Abstract
The influence of Phaedrus the fabulist on Martial the epigrammatist has long been neglected by scholarship. Quite recently scholars have started to pay more attention to Phaedrus’ literary techniques and allusive art, thus also paving the way for a reassessment of the role which Phaedrus played as a model for Martial. This paper examines the question to what extent the Flavian epigrammatist was inspired by Phaedrus’ literary techniques and argues that Phaedrus served as an important link in the process of the reception of Neoteric and Augustan poetry. Although there are not many thematic parallels between Phaedrus and Martial, the later poet seems to have been inspired considerably by Phaedrus’ metapoetic techniques. Furthermore, the paper also investigates the epigrammatic potential of Phaedrus’ own poems, a potential which seems to have made the fabulist especially attractive as a model for Martial.
Bibliographie
Adams, J. N. (1982): The Latin Sexual Vocabulary, London (= 31990).10.56021/9780801829680Search in Google Scholar
Adrados, F. R. (1999): History of the Graeco-Latin Fable I: Introduction and from the Origins to the Hellenistic Age, Leiden/Boston/Köln.10.1163/9789004351202Search in Google Scholar
Adrados, F. R. (2000): History of the Graeco-Latin Fable II: The Fable during the Roman Empire and the Middle Ages, Leiden/Boston/Köln.10.1163/9789004351127Search in Google Scholar
Adrados, F. R. (2003): History of the Graeco-Latin Fable III: Inventory and Documentation of the Graeco-Latin Fable, Leiden/Boston/Köln.10.1163/9789004350885Search in Google Scholar
Bing, P. / Bruss, J. S. (2007; Hrsg.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram, Leiden/Boston.10.1163/9789047419402Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1993): The Greek Anthology from Meleager to Planudes, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Canobbio, A. (2011): M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton liber quintus. Introduzione, edizione critica, traduzione e commento, Napoli.Search in Google Scholar
Carlson, G. I. (2011): „Phaedrus, a Fable, and Fun“, in: Heil/Korn/Sauer (2011), 12 – 4.Search in Google Scholar
Carratello, U. (1964): „Marziale, Canio Rufo e Fedro“, GIF 17, 122 – 48.Search in Google Scholar
Champlin, E. (2005): „Phaedrus the Fabulous“, JRS 95, 97 – 135.10.3815/000000005784016252Search in Google Scholar
Christodoulou, M. (2020): „Fables in Epigrams of the Greek Anthology“, AntCl 89, 81 – 101.Search in Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (1989): „Marziale e la letteratura per i Saturnali (poetica dell’ intrattenimento e cronologia della pubblicazione dei libri)“, ICS 14, 201 – 26.Search in Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (1992): „Letteratura per i Saturnali e poetica dell’intrattenimento“, SIFC 10, 425 – 47.Search in Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (1975): M. Valerii Martialis epigrammaton liber primus, Firenze.Search in Google Scholar
Cortés-Tovar, R. (2004): Epigrama y sátira: relaciones entre la poética de Marcial y la de los satíricos“, in: Iso Echegoyen, J. J. (Hrsg.): Hominem pagina nostra sapit. Marcial, 1900 años después, Zaragoza, 35 – 56.Search in Google Scholar
Cortés-Tovar, R. (2015): „Fábula y sátira: relaciones entre la poética de Fedro y las declaraciones programáticas de los satíricos“, Lat 74, 339 – 64.Search in Google Scholar
Dadone, M. (1954): „Appunti sulla fortuna di Fedro: III. Fedro e Marziale“, RSC 2, 83 – 6.Search in Google Scholar
Dijk, G.-J. van (1997): ΑΙΝΟΙ, ΛΟΓΟΙ, ΜΥΘΟΙ. Fables in Archaic, Classical, and Hellenistic Greek Literature, Leiden.Search in Google Scholar
Dijk, G.-J. van (2015): Aesopica poesteriora. Medieval and Modern Versions of Greek and Latin Fables, 2 Bde., Milano.Search in Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2007): Martial: The World of the Epigram, Chicago/London.10.7208/chicago/9780226252568.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2007): Stratone di Sardi. Epigrammi. Testo critico, traduzione e commento, Alessandria.Search in Google Scholar
Floridi, L. / Neger, M. (im Druck): „ Grenouille / The Frog“, in: Guez, J. / Klein, F. / Peigney, J. / Prioux, E. (Hrsg.): Dictionnaire des Images du Poétique.Search in Google Scholar
Friedlaender, L. (1886): M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton Libri mit erklärenden Anmerkungen versehen, 2 Bde., Leipzig (Nachdruck: Amsterdam 1961).Search in Google Scholar
Fusi, A. (2006): M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton liber tertius. Introduzione, edizione critica, traduzione e commento, Hildesheim/Zürich/New York.Search in Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2007): „levi calamo ludimus. Zum poetologischen Spiel bei Phaedrus“, H. 135, 429 – 57.10.25162/hermes-2007-0039Search in Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2011a): „De lusu et severitate“, in: Heil/Korn/Sauer (2011), 294 – 302.Search in Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2011b): „Maske, Perle, Feile, Lyra. Phaedrus, die literarische Gattung und die klassische Bildung“, H. 139, 216 – 48.10.25162/hermes-2011-0019Search in Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2015): Phaedrus. Ein Interpretationskommentar zum ersten Buch der Fabeln, München (Open-Access-Version auf OpenEdition Books).10.4000/books.chbeck.1578Search in Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2017): „From Aeschylus to Phaedrus. Fables in tragedy, tragedy in fables“, QCCC 33, 37 – 57.Search in Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2021): Phaedrus. Ein Interpretationskommentar zum zweiten und dritten Buch der Fabeln, München.Search in Google Scholar
Gaffney, G. E. (1976): Mimic Elements in Martial’s Epigrammaton Libri XII, Diss. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TE.Search in Google Scholar
Grewing, F. F. (1998; Hrsg.): Toto notus in orbe. Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar
Grewing, F. F. / Acosta-Hughes, B. / Kirichenko, A. (2013; Hrsg.): The Door Ajar. False Closure in Roman Literature and Art, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Guaglianone, A. (1969): Phaedri Augusti liberti liber fabularum, Torino.Search in Google Scholar
Guarino, A. (1972): „La società col leone“, Lab 18, 72 – 7.Search in Google Scholar
Guipponi-Gineste, M.-F. / Urlacher-Becht, C. (2013; Hrsg.): La renaissance de l’épigramme dans la latinité tardive, Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (1998): Poetic Garlands. Hellenistic Epigrams in Context, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London.10.1525/9780520918979Search in Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2005; Hrsg.): The New Posidippus. A Hellenistic Poetry Book, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Heil, A. / Korn, M. / Sauer, J. (Hrsg.): Noctes Sinenses. Festschrift für Fritz-Heiner Mutschler zum 65. Geburtstag, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2001): Telling Tales on Caesar. Roman Stories from Phaedrus, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Henriksén, C. (2012): A Commentary on Martial, Epigrams Book 9, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Henriksén, C. (2019; Hrsg.): A Companion to Ancient Epigram, Hoboken.10.1002/9781118841709Search in Google Scholar
Heraeus, W. (1925): M. Valerii Martialis epigrammaton libri, Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998): Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (2007): „Martial’s Ovid / Ovid’s Martial“, JRS 97, 113 – 54.10.3815/000000007784016098Search in Google Scholar
Höschele, R. (2010): Die blütenlesende Muse. Textualität und Poetik antiker Epigrammsammlungen, Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (1992; Hrsg.): Der Äsop-Roman. Motivgeschichte und Erzählstruktur, Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2002a): Die antike Fabel, Darmstadt.Search in Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2002b): Martial und das antike Epigramm, Darmstadt.Search in Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2006): „Onomato-poetics: a linear reading of Martial 7,67 – 70“, in: Booth, J. / Maltby, R. (Hrsg.): What's in a Name? The Significance of Proper Names in Classical Latin Literature, Swansea, 145 – 58.10.2307/j.ctvvn9pr.12Search in Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2011): „Applaus für Maro. Eine ‚augusteische‘ Interpretation von Mart. 9, 33“, in: Heil/Korn/Sauer (2011), 59 – 64.Search in Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2018): Phaedrus, Fabeln. Lateinisch-deutsch, Berlin/Boston (Tusculum).Search in Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2021): Leben und Fabeln Äsops, Berlin/Boston (Tusculum).10.1515/9783110713282Search in Google Scholar
Howell, P. (1980): A Commentary on Book One of the Epigrams of Martial, London.Search in Google Scholar
Johannsen, N. (2006): Dichter über ihre Gedichte. Die Prosavorreden in den „Epigrammaton libri“ Martials und in den „Silvae“ des Statius, Göttingen.10.13109/9783666252655Search in Google Scholar
Kröner, H.-O. (1987): „Das literarische Selbstverständnis Martials“, in: Bádenas de la Peña, P. u. a. (Hrsg.): Athlon. Satura grammatica in honorem Francisci R. Adrados, Bd. 2, Madrid, 469 – 84.Search in Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2011): Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Martin Classical Lectures. Princeton/Oxford.10.1515/9781400836567Search in Google Scholar
Kurth, T. (1994): Senecas Trostschrift an Polybius (Dialog 11). Ein Kommentar, Stuttgart/Leipzig.10.1515/9783110950366Search in Google Scholar
Lagioia, A. (2020): „Il Risus di Canio Rufo e il Lusus di Marziale (3.20)“, Lex 38, 251 – 66.10.30687/Lexis/2210-8823/2020/01/011Search in Google Scholar
Laidlaw, W. A. (1960): „Cicero and the Stage“, Herm 94, 56 – 66.Search in Google Scholar
Lausberg, M. (1982): Das Einzeldistichon. Studien zum antiken Epigramm, München.Search in Google Scholar
Leary, T. J. (1996): Martial Book XIV: the Apophoreta. Text with Introduction and Commentary, London.Search in Google Scholar
Leary, T. J. (2001): Martial. Book XIII: The Xenia. Text with Introduction and Commentary, London.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, K. (1945): „A Roman Poet Visits a Museum“, Hesp 14, 259 – 69.10.2307/146711Search in Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (21929): M. Val. Martialis Epigrammata. Recognovit brevique adnotatione instruxit, Oxford (zuerst: 1902; Nachdruck: 1989).Search in Google Scholar
Livingstone, N. / Nisbet, G. (2010): Epigram, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Lobe, M. (2000): „Die Fabel vom Frosch und Ochsen bei Phädrus, Martial und Horaz“, Anreg. 46, 158 – 64.Search in Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. (2002): Erotik und Panegyrik. Martials epigrammatische Kaiser, Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. (2006): „Martial and the Writer Canius Rufus“, in: Nauta, R. / van Dam, H.-J. / Smolenaars, J. J. L. (2006; Hrsg.): Flavian Poetry, Leiden/Boston, 315 – 28.10.1163/9789047417712_020Search in Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2016): Römisches Theater. Von den Anfängen bis zur frühen Kaiserzeit, Tübingen.10.36198/9783838545813Search in Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. (2007): „Marziale e il neoterismo“, in: Bonadeo, A. / Romano, E. (Hrsg.): Dialogando con il passato. Permanenze e innovazioni nella cultura latina di età flavia, Firenze, 177 – 206.Search in Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. (2008): „Fedro, Marziale e il nuovo impegno del lusus poetico“, in: Arduini, P. u. a. (Hrsg.): Studi offerti ad Alessandro Perutelli, Roma, 191 – 203.Search in Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. (2010): „Ad cothurnum ascendere. Fedro, Marziale, Apuleio e le tentazioni del sublime“, Pr. 36, 2010, 168 – 84.Search in Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. (2011): „Favola ed epigramma: interazioni tra generi ‚minori‘ (a proposito di Phaedr. 5, 8; Auson. epigr. 12 e 79 Green)“, SIFC 104, 197 – 232.Search in Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. (2014): „Prometeo ebbro e i suoi monstra (a proposito di Mart. 14,182 e Phaedr. 4,16)“, Lex 32, 315 – 30.Search in Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. (2022): „Apuleius, Phaedrus, Martial and the Intersection of Genres“, in: Futre Pinheiro, M. P. / Morgan, J. P. (Hrsg.): Literary Memory and New Voices in the Ancient Novel, Groningen, 67 – 82.10.2307/j.ctv2wbz0n9.11Search in Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1980): „Neoptolemos von Parion“, RhM 123, 1 – 24.Search in Google Scholar
Mindt, N. (2013): Martials ‚epigrammatischer Kanon‘, München.10.4000/books.chbeck.3377Search in Google Scholar
Moreno Soldevila, R. (2006): Martial, Book IV: a Commentary, Leiden/Boston.10.1163/9789047409892Search in Google Scholar
Mulligan, B. (2019): „Obscenity in Epigram“, in: Henriksén (2019), 111 – 26.10.1002/9781118841709.ch6Search in Google Scholar
Neger, M. (2012): Martials Dichtergedichte. Das Epigramm als Medium der poetischen Selbstreflexion, Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar
Oberg, E. (2000): Phaedrus-Kommentar, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar
Offermann, H. (1980): „Uno tibi sim minor Catullo“, QUCC n. s. 5, 107 – 39.10.2307/20538644Search in Google Scholar
Park, J. (2017): Interfiguralität bei Phaedrus. Ein fabelhafter Fall von Selbstinszenierung, Berlin/Boston.10.1515/9783110528992Search in Google Scholar
Paukstadt, R. (1876): De Martiale Catulli imitatore, Diss. Halle.Search in Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. (1952): Aesopica, Illinois (= New York 2007).Search in Google Scholar
Pitcher, R. A. (1998): „Martial’s Debt to Ovid“, in: Grewing (1998), 59 – 76.Search in Google Scholar
Puelma, M. (1996): „ἐπίγραμμα – epigramma: Aspekte einer Wortgeschichte“, MH 53, 123 – 39.Search in Google Scholar
Renda, C. (2012): Illitteratum plausum nec desidero. Fedro, la favola, e la poesia, Napoli.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1975): Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Schöffel, C. (2002): Martial, Buch 8. Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar
Seibold, S. (2016): „Von verliebten Wieseln und scharrenden Hühnern – Aphrodite in der antiken Fabel (Aes. 50; Babr. 32 und 10; Phaedr. App. 11)“, RhM 159, 290 – 315.Search in Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1993): Martial. Epigrams. Edited and Translated, 3 Bde., Cambridge, MA/London (Loeb).Search in Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. (1991): Martial: the Unexpected Classic. A Literary and Historical Study, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511582639Search in Google Scholar
Swann, B. (1994): Martial’s Catullus: The Reception of an Epigrammatic Rival, Hildesheim.Search in Google Scholar
Swann, B. (1998): „Sic scribit Catullus: The Importance of Catullus for Martial’s Epigrams“, in: Grewing (1998), 48 – 58.Search in Google Scholar
Szelest, H. (1996): „Kanius Rufus i Fedrus (Mart. III 20, 5)“, in: Lewandowskiego, I. / Limana, K. (Hrsg.): Litteris vivere. Księga pamiątkowa ofiarowana Profesorowi Andrzeijowi Wólcikowi, Poznań, 95 – 101.Search in Google Scholar
Szelest, H. (1999): „Ovid und Martial“, in: Schubert, W. (Hrsg.): Ovid: Werk und Wirkung, Frankfurt a. M., 861 – 4.Search in Google Scholar
Weinreich, O. (1931): Fabel, Aretalogie, Novelle. Beiträge zu Phädrus, Petron, Martial und Apuleius, Heidelberg (Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse 7).Search in Google Scholar
Whitton, C. (2019): The Arts of Imitation in Latin Prose. Pliny’s Epistles / Quintilian in Brief, Cambridge.10.1017/9781108688550Search in Google Scholar
Williams, C. (2004): Martial, Epigrams, Book Two. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary, New York/Oxford.10.1093/actrade/9780195155310.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Zafiropoulos, C. (2011): „Socrates and Aesop. A few notes on Plato’s portrait of the arch-philosopher“, GLB 16, 203 – 16.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
