This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
ACSIP. (1996).Mobility of scientific personnel in Russia. Moscow, 80–83 (in Russian).
Baltes, P.B. (1995). Generational and age dynamics in science: Academies for the young? Academies in Transition.Higher Education in Europe, vol. XX (4): 211–219.
Brusilovski, B. (1975).Methematical models in forecasting and organization of science. Kiev: Naukovaja Dumka, 104–122 (in Russian).
Dobrov, G. (1987). Kiev: Naukovaja Dumka (Eds.), 91–101, 110–121 (in Russian).
Gerald of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, (1996). 4 (13) (in Russian).
International Science Foundation (ISF). (1995).1994 Annual Report, Washington, D.C.
Kuhn, T. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kurier of Russian Academy of Sciences. (1995). Electronic journal. Demographic structure of scientific personnel in Russia. Moscow. Nos. 5–6 (in Russian).
Lehmann, N.C. (1953).Age and achievement. Princeton, New Jersey.
Martinson, H. (1995).The reform of R&D system in Estonia. Estonian Science Foundation, Tallinn, 72–73.
Mayer, H.U. (Ed.). (1993).Generationsdynamik in der Forschung. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Messeri, P. (1988). Age differences in the reception of new scientific theories: The case of plate tectonrics.Social Studies of Science, 18: 101–121.
Mikulinski, S. & Nauka, M. (Eds.). (1977).Scientific schools, 115 (in Russian).
Ministry of Statistics and Analysis. Data of the Ministry of Statistics and Analysis, (n.d.) Republic of Belarus.
Nesvetailov, G. (1986).Intensification of academic science. Minsk, Nauka I technika (in Russian).
Pelz, D. & Andrews, F.M. (1996).Scientists in Organization. Productive Climates for Research and Development. New York: Wiley.
Radulescu, D. (1995). Romanian youth and scientific research. Academies in transformation.Higher Education in Europe, XX (4): 220–229.
Rappa, M. & Debackere, K. (1993). Youth and scientific innovation: The role of young scientists in the development of a new field.Minerva, 1: 1–20.
Schweitzer, G.E. (1995). Can research and development recover in Russia?Technology in Society, 17 (2): 121–142.
Simonton, D.K. 1988. Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research?Psychological Bulletin, 104 (2): 251–267.
Stankiewicz, R. (1979). The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance. InScientific Productivity. The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Cambridge University Press. UNESCO. Paris, 191–222.
Stephan, P., & Levin, S. (1993). Age and the Nobel prize revisited.Scientometrics, 28 (3): 387–399.
Stewart, J.A. (1986). Drifting continents and colliding paradigms: A quantitative application of the interests perspective.Social Studies of Science, 16: 261–279.
UNESCO. (1979).Scientific Productivity. The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Paris: Cambridge University Press.
Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R.K. (1972). Age, aging and age structure in science. In M.W. Riley, M. Johnson and A. Foner (Eds.),Aging and Society, vol. 3. A sociology of age stratification, 292–356. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
His research interests include sociology of science, and science and technology policy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nesvetailov, G.A. The aging of research personnel. Knowledge and Policy 9, 86–102 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912438
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912438