchanan, A.E., and D.W. Brock. 1990. Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Charles, C., A. Gafni, and T. Whelan. 1997. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? Social Science and Medicine 44: 681–692.
Charles, C., A. Gafni, and T. Whelan. 1999. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine 49: 651–661.
Cong, Y. 2004. Doctor–family–patient relationship: The Chinese paradigm of informed consent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29: 149–178.
Emanuel, E.J., and L.L. Emanuel. 1992. Four models of the physician–patient relationship. JAMA 267: 2221–2226.
Evans, J.H. 2011. The history and future of bioethics: A sociological view. New York: Oxford University Press.
Faden, R.R., T.L. Beauchamp, and N.M.P. King. 1986. A theory and history of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fan, R. 1997. Self-determination vs. family-determination: Two incommensurable principles of autonomy. Bioethics 11: 309–322.
Fan, R., and J. Tao. 2004. Consent to medical treatment: The complex interplay of patients, families, and physicians. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29: 139–148.
Fetters, M.D. 1998. The family in medical decision making: Japanese perspectives. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 9: 132–146.
Fox, R.C. 1989. The sociology of medicine: A participant observer’s view. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Fox, R.C., and J.P. Swazey. 2008. Observing bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gutheil, T.G., and P.S. Appelbaum. 1983. Substituted Judgment: Best interests in disguise. The Hastings Center Report 13 (3): 8–11.
Harmon, L. 1990. Falling off the vine: Legal fictions and the doctrine of substituted judgment. The Yale Law Journal 100: 1–71.
Higuchi, N. 1992. The patient’s right to know of a cancer diagnosis: A comparison of Japanese paternalism and American self-determination. Washburn Law Journal 31: 455–473.
Hirschman, K.B., J.M. Kapo, and J.H.T. Karlawish. 2006. Why doesn’t a family member of a person with advanced dementia use a substituted judgment when making a decision for that person? The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 14: 659–667.
Jonsen, A.R. 1998. The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kato, I. 1984. Bioethics and law: Concerning health care and medical science. Economia 80: 1–23. (in Japanese).
Kuczewski, M. 2004. From informed consent to substituted judgment: Decision-making at the end-of-life. HEC Forum 16: 27–37.
Lock, M. 2001. Twice dead: Organ transplantation and the reinvention of death. Oakland: University of California Press.
Makoul, G., and M.L. Clayman. 2006. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Education and Counselling 60: 301–312.
Ministry of Health and Welfare (Japan). 1985. Considering bioethics: Meeting report on bioethics. Tokyo: Igaku Shoin. (in Japanese).
Ministry of Health and Welfare (Japan) & Japan Medical Association. 1989. Terminal care: Report and examination. Tokyo: Chuohoki Publishing. (in Japanese).
Nagai, H. 2016. Autonomy from the family: A history of public policy on medical decision-making in Japan. Asian Bioethics Review 8 (2): 94–108.
Ohara, K. 1982. Attitude survey on cancer and death: Comparative examination of doctors, nurses and the general public. Japan Medical Journal 3050: 43–50. (in Japanese).
O’Neill, O. 2002. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parks, S.M., L. Winter, A.J. Santana, B. Parker, J.J. Diamond, M. Rose, and R.E. Myers. 2011. Family factors in end of life decision making: Family conflict and proxy relationship. Journal of Palliative Medicine 14: 179–184.
Pellegrino, E.D. 1992. Intersections of Western biomedical ethics and world culture: Problematic and possibility. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1: 191–196.
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (U.S.). 1982. Making health care decisions: Report on the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (U.S.). 1983. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: A report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Rothman, D.J. 1991. Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York: Basic Books.
Supreme Court of New Jersey. 1976. In the matter of Karen Quinlan: The complete briefs, oral arguments, and opinion in the New Jersey Supreme Court. Arlington: University Publications of America.
Torke, A.M., G.C. Alexander, and J. Lantos. 2008. Substituted judgment: The limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23: 1514–1517.
Veatch, R.M. 1982. An ethical framework for terminal care decisions: A new classification of patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 32: 665–669.
Veatch, R.M. 1993. Forgoing life-sustaining treatment: Limits to the consensus. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3: 1–19.
Veatch, R.M. 2000. Doctor does not know best: Why in the new century physicians must stop trying to benefit patients. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25: 701–721.
Veatch, R.M. 2009. The evolution of death and dying controversies. Hastings Center Report 139 (9): 16–19.
Vig, E.K., J.S. Taylor, H. Starks, E.K. Hopley, and K. Fryer-Edwards. 2006. Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 54: 1688–1693.
Whitney, S.N., A.L. McGuire, and L.B. McCullough. 2003. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Annals of Internal Medicine 140: 54–59.
Winter, L., and S.M. Parks. 2008. Family discord and proxy decision makers’ end-of-life treatment decisions. Journal of Palliative Medicine 11: 1109–1114.
Acknowledgments
This study was made possible in part by grant-in-aid for scientific research (KAKENHI) No. 23613001, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nagai, H. Blood ties and trust: a comparative history of policy on family consent in Japan and the United States. Monash Bioeth. Rev. 34, 226–238 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-017-0069-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-017-0069-3