Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Psychological Science

  • Thematic Issue Article: Historical Perspective
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The field of psychology has emphasized quantitative laboratory research as a defining character of its role as a science, and has generally de-emphasized qualitative research and theorizing throughout its history. This article reviews some of the effects of this emphasis in two areas, intelligence testing, and learning and memory. On one side, quantitative measurement produced the widely used IQ test but shed little light on the construct of intelligence and its role in human cognition. On the other side, reductive quantification and experimental constraints limited the investigation and understanding of human memory systems and complex learning throughout the first century of the field’s history. Recent research under fewer constraints has made greater progress in these areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Neisser appears later here for his work on memory and intelligence.

  2. This assumption holds today in many arenas. A more moderate assumption is that all levels are appropriate for investigation, and that feedback from a higher level to a lower may be as informative—and sometimes more informative—as the discovery of an important unit and function at the lower level can be for understanding the higher (see Gottlieb 1992).

  3. See Nelson (2012) for a version of the history and influence of this theory.

  4. My own experience bridged the two orientations: My PhD from UCLA in 1968 was in experimental psychology, essentially behaviorist, specialized in child psychology. My first two publications were in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

  5. This is not the place for reviewing the controversies about this research and its assumed theoretical basis (see Allen and Bickhard 2013 for review and discussion from several angles).

  6. It was assumed that adults do not develop further intelligence, although with increasing age they acquire more knowledge, on the one hand, but presumably lose more mental speed and memory on the other. This assumption is now in question.

  7. If we consider 1920 as the starting point of widespread IQ testing of populations, this implies a 30 point rise in IQs by the present day, or the difference between average and “genius” on some scales.

  8. Publishers of these tests generally deny that they are the same as IQ tests; rather they are said to measure “academic aptitude.”

  9. For those who may have forgotten or never learned these terms, classical conditioning as designed by Pavlov takes place through the association of a stimulus (e.g., a bell) with a desired outcome (e.g., food); instrumental conditioning is the establishment of a habitual action when followed by a reward (e.g., a rat learning to press a lever to receive food. Rats learning to run through a maze to be rewarded with food or water is another example).

  10. The quotation was part of a paper presented at a memory conference in 1978 and published as a chapter in the 1982 book.

  11. “H.M.” is now famous in memory work, his disabilities (the inadvertent result of surgery to relieve epilepsy) having been studied continuously over decades. A good brief account of his case and its impact on understanding memory in terms of systems may be found in Squire and Wixted (2015).

  12. See Moscovitch (1984) for early discussion of these distinctions relevant to infant and child memory.

  13. The revival of interest in Vygotsky’s contributions to social, cultural–historical thinking is especially notable and quite widespread. A return to Piaget’s thinking is less visible, although research in its framework continues in European contexts, but it is always in the background as a model of developmental theory and research program. In the U.S. it was the target of strong criticism during the computational era as cognitive development from a sensorimotor beginning in infancy was deemed inconceivable. Presently interest in terms of a merger of biological and social–cultural–experiential contributions to development has become more prominent.

References

  • Allen J, Bickhard M (2013) Transcending nature and nurture. Cogn Dev 28(2). (Special Issue)

  • Baker-Ward L, Ornstein PA (2013) The coaction of theory and methods in the study of the development of memory. In: Bauer PJ, Fivush R (eds) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 41–64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett FC ([1932]1969) Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Bauer P (2007) Remembering the times of our lives: memory in infancy and beyond. Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer PJ, Fivush R (2013) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1983) Child’s talk: learning to use language. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1959) Review of Verbal behavior by B. F. Skinner. Language 35:26–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman GM (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire: on the matter of the mind. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivush R (2013) Maternal reminiscing style: the sociocultural construction of autobiographical memory across childhood and adolescence. In: Bauer PJ, Fivush R (eds) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 568–585

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fivush R, Nelson K (2005) Culture and language in the emergence of autobiographical memory. Psychol Sci 15:586–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn JR (1987) Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. Psychol Bull 101:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton F (1969) Hereditary genius. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb G (1992) Individual behavior and evolution: the genesis of novel behavior. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb G (2003) On making behavioral genetics truly developmental. Hum Dev 46:337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • James W ([1890]1950) The principles of psychology. Dover Publications, New York

  • Loftus EF (1979) Eyewitness testimony. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler JM (1984) Stories, scripts, and scenes: aspects of schema theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead GH (1934) Mind, self, and society. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Menary R (ed) (2010) The extended mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore DS (2015) The developing genome: an introduction to behavioral genetics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch M (1984) Infant memory, vol 10. Advances in the study of communication and affect. Plenum, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U (1982) Memory: what are the important questions? In: Neisser U (ed) Memory observed: remembering in natural contexts. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, pp 2–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U (1998) The rising curve. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard TJ Jr et al (1996) Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. Am Psychol 51:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (1978) How young children develop knowledge of their world in and out of language. In: Siegler RS (ed) Children’s thinking: what develops? Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 225–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (1993) The psychological and social origins of autobiographical memory. Psychol Sci 4:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (1996) Language in cognitive development: the emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (2003) Self and social functions: individual autobiographical memory and collective narrative. Memory 11:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (2007) Young minds in social worlds: experience, meaning, and memory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (2012) The human nature of the economic mind. Biol Theory 6:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (2013) Sociocultural theories of memory development. In: Bauer PJ, Fivush R (eds) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 87–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K, Fivush R (2004) The emergence of autobiographical memory: a social cultural developmental theory. Psychol Rev 111:486–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin D, Rousset S (2014) The episodicity of memory: current trends in philosophy and psychology. Rev Philos Psychol 5:291–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (2012) Open minds: the making of agency and intentionality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaie KW (1997) The course of adult intellectual development. Am Psychol 49:304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank R, Abelson R (1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1957) Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman C (1904) “General Intelligence” objectively determined and measured. Am J Psychol 15:201–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire LR, Wixted JT (2015) Remembering. Daedalus, Winter:53–67

  • Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (2008) The origins of human communication. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1982) Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (2005) Episodic memory and autonoesis: uniquely human? In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J (eds) The missing link in cognition: origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q (2013) The cultured self and remembering. In: Bauer PJ, Fivush R (2013) Wiley-Blackwell handbook on the development of children’s memory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 605–625

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Nelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelson, K. Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Psychological Science. Biol Theory 10, 263–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-015-0216-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-015-0216-0

Keywords

Navigation