Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aging, Sex Ratio, and Genomic Imprinting: Functional and Evolutionary Explanations in Biology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different types of explanations coexist in present-day biology. Functional explanations describe mechanisms, whereas evolutionary explanations provide answers to the question “why?” mostly by appealing to the past and present action of natural selection. But the relations between these two types of explanations, as well as the relative insights they offer, vary from one domain of research to another. We will illustrate this complex landscape of biological explanations with three examples involving aging, the sex ratio, and the phenomenon of genomic imprinting. We will show that the two types of explanations have recently often progressed towards each other. In consequence, they cease to be “pure” functional or evolutionary explanations and become explanations that may be alternatively considered as functional or evolutionary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson PW (1972) More is different. Science 177:393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birchler JA, Veitia RA (2012) Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:14746–14753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra HS (1985) Is human X chromosome inactivation a sex-determining device? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:6947–6949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra HS, Brown SW (1975) Chromosome imprinting and the mammalian X chromosome. Nature 253:165–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra HS, Nanjundiah V (1990) The evolution of genomic imprinting. Development Supplement, p 47–53

  • Crouse HV (1960) The controlling element in sex chromosome behavior in Sciara. Genetics 45:1429–1443

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EH, Erwin DH (2006) Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science 311:796–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day T, Bonduriansky R (2004) Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167:1537–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AW (1998) Natural selection and the sex ratio: fisher’s sources. Am Nat 151:564–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gissis SB, Jablonka E (eds) (2011) Transformations of Lamarckism: from subtle fluids to molecular biology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg C, Zhang J, Butler JE et al (2010) Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 329:682–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeyr JHS, Cornish-Bowden A (2000) Regulating the cellular economy of supply and demand. FEBS Lett 476:47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst LD, McVean GT (1998) Do we understand the evolution of genomic imprinting? Curr Opin Genet Dev 8:701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob F (1973) The logic of life: a history of heredity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob F, Monod J (1961) Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol 3:318–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jursnich VA, Burtis KC (1993) A positive role in differentiation for the male doublesex protein of Drosophila. Dev Biol 155:235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangas AT, Evans AR, Thesleff I et al (2004) Nonindependence of mammalian dental characters. Nature 432:211–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon CJ (2010) The genetics of ageing. Nature 464:504–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood TBL, Austad SN (2000) Why do we age? Nature 408:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1989) Phylogenetic hypotheses under the assumption of neutral quantitative genetic variation. Evolution 43:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1501–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar PB (1952) An unsolved problem of biology. Lewis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore T, Haig D (1991) Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet 7:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller G, Newman SA (eds) (2003) Origins of organismal form. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi A, Duvvuri S (2007) Genomic imprinting—the story of the other half and the conflicts of silencing. J Genet Genomics 34:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanjundiah V (2003a) Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation. In: Müller G, Newman SA (eds) Origins of organismal form. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 245–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanjundiah V (2003b) Alan Turing and “The chemical basis of morphogenesis”. In: Sekimura S, Noji S, Ueno N et al (eds) Morphogenesis and pattern formation in biological systems. Springer, Tokyo, pp 33–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA, Forgacs G (2005) Complexity and self-organization in biological development and evolution. In: Bonchev D, Rouvray DH (eds) Complexity in chemistry, biology and ecology. Springer, New York, pp 49–95

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rao V, Nanjundiah V (2011) J. B. S. Haldane, Ernst Mayr and the beanbag genetics dispute. J Hist Biol 44:233–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose MR, Burke MK, Shahrestani P et al (2008) Evolution of ageing since Darwin. J Genet 87:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saçlıoğlu C, Pekcan Ö, Nanjundiah V (2014) Group behaviour in physical, chemical and biological systems. J Biosci 39:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Wollam J, Magner D et al (2012) A steroid receptor-microRNA switch that regulates lifespan in response to signals from the gonad. Science 338:1472–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns FW (2010) One hundred years of pleiotropy: a retrospective. Genetics 186:767–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Helden J, Toussaint A, Thieffry D (2012) Bacterial molecular networks: bridging the gap between functional genomics and dynamical modelling. Methods Mol Biol 804:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace AR (1858) On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. J Proc Linn Soc Zool 3:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Werren JH (1984) Brood size and sex ratio regulation in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Neth J Zool 34:123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibbels T, Bull JJ, Crews D (1991) Synergism between temperature and estradiol: a common pathway in turtle sex determination. J Exp Zool 260:130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1964) Pleiotropy in the evolution of structural reduction and of dominance. Am Nat 98:65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimniak P (2012) What is the proximal cause of aging? Front Genet 3:189

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to several colleagues, among them Scott Gilbert, Prim Singh, Stuart Newman, Johanna Rutkowska, and H. Sharat Chandra for constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidyanand Nanjundiah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nanjundiah, V., Morange, M. Aging, Sex Ratio, and Genomic Imprinting: Functional and Evolutionary Explanations in Biology. Biol Theory 10, 125–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-014-0195-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-014-0195-6

Keywords

Navigation