Abstract
Different types of explanations coexist in present-day biology. Functional explanations describe mechanisms, whereas evolutionary explanations provide answers to the question “why?” mostly by appealing to the past and present action of natural selection. But the relations between these two types of explanations, as well as the relative insights they offer, vary from one domain of research to another. We will illustrate this complex landscape of biological explanations with three examples involving aging, the sex ratio, and the phenomenon of genomic imprinting. We will show that the two types of explanations have recently often progressed towards each other. In consequence, they cease to be “pure” functional or evolutionary explanations and become explanations that may be alternatively considered as functional or evolutionary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson PW (1972) More is different. Science 177:393–396
Birchler JA, Veitia RA (2012) Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:14746–14753
Chandra HS (1985) Is human X chromosome inactivation a sex-determining device? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:6947–6949
Chandra HS, Brown SW (1975) Chromosome imprinting and the mammalian X chromosome. Nature 253:165–168
Chandra HS, Nanjundiah V (1990) The evolution of genomic imprinting. Development Supplement, p 47–53
Crouse HV (1960) The controlling element in sex chromosome behavior in Sciara. Genetics 45:1429–1443
Davidson EH, Erwin DH (2006) Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science 311:796–800
Day T, Bonduriansky R (2004) Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167:1537–1546
Edwards AW (1998) Natural selection and the sex ratio: fisher’s sources. Am Nat 151:564–569
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Gissis SB, Jablonka E (eds) (2011) Transformations of Lamarckism: from subtle fluids to molecular biology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Gregg C, Zhang J, Butler JE et al (2010) Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 329:682–685
Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488
Hofmeyr JHS, Cornish-Bowden A (2000) Regulating the cellular economy of supply and demand. FEBS Lett 476:47–51
Hurst LD, McVean GT (1998) Do we understand the evolution of genomic imprinting? Curr Opin Genet Dev 8:701–708
Jacob F (1973) The logic of life: a history of heredity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Jacob F, Monod J (1961) Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol 3:318–356
Jursnich VA, Burtis KC (1993) A positive role in differentiation for the male doublesex protein of Drosophila. Dev Biol 155:235–249
Kangas AT, Evans AR, Thesleff I et al (2004) Nonindependence of mammalian dental characters. Nature 432:211–214
Kenyon CJ (2010) The genetics of ageing. Nature 464:504–512
Kirkwood TBL, Austad SN (2000) Why do we age? Nature 408:233–238
Lynch M (1989) Phylogenetic hypotheses under the assumption of neutral quantitative genetic variation. Evolution 43:1–17
Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1501–1506
Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Medawar PB (1952) An unsolved problem of biology. Lewis, London
Moore T, Haig D (1991) Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet 7:45–49
Müller G, Newman SA (eds) (2003) Origins of organismal form. MIT Press, Cambridge
Munshi A, Duvvuri S (2007) Genomic imprinting—the story of the other half and the conflicts of silencing. J Genet Genomics 34:93–103
Nanjundiah V (2003a) Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation. In: Müller G, Newman SA (eds) Origins of organismal form. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 245–263
Nanjundiah V (2003b) Alan Turing and “The chemical basis of morphogenesis”. In: Sekimura S, Noji S, Ueno N et al (eds) Morphogenesis and pattern formation in biological systems. Springer, Tokyo, pp 33–44
Newman SA, Forgacs G (2005) Complexity and self-organization in biological development and evolution. In: Bonchev D, Rouvray DH (eds) Complexity in chemistry, biology and ecology. Springer, New York, pp 49–95
Rao V, Nanjundiah V (2011) J. B. S. Haldane, Ernst Mayr and the beanbag genetics dispute. J Hist Biol 44:233–281
Rose MR, Burke MK, Shahrestani P et al (2008) Evolution of ageing since Darwin. J Genet 87:363–371
Saçlıoğlu C, Pekcan Ö, Nanjundiah V (2014) Group behaviour in physical, chemical and biological systems. J Biosci 39:1–13
Shen Y, Wollam J, Magner D et al (2012) A steroid receptor-microRNA switch that regulates lifespan in response to signals from the gonad. Science 338:1472–1476
Stearns FW (2010) One hundred years of pleiotropy: a retrospective. Genetics 186:767–773
van Helden J, Toussaint A, Thieffry D (2012) Bacterial molecular networks: bridging the gap between functional genomics and dynamical modelling. Methods Mol Biol 804:1–11
Wallace AR (1858) On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. J Proc Linn Soc Zool 3:53–62
Werren JH (1984) Brood size and sex ratio regulation in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Neth J Zool 34:123–143
Wibbels T, Bull JJ, Crews D (1991) Synergism between temperature and estradiol: a common pathway in turtle sex determination. J Exp Zool 260:130–134
Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411
Wright S (1964) Pleiotropy in the evolution of structural reduction and of dominance. Am Nat 98:65–69
Zimniak P (2012) What is the proximal cause of aging? Front Genet 3:189
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to several colleagues, among them Scott Gilbert, Prim Singh, Stuart Newman, Johanna Rutkowska, and H. Sharat Chandra for constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nanjundiah, V., Morange, M. Aging, Sex Ratio, and Genomic Imprinting: Functional and Evolutionary Explanations in Biology. Biol Theory 10, 125–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-014-0195-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-014-0195-6