Skip to main content
Log in

Existential Beliefs and Values

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on values is extensive. Values and value systems are concepts that have interested researchers across domains such as psychology, sociology, and anthropology. However, antecedents of values have not received sufficient attention. In this study, we develop and assess a personal value system from the ancient texts of India. The texts describe a system of existential beliefs and values or prescriptive beliefs. Existential beliefs are concerned with the nature of reality. Prescriptive beliefs or values follow from these existential beliefs, and behavior is influenced by values. The content of existential beliefs and the implied values or prescriptive beliefs are extracted from the texts and a conceptual model of the belief system is developed. Scales are constructed and administered to a sample of subjects. Responses from the survey are analyzed using a structural equation modeling framework. Confirmatory factor analysis is used to assess the scales and establish their adequacy. The nomological net of existential beliefs and values is empirically assessed, and construct validity is examined. Results support the belief system described in the texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aish, A.M., and Joreskog, K.G.: 1990, “A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares”, Quality and Quantity, 19, 716-723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M.: 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., L. Vernon and G. Lindsey: 1960, Assessment of Human Motives (Rinehart, New York)

  • Anderson, J.C., and Gerbing, D.W.: 1984, “The effects of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis”, Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.C., and Gerbing, D.W.: 1988, “Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, P. G., Y. Kashima and N. Haslam: 2006, `Conceptual Beliefs about Human Values and their Implications: Human Nature Beliefs Predict Value Importance, Value Trade-Offs, and Responses to Value-Laden Rhetoric', Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 91, 351–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M.: 1990, ‘Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models’, Psychological Bulletin 107, 238–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. M., G. R. Maio and J. M. Olson: 2003, ‘Effects of Introspection About Reasons for Values: Extending Research on Values-as-Truisms’, Social Cognition 21(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, P.E. & Becker, B.W.: 1994, “Personal values and Management: What do we know and why don’t we know more? “, Journal of Management Inquiry, 3 (1), 67-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E.: 1984, “Subjective well-being”, Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E.: 2000, “Subjective well-being: The science of happiness, and a proposal for a national index”, American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, G.W.: 1967, “Personal values systems of American managers”, Academy of Management Journal, 10, 53-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R.H.: 1986, “How do Attitudes guide Behavior?”, in R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgens (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundation of Social Behavior. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather N. T.: 1995, “Values, valences, and choices: the influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 1135-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli, K. M.: 1883, ‘The Mahabharatha of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa’, Mahabharatha Online.Com.

  • Griffith, Ralph T.H: 1915, “Ramayan of Valmiki”, Low Price Publications, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R. T. H: 2005, ‘The Rig Veda’, translator, II Intra Text Edition CT, Eulogos.

  • Hitlin, S.: 2003, ‘Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links Between Two Theories of Self’, Social Psychology Quarterly 66(2), 118–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S. and J. A. Piliavin: 2004, “Values: Reviving a dormant concept”, Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobhouse, L.T.: 1905, “The Theory of Knowledge”, London: Meuthen and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1980, “Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values”, Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, P.M. & L.R. Kahle.: 1988, “A Structural Equation Test of the Value-Attitude-Behavior Hierarchy”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 638-646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H.: 2000, “The Genesis of Values”, Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K.G.: 1993, “Testing structural equation models”, in Kenneth A. Bollen and J. Scott Long (eds) Testing structural equation models, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B.: 1998, “Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling”, The Guilford Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C.: 1951, “Values and value-orientations in the theory of action”, in T. Parsons, EA Shils (eds) “Toward a General Theory of Action”, pp. 388-433. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriger, M. & Y. Seng.: 2005, “Leadership with Inner Meaning: A Contingency Theory of Leadership based on the Worldviews of Five Religions,” The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 771-806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., Au, A., Huang, X., Kurman, J., Niit, T., and Niit, K.: 2007, “Social axioms and values: A cross-cultural examination”, European Journal of Personality, 21, 91-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A.: 1976, “The nature and causes of job satisfaction”, in Dunnette, M.D. (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp. 1297-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maio, G.R. and J.M. Olson.: 1998, “Values as truisms: Evidence and implications”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 294-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W.J.: 1964, “Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches”, In L.Berkowitz (eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191-229). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meglino, B. M. and E. C. Ravlin: 1998, ‘Individual Values in Organizations: Concepts, Controversies, and Research’, Journal of Management 24(3), 351–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, W.P.: 1925, “The Ways of Knowing”, London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B.Z. & Schmidt, W.H. (1996) “The values of Business and Federal government executives: More different than alike”. Public Personnel Management, 25(3), 277–0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1973) “The Bhagavad Gita”. Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S. (1994) “The Principal Upanishads”. Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S. & Moore, C.A. (1957), “A Source Book in Indian Philosophy”. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohan, M.: 2000, ‘A Rose by any Name? The Values Construct’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(3), 255–277.

  • Rokeach, M.: 1968, “Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values”, Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M.: 1973, “The Nature of Human Values”, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros, M., Schwartz, S.H. and Surkis, S.: 1999, “Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48 (1), 49-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royce, J.R.: 1964, “The encapsulated man”, Princeton, NJ: Von Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C.D.: 1989, “Happiness is everything or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satprakashananda: 1974, “Methods of Knowledge”, Advaita Ashrama, Mayawati.

  • Schein, E.H.: 1985, “Organizational culture and leadership”. San Francisco Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz S.H.: 1992, “Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values?”, Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H.: 1999, “A theory of cultural values and some implications for work”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48 (1), 23-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H.,& Bilsky, W.: 1987, $#x2018;Toward a psychological structure of human values”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H.,& W. Bilsky.: 1990, “Toward a psychological structure of human values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stackman, R.W., C.C. Pinder & P.E. Connor.: 2000, “Values lost: Redirecting research on Values in the Workplace”, in N. Ashkanasy et.al. (eds.), Handbook of Organization Culture and Climate (pp. 37-54), Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S.: 1980, “Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version”, Menlo Park. C.A. Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, Henri: 1981, “Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology”, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 1988, “The moral topography of the self”, in S.B. Messer, L.A. Saas & R.A. Woolfolk (eds), Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on personality, psychotherapy and psychopathology (pp 288-320), New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 1989, “Sources of the Self: The making of the modern identity”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E.: 1986, “A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E., Peterson, R.S. and Lerner J.S.: 1996, “Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates”. In Seligman, C. Olson JM. And Zanna M.P. (eds.) The Ontario Symposium: The Psychology of Values. Marwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.M. Jr.: 1968, “The Concept of Values”, In D.L. Sills (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan & Free Press, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.M. Jr.: 1979, “Change and Stability in Values and Value Systems: A Sociological Perspective”, in M. Rokeach (Ed.), Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal. New York: The Free Press, 16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Niranjan Narasimhan, Kumar Bhaskar or Srinivas Prakhya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narasimhan, N., Bhaskar, K. & Prakhya, S. Existential Beliefs and Values. J Bus Ethics 96, 369–382 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0472-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0472-7

Keywords

Navigation