Skip to main content
Log in

Western and Russian Traditions of Big History: A Philosophical Insight

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Big History – an integral conception of the past since the Big Bang until today – is a novel subject of cross-disciplinary interest. The concept was construed in the 1980–1990s simultaneously in different countries, after relevant premises had matured in the sciences and humanities.

Various versions and traditions of Big History are considered in the article. Particularly, most of the Western authors emphasize the idea of equilibrium, and thus reduce cosmic, biological, and social evolution to the mass-energy processes; the informational parameter involving all mental and spiritual aspects are seen as epiphenomena of material structures” complication that do not play their own role in evolution. In Russian tradition ascending to A. Bogdanov, E. Bauer, I. Prigogine, and E. Jantsch, sustainable non-equilibrium patterns are used. This implies attention to the pan-material sources and evolution of mental capacities and spiritual culture (as basic anti-entropy instruments) and humans” growing intervention in the material processes on Earth and outside it.

The non-equilibrium approach in the context of modern control and self-organization theories, alters the portrayal of the past, and still more dramatically, estimation of the civilization’s potential perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer, E.S.: 1935, Theoretical Biology, VIEM, Moscow, 206 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdyaev, N.A.: 1990, The Sense of History, Mysl, Moscow, 175 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, L.S.: 1977, Oeuvre on Evolution Theory, Nauka, Leningrad, 387 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanov, A.A.: 1996, Bogdanov’s Tektology. Book 1, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull, UK, 322 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaisson, E.J.: 2001, Cosmic Evolution: The Rice of Complexity in Nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 280 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chick, G.: 1998, ‘Games in Culture Revisited’, Cross-Cultural Res. 32(2), 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, D.: 1991, ‘The Case for “Big History”’, J. World History 2(2), 223–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, D.: 2004, Maps of Time: An Introduction to ‘Big History’, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 588 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.C.W.: 1982, The Accidental Universe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 139 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D.: 1998, The Fabric of Reality, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 390 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druzhinin, V.V. and Kontorov, D.S.: 1976, Problems of System Science on Sovetskoe Radio, Moscow, 296 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorovich, I.V.: 2000, Conceptions of Modern Science in the Aspect of Universal History. A University Program and Methodic, Syktyvkar State University, Syktyvkar, 35 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorovich, I.V.: 2002, ‘Conceptions of Modern Science’, Universal History Position. Mercury of Russian International University, FSE Series, #7(1–2), pp. 33–43 (in Russian).

  • Golubev, V.S.: 1992, Evolution: From Geochemical Systems to the Noosphere, Nauka, Moscow, 109 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huges-Warrington, M.: 2002, ‘Big History, Historically Speaking’, Bull. Historical Soc. IV(2), November, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huzen, A.M.: 2000, Nature’s Intelligence and Human Intelligence, Book 3, Novel Editorial, Moscow, 33 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E.: 1980, The Self-Organizing Universe. Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution, Pergamon Press, NY, 343 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1984, The Psychology of Moral Development, Harper & Row, NY, 729 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefevre, V.A.: 1996, The Cosmic Agent, IPAN, Moscow, 183 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Goff, J.: 1977, Le civisation de l’occident medieval, Arthaud, Paris, 330 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, A.D.: 1990, Physics of Elementary Particles, and Inflation Cosmology, Nauka, Moscow, 275 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K.: 1981, Das sogenannte Böse (L. Zur Naturgechichte der Agression), Dt. Taschenbuch Verlach, München, 261S.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J.R.M. and McNeill, W.: 2003, The Human Web. A Bird’s Eye View of World History, Norton & Co., NY, 368 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseev, N.N.: 1986, ‘Co-evolution of Humans and Biosphere: The Cybernetic Aspects’, in Cybernetics and Noosphere, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 65–83 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseev, N.N.: 1991, ‘Universal Evolutionism (The Conception, and the Consequences)’, Problems Philos. 3, 2–28 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, R.L., Hulefeld, R., Rogers, J.M., Tomeo, D.L., and Yamazaki, S.K.: 2000, ‘Aggression Among Children in Four Cultures’, Cross-Cultural Res. 34(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazaretyan, A.P.: 1991 Intelligence in the Universe: Sources, Formation, Prospects Nedra, Moscow, 222 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazaretyan, A.P.: 2002, ‘Dread of the Deceased as Social Self-Organization Factor’, Problems Philos. 11, 73–84 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazaretyan, A.P.: 2003, ‘Power and Wisdom: Toward a History of Social Behavior’, J. Theory Social Behav. 33(4), December, 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazaretyan, A.P.: 2004, Civilization Crises Within the Context of Universal History. Self-Organization, Psychology, and Global Forecasts, Per Se, Moscow (2nd edition), 339 pp. (in Russian).

  • Novikov, I.D.: 1988, How did the Universe Burst?, Nauka, Moscow, 175 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panov, A.D.: 2004, ‘The Crisis of Universal History’s Planetary Cycle’, Mercury Russ. Acad. Sci. 74(6), 537–550 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I.R.: 1981 From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 272 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E.: 1944, What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell’s with Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 178 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self-Organization Processes in Big (Universal) History, Abstracts of the International Symposium (Belgorod, September 29–October 2, 2004), Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Moscow, 216 pp. cf. note 1.

  • Snooks, G.D.: 1996, The Dynamic Society. Exploring the Sources of Global Change, Routledge, London and NY, 491 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, O.: 1980, Der Untergang der Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgechichte, Dt. Taschenbuch Verlag, München, p. 1269S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spier, F.: 1996, The Structure of Big History. From the Big Bang Until Today, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 113 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universal History: The Cross-Disciplinary Approaches: 2001, Collection of Articles, part I, in Fedorovich et al. (eds.), Syktyvkar State University, Syktyvkar, 356 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadsky, V.I.: 1978, Living Matter, Nauka, Moscow, 258 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, N.: 1950, The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, 241 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhdanov, Yu.A.: 1983, ‘Materialist Dialectic, and Chemical Evolution’, in Dialectic in Sciences and Humanities, Science, Moscow, pp. 46–79 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akop P. Nazaretyan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nazaretyan, A.P. Western and Russian Traditions of Big History: A Philosophical Insight. J Gen Philos Sci 36, 63–80 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-005-7154-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-005-7154-7

Keywords

Navigation