Skip to main content
Log in

A Critical Analysis of the Accounting Industry’s Voluntary Code of Conduct

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The public accounting industry’s voluntary code of conduct in the United States is the American Institute of CPA’s Code of Professional Conduct. Based on our analysis, we conclude that the accounting industry’s current code is limited in its ability to serve the public interest in three respects. Specifically, the code is input-based, requires no third-party attestation of compliance with the code, and contains no public reporting process of code compliance/noncompliance at the accounting firm level. We propose that the accounting profession should reorient its largely input-based Code of Professional Conduct to include output-based performance measurements. We also conclude that third-party attestation of compliance with the profession’s code would help to promote compliance. Finally, we maintain that the accounting industry should initiate a public reporting process at the individual accounting firm level. Such a requirement would add a degree of public accountability as to whether a firm complies or fails to comply with the industry’s voluntary code of conduct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Bar Association: 2004, Model Rules of Professional Conduct,ABA Publishing, available at: http://www.abanet.org/cpr/.

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: 2004, Professional Standards, Section ET 52.01-57.03, available at: http://www.aicpa.org/about/code/sec50.htm.

  • A. Collins N. Schultz (1995) ArticleTitle‘A Critical Examination of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct’ Journal of Business Ethics 14 IssueID1 31–41 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00873733 Occurrence HandleA1995QF23200003

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • J. Dillard K. Yuthas (2002) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Audit Decisions: A Structuration Perspective’ Journal of Business Ethics 36 IssueID1/2 49–64 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014244109742 Occurrence Handle000173989100005

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • R. Elliot D. Pallais (1997) ArticleTitle‘First: Know Your Market’ Journal of Accountancy 184 IssueID1 56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • JD Powers and Associates: 2004, ‘Professional Services’, available at: http://www.jdpower.com.

  • S. Moriarity (2000) ArticleTitle‘Trends in Ethical Sanctions within the Accounting Profession’ Accounting Horizons 14 IssueID4 427–439 Occurrence Handle10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Prakash (2000) ArticleTitle‘Responsible Care: An Assessment’ Business and Society 39 IssueID2 183–209 Occurrence Handle10.1177/000765030003900204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Preston D. Cooper D. Scarbrough R. Chilton (1995) ArticleTitle‘Changes in the Code of Ethics of the U.S. Accounting Profession, 1917 and 1988: The Continual Quest for Legitimation’ Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 IssueID6 507–546 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0361-3682(94)00033-R Occurrence HandleA1995RQ96100004

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • G. Previts B. Merino (1998) A History of Accountancy in the United States: the Cultural Significance of Accounting Ohio State University Press Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Shaub (1988) ArticleTitle‘Restructuring the Code of Professional Ethics: A Review of the Anderson Committee Report and Its Implications’ Accounting Horizons 2 IssueID4 89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Smith (1973) ArticleTitle‘The Revised AICPA Rules of Conduct: To Serve the Public Interest’ CPA Journal 43 IssueID11 963–968

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Wooten (2003) ArticleTitle‘Research about Audit Quality’ CPA Journal 73 IssueID1 48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Yosie (2003) ArticleTitle‘Responsible CARE at 15 Years’ Environmental Science & Technology 37 IssueID21 400–406 Occurrence Handle10.1021/es032631+

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Neill.

Additional information

John D. Neill, Ph.D., CPA, is a professor of accounting at Abilene Christian University and has previously published articles in numerous journals including the Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Accounting Literature, Accounting Horizons, Advances in Accounting,theFinancial Analysts Journal,and theJournal of Accounting, Ethics, and Public Policy. O. Scott Stovall, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of accounting at Abilene Christian University and has published articles in the Journal of Business Ethics, Management Accounting Quarterly, and Cases from Management Accounting Practice. Darryl L. Jinkerson, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of management and chair of the Management Sciences Department at Abilene Christian University and was formerly the Director of Assessment and Measurement for Arthur Andersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neill, J.D., Scott Stovall, O. & Jinkerson, D.L. A Critical Analysis of the Accounting Industry’s Voluntary Code of Conduct. J Bus Ethics 59, 101–108 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3398-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3398-8

Keywords

Navigation