Skip to main content

Persistence, Polarity, and Plurality

  • Chapter
Reference and Anaphoric Relations

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 72))

  • 210 Accesses

Abstract

(A), (B), and (C) below are taken by many semanticists to be good working hypotheses:

  1. (A)

    A sentence of the form the As are Bs is true (on its distributive reading) if and only if every A is B and there is more than one A (Russell 1919, Chomsky 1975, Evans 1977, Neale 1990).

  2. (B)

    So-called “negative polarity” expressions like ever and any can occur only in “downward entailing” (↓) environments (Ladusaw 1981, May 1985, Larson 1990).

  3. (C)

    Plural descriptions may contain negative polarity items, as in the following example, from May (1985):

    1. (1)

      The students who had ever read anything about phrenology attended Gall’s lecture.

Thanks to William Craig, Richard Larson, Peter Ludlow, Robert May, and Barry Smith for discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barwise, J. & Cooper, R. 1981. Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1975. Questions of Form and Interpretation. Linguistic Analysis 1, 75–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. 1977. Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses (I). Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 467–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. & May, R. 1981. Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing. Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W. 1981. On the Notion ‘Affective’ in the Analysis of Negative Polarity Items. Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. 1990. Semantics. In: D. Osherson & H. Lasnik (eds.). Language: An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 1. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1975. Adverbs of Quantification. In: E. Keenan(ed.). Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge/CA: Cambridge University Press, 3–15.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. 1993. Grammatical Form, Logical Form, and Incomplete Symbols. In: A. Irvine & G. Wedeking (eds.). Russell and Analytic Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 97–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1905. On Denoting. Mind 14, 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. & Whitehead, A. 1925. Principia Mathematica. Vol. I. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. 1980. “Most” and “All”: Some Comments on a Familiar Programme, and on the Logical Form of Quantified Sentences. In: M. Platts (ed.). Reference, Truth, and Reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 318–346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neale, S. (2000). Persistence, Polarity, and Plurality. In: von Heusinger, K., Egli, U. (eds) Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0291-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3947-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics