Abstract
Diotima’s speech claims that philosophy ranks among the erōtica. The standard reading of this holds that erōs manifests in philosophical activity. This is puzzling. Eros has a reputation for overpowering the psyche, making reasoning impossible. The major interpretive discussion of this puzzle suggests that Diotima (and Plato by proxy) must therefore accept either non-rationalist philosophizing or rationalist erōs. This paper argues for an alternative. The “ancillary activities view” posits that the erōtica do not manifest erōs but are activities undertaken to achieve its telos. On this view, love’s relationship to philosophy is as un-mysterious as wanting something and doing what it takes to get it.
References
Broneer, O. 1932. “Eros and Aphrodite on the North Slope of the Acropolis in Athens”. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 1: 31–55.10.2307/146474Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A. 1991. Greek Lyric, Volume III Stesichorus, Ibycus, Simonides, and Others. Loeb Classical Library 476. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cobb, W. S. 1993. Plato’s Erotic Dialogues. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1950. The Unwritten Philosophy and Other Essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dover, K. 1980. Plato: Symposium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9780511813009Search in Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. 1987. Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659201Search in Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. 1992. “Platonic Love”. In The Cambridge Companion to Plato, edited by R. Kraut, 248–76. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL0521430186.008Search in Google Scholar
Friedlander, P., and (tr.) H. Meyerhoff. 2016 [1958]). Plato 1: An Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1999. Introduction. In Plato: The Symposium. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar
Halperin, D. 1990. “Why Diotima is a Woman”. In One Hundred Years of Homosexuality: And Other Essays on Greek Love, 113–211. New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Hobbs, A. 2000. Plato and the Hero: Courage, Manliness, and the Impersonal Good. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511551437Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1995. Plato’s Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195086457.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1987. “Plato’s Theory of Desire”. Review of Metaphysics 41 (1): 77–103.Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (tr.) 1994. Sophocles: Antigone. The Women of Trachis. Philoctetes. Oedipus at Colonus. Loeb Classical Library 21. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (tr.) 2018. Hesiod: Theogony, Works and Days, Testimonia. Loeb Classical Library 57. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 2007. “‘Only in the Contemplation of Beauty is the Human Life Worth Living’ Plato Symposium 211d”. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (1): 1–18.10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00240.xSearch in Google Scholar
Nehamas, A., and Woodruff, P. (tr.) 1997. “Plato: Symposium”. In Plato’s Complete Works, edited by J. Cooper, and D. S. Hutchinson. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1995. Mental Conflict. New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1997 [1990]. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198248996.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1998. Plato: Symposium. Warminster, UK: Aris and Phillips.Search in Google Scholar
Rowe, C. 2006. “The Symposium as a Socratic Dialogue”. In Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception, edited by J. H. Lesher, D. Nails, and F. C. C. Sheffield. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2000. “Socrates and Alcibiades in the ‘Symposium’”. Hermathena 168: 25–37.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2011. “Philosophy and Madness in the Phaedrus”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 41: 169–200.Search in Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. 2006. Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286775.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1981. “The Individual as an Object of Love”. In Platonic Studies, edited by G. Vlastos, 1–34. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
