Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolving Conceptions of Human Rights as a Bourdieusian Distinction Strategy: A Critical Perspective on Policies Targeting Muslim Populations

  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines post-9/11 efforts by Western governments to instill respect for human rights among the world’s Muslim populations. The article argues that Western discourses on human rights are best conceptualized as a hegemonic Bourdieusian distinction strategy. In a dynamic strategy of this type, new human rights norms are continually produced and subverted by liberal elites in the West. Because these norms are constantly evolving, Muslim social practices can never “catch up” to them. This produces a perpetual distinction between a progressive liberal Occident and a backwards illiberal Orient, justifying the perpetual hegemony of the former over the latter. In developing its analysis, the article gives special attention to right-wing nationalist movements in Europe and the USA and US foreign policy in the Middle East. These developments are situated in relationship to liberal imperialism in the Colonial era, the Global War on Terrorism, and recent concerns over immigration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Bergen et al. 2019

  2. Le Figaro (Online) 2019

  3. For example, the Netherlands, Sweden, Iceland, and Norway

  4. Poland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland

  5. Although I do not wish to provide a link to such material, it can easily be located through an internet web search.

  6. See below for examples.

  7. For a discussion of Bourdieu’s legal contributions, see Garcia-Villegas 2004; Dezalay and Madsen 2012.

  8. British, French, Dutch, and Russian empires

  9. Given linguistic and cultural barriers, Oriental non-elites must have Occidental cultural production “translated” for them through Oriental elites.

  10. For example, Sayyid Ahmad Khan, Muhammad ‘Abduh, and Sayyid Shaykh al-Hadi

  11. For example, Sayyid Ahmad Khan, Muhammad ‘Abduh, and Sayyid Shaykh al-Hadi

  12. Although I address human rights indicators, there are other types of indicators as well (e.g., economic, health-related).

References

  • Abu-Lughod L (1990) The Romance of Resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist 17(1):41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Lughod L (2009) Dialectics of Women’s Empowerment: The International Circuitry of the Arab Human Development Report 2005. International Journal of Middle East Studies 41:83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Lughod L (2013) Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben G (1998) Homo Sacer. Daniel Heller-Roazen, Trans. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrama H (2012) Questioning Secularism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen L (2013) The Rise and Fall of Human Rights. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mahadin S (2015) Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Making (Non) sense of FEMEN's Ethico-Aesthetics in the Arab World. Women's Studies in Communication 38(4):388–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • An-Na’im A (1996) Toward an Islamic Reformation. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad T (1993) A Comment on Aijaz Ahmad’s In Theory. Public Culture 6:31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad T (2003) Formations of the Secular. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad T, Brown W, Butler J, Mahmood S (eds) (2009) Is Critique Secular. Townsend Papers in the Humanities. UC Berkeley, Townsend Center for the Humanities, Berkeley.

  • Awan I (ed) (2016) Islamophobia in Cyberspace. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett M (2011) Empire of Humanity. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (Online) (2018) “Migration to Europe in Charts.” 11 September 2018. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44660699. Accessed 23 December 2019.

  • Bergen P, Sterman D, Salyk-Virk M (2019) Terrorism in America 18 Years After 9/11. New America. https://www.newamerica.org/international-security/reports/terrorism-america-18-years-after-911/. Accessed 23 December 2019.

  • Bob C (2014) The Global Battle over Religious Expression: Sweden’s Ake Green Case in Local and Transnational Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40(2):212–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction. Richard Nice, Trans. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • Bourdieu P (1987) The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Richard Terdiman, Trans. Hastings Law Journal 38:805–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1990) The Logic of Practice. Richard Nice, Trans. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen J (2007) Why the French don’t like Headscarves. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen J (2016) On British Islam. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown W (2004) “The Most we can Hope for…”: Human Rights and the Politics of Fatalism. South Atlantic Quarterly 103 (2/3):451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker R (2017) Between nationalism and civilizationism: the European populist moment in comparative perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40(8):1191–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (2008) Sexual Politics, Torture, and Secular Time. The British Journal of Sociology 59(1):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Race & Gender (2016) Confronting fear: Islamophobia and its impact in the United States. Center for Race and Gender, UC Berkeley and The Council for American Islamic Relations.

  • Chabal E (2016) From the Banlieue to the Burkini: the many lives of French republicanism. Modern & Contemporary France 25(1):68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costs of War Project at Watson Institute (2019) Summary of Findings. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/papers/summary. Accessed 12 December 2019.

  • Dabashi H (2011) Brown Skin, White Masks. Pluto Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalacoura K (2007) Islam, Liberalism, and Human Rights. 3rd edn. I.B. Tauris, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale D, Westwood S (2019) Fact check: Trump falsely accuses Ilhan Omar of praising al Qaeda. CNN. 15 July 15 2009. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/15/politics/trump-falsely-accuses-omar-al-qaeda-fact-check/index.html. Accessed 30 July 2019.

  • Dezalay Y, Madsen M (2012) The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the Reflexive Sociology of Law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8:433–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd S (2015) The Structure of Islam in Switzerland and the effects of the Swiss minaret ban. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 35(1):43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly J (2003) Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

  • Engy A (2017) A Comparative Analysis of European Islamophobia: France, UK, Germany, Netherlands and Sweden. UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law 16:29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing K (2008) Stolen Honor. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon F (2008[1967]) Black Skin, White Masks. Charles Markmann, Trans. Pluto Press, New York.

  • Fassin D, Pandolfi M (eds) (2010) Contemporary States of Emergency. Zone Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Villegas M (2004) On Pierre Bourdieu’s Legal Thought. Droit et Société 1(56–57):57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordts E (2013) International Topless Jihad Day: FEMEN Activists Stage Protests Across Europe. Huffington Post. 5 April 2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/04/international-topless-jihad-day_n_3014943.html. Accessed 15 April 2014.

  • Gorman B, Seguin C (2018) World Citizens on the Periphery: Threat and Identification with Global Society. American Journal of Sociology 124(3):705–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabham E, Cooper D, Krishnadas J, Herman D (eds) (2009) Intersectionality and Beyond. Routledge-Cavendish, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett C (2017) 5 facts about the Muslim population in Europe. Pew Research Center. 29 November 2017. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/11/29/5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe/. Accessed 23 December 2019.

  • Hale R (1923) Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State. Political Science Quarterly 38(3):470–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock A (2016) Intersectionality. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt M, Negri A (2000) Empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy K (2017) Fuck Nuance. Sociological Theory 35(2):118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschkind C (2006) The Ethical Soundscape. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffington Post (2014) Ritual Circumcision Ban Recommended in Sweden and Denmark by Medical Associations. Huffington Post. 27 January 2014. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/27/circumcision-ban-sweden-denmark_n_4674547.html. Accessed 4 April 2014.

  • Hunt L (2007) Inventing Human Rights. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff M (2001) Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy D (1997) A Critique of Adjudication. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • Klein O, Muis J (2018) Online discontent: comparing Western European far-right groups on Facebook. European societies 21(4):540–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Figaro (Online) (2019) Publication d'un «livre blanc et noir du terrorisme en Europe». 5 March 2019. https://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2019/03/05/97001-20190305FILWWW00190-publication-d-un-livre-blanc-et-noir-du-terrorisme-en-europe.php?redirect_premium. Accessed 23 December 2019.

  • Lean N (2017) The Islamophobia Industry. 2nd edn. Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman J (2019) Trump administration launches global effort to end criminalization of homosexuality. NBC News. 19 February 2019. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-administration-launches-global-effort-end-criminalization-homosexuality-n973081. Accessed 29 July 2019.

  • Leigh I (2009) Homophobic Speech, Equality Denial, and Religious Expression. In: Hare I, Weinstein J (eds) Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 375–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood S (2005) Politics of Piety. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood S (2016) Religious Difference in a Secular Age. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massad J (2007) Desiring Arabs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A (2013) Islam and Human Rights. 5th edn. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Boli J, Thomas G, Ramirez F (1997) World Society and the Nation‐State. American Journal of Sociology 103(1):144-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry S (2006) Human Rights and Gender Violence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry S (2016) The Seductions of Quantification. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed B (2018) New estimates show U.S. Muslim population continues to grow. 3 January 2018. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/01/03/new-estimates-show-u-s-muslim-population-continues-to-grow/. Accessed 24 December 2019.

  • Monroe-Sheridan A (2018) “Frankly Unthinkable”: The Constitutional Failings of President Trump’s Proposed Muslim Registry. Maine Law Review 70(1):1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn S (2010) The Last Utopia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet R (1969) Social Change and History. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet R (1980) History of the Idea of Progress. Basic Books, New York.

  • Osanloo A (2009) The Politics of Women’s Rights in Iran. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozyurek E (2015) Being German, Becoming Muslim. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Physicians for Social Responsibility (2015) Body Count: Casualty Figures after 10 Years of the “War on Terror.” https://www.psr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/body-count.pdf. Accessed 23 November 2019.

  • Piser K (2018) Muslims Recoil at a French Proposal to Change the Quran. The Atlantic (online). 3 May 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/05/france-delete-verses-quran/559550/. Accessed 25 September 2019.

  • Povinelli E (2001) Radical Worlds: The Anthropology of Incommensurability and Inconceivability. Annual Review of Anthropology 30:319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puar J (2007) Terrorist Assemblages. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranciere J (2004) Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man? South Atlantic Quarterly 103(2/3):297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Right Wing Watch (2016) Michael Flynn: Islam Is A “Cancer,” “Political Ideology” That “Hides Behind” Religion. 18 November 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=72&v=fzh9b_vo4vs. Accessed 23 December 2019.

  • Riles A (2006) Anthropology, Human Rights, and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron Cage. American Anthropologist 108(1):52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said E (1978) Orientalism. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said E (1993) Culture and Imperialism. Vintage, New York.

  • Scott J (2007) The Politics of the Veil. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby J (2012) Questioning French Secularism: Gender Politics and Islam in a Parisian Suburb. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby J (2014) Un/veiling Women’s Bodies: Secularism and Sexuality in Full-face Veil Prohibitions in France and Quebec. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 43(3):439–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein B (2011) Islam and Modernity in Turkey. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slymovics S (2005) The Performance of Human Rights in Morocco. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokol S (2014) Denmark outlaws Jewish and Muslim ritual slaughter as of next week. The Jerusalem Post (Online edition). 14 February 2014. http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/Denmark-outlaws-Jewish-and-Muslim-ritual-slaughter-as-of-next-week-341433. Accessed 5 April 2014.

  • Taylor P (2005) Freedom of Religion. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A (2005) Reading History Sideways. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, Dorius S, Swindle J, Young-DeMarco L, Moaddel M (2017) Middle Eastern Beliefs about the Causal Linkages of Development to Freedom, Democracy, and Human Rights. Sociology of Development 3(1):70–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin Asma (2019) When Islam Is Not a Religion. Pegasus Books, New York.

  • Uitz R (2007) Freedom of Religion in European Constitutional Law and International Case Law. Council of Europe, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. n.d. Arab Human Development Reports. http://www.arab-hdr.org/index.aspx. Accessed 27 April 2014.

  • Walker S (2019) “Matteo Salvini: vote for nationalists to stop European caliphate. Guardian (Online). 2 May 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/02/matteo-salvini-vote-for-nationalist-parties-stop-islamic-caliphate . Accessed 23 December 2019.

  • Waltz S (2001) Universalizing Human Rights: The Role of Small States in the Construction of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 23(1):44–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman S (2017) Geert Wilders, the Islamophobe some call the Dutch Donald Trump, explained. Vox.com, 15 March 2017. https://www.vox.com/world/2017/3/14/14921614/geert-wilders-islamophobia-islam-netherlands-populism-europe. Accessed 22 September 2019.

  • Zizek S (2005) Against Human Rights. New Left Review 34:115–131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aria Nakissa.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakissa, A. Evolving Conceptions of Human Rights as a Bourdieusian Distinction Strategy: A Critical Perspective on Policies Targeting Muslim Populations. Hum Rights Rev 21, 21–42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00579-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00579-w

Keywords

Navigation