Abstract
In this paper, we describe a semiotic programme that proposes an alternative conceptual framework to understand the moral positionalities that people have in socio-material space. The study amalgamates moral character and signs and signification through a discussion of moral choice and value acts in an existential semiotic framework, as laid out by Eero Tarasti. The programme was triggered by a lived experience in a non-place, yielding the concept of semiotic space awareness – i.e., the value acts that work as signs of moral character in people’s socio-material space. It is the moral positioning of a subject in the socio-material and semiotic space in relation to other subjects. People’s positionalities primarily take place in the socio-material space, and the dimensions we discuss focus on how value acts are produced and interpreted in space and place. Our aim is to take the approach used in, e.g., proxemics to a universal metalevel in terms of its key, undivided semiotic ingredients irrespective of cultural variation. We then extrapolate by discussing how these value acts trigger potential tensions and conflicts that can be approached using semiotics as a foundation for analysis. More specifically, the moral character that people portray in their value acts is theorized and applied as an explanatory tool to understand the semiosis and its repercussions in Dasein. We also introduce affordance as an additional dimension in the interplay and modalizations between moral character and moral choice to understand value acts and semiotic space awareness in subjects’ Dasein and Umwelt.
References
Ahlman, Eric. 1938. Olemassaolon” järjellisyys” arvometafyysillisenä ongelmana [Acta Academiae Paedagogicae Jyväskyläensis I]. Jyväskylä: K. J. Gummerus.Search in Google Scholar
Andersen, Peter A., Laura K. Guerrero & Susanne M. Jones. 2006. Nonverbal behavior in intimate interactions and intimate relationships. In Valerie Manusov & Miles L. Patterson (eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication, 259–278. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.10.4135/9781412976152.n14Search in Google Scholar
Arisbe. 2019. The Peirce gateway. https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/ (accessed 26 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Arutyunova, Karina R., Yuri I. Alexandrov & Marc D. Hause. 2016. Sociocultural influences on moral judgments: East–west, male–female, and young–old. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 1334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01334.Search in Google Scholar
Augé, Marc. 2008. Non-places: An introduction to supermodernity. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Barrett, H. Clark, Alexander, Bolyanatz, Alyssa N. Crittenden, Daniel M. T. Fessler, Simon Fitzpatrick, Michael Gurven, Joseph Henrich, Kanovsky Martin, Geoff Kushnick, Anne Pisor, Brooke A. Scelza, Stephen Stich, Chris von Rueden, Wanying Zhao & Stephen Laurence. 2016. Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(17). 4688–4693. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522070113.Search in Google Scholar
Bazerman, Max H. & Francesca Gino. 2012. Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8. 85–104.10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173815Search in Google Scholar
Burgoon, Judee K. 2016. Expectancy violations theory. In Charles R. Berger & Michael E. Roloff (eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, 1–9. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic102Search in Google Scholar
Carr, David. 2003. Character and moral choice in the cultivation of virtue. Philosophy 78(304). 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819103000251.Search in Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1972. Urban renewal and social conflict in Paris. Social Science Information 11(2). 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847201100205.Search in Google Scholar
Clemmer, Richard. 2021. Operationalizing Peirce’s syllabus in terms of icons and stereotypes. Semiotica 239(1/4). 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0152.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Taya R., Abigail T. Panter, Nazli Turan, Lily Morse & Yeonjeong Kim. 2013. Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character. Journal of Research in Personality 47(6). 816–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.009.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Taya R., Abigail T. Panter, Nazli Turan, Lily Morse & Yeonjeong Kim. 2014. Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107(5). 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037245.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Taya R. & Lily Morse. 2014. Moral character: What it is and what it does. Research in Organizational Behavior 34. 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.08.003.Search in Google Scholar
Coverley, Merlin. 2010. Psychogeography. Harpenden: Oldcastle.Search in Google Scholar
Duits, Rufus. 2012. Tarasti’s existential semiotics: Towards a functional model. Semiotica 192(1/4). 577–603.10.1515/sem-2012-0071Search in Google Scholar
Duncan, James S. & Nancy Duncan. 1988. (Re) reading the landscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 6(2). 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1068/d060117.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1976. Peirce’s notion of interpretant. Modern Language Notes 91(6). 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.2307/2907146.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1997. Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition. San Diego, CA: Harvest.Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Robert Shaw & Bransford James (eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology, 67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar
Gieseking, Jen Jack, William Mangold, Cindy Katz, Setha Low & Susan Saegert (eds.). 2014. The people, place, and space reader. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315816852Search in Google Scholar
Greeno, James G. 1994. Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review 101(2). 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.336.Search in Google Scholar
Gray, Kurt, Liane Young & Waytz Adam. 2012. Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry 23. 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387.Search in Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julius. 1966. Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.Search in Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julius. 1980. Strukturaalista semantiikkaa. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Search in Google Scholar
Haldane, John. 2011. Is every action morally significant? Philosophy 86(3). 375–404. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819111000192.Search in Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. 1968. Proxemics. Current Anthropology 9(2/3). 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/200975.Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, Andrew & Les Hutton. 2014. Design for the changing educational landscape: Space, place and the future of learning. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780203762653Search in Google Scholar
Heft, Harry. 1989. Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 19(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00133.x.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin & Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann. 1977. Sein und zeit, vol. 2. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar
Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 2014. Le je-ne-sais-quoi et le presque-rien. La méconnaissance, le malentendu: La méconnaissance, le malentendu. Paris: Média Diffusion.Search in Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in poetic language. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1987. In the beginning was love, Arthur Goldhammer (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kukkola, Jani & Eetu Pikkarainen. 2016. Edusemiotics of meaningful learning experience: Revisiting Kant’s pedagogical paradox and Greimas’ semiotic square. Semiotica 212(1/4). 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0124.Search in Google Scholar
Lagopoulos, Alexandros Ph. 2009. The social semiotics of space: Metaphor, ideology, and political economy. Semiotica 173(1/4). 169–213. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.007.Search in Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The production of space, Donald Nicholson-Smith (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Yuri Mikhailovich. 1989. The semiosphere. Soviet Psychology 27(1). 40–61. https://doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-0405270140.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Yuri Mikhailovich. 1990. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. London: Tauris.Search in Google Scholar
Low, Setha M. 2009. Towards an anthropological theory of space and place. Semiotica 175(1/4). 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.041.Search in Google Scholar
Low, Setha. 2016. Spatializing culture: The ethnography of space and place. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315671277Search in Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power and the battle for hearts and minds. Millennium 33(3). 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031201.Search in Google Scholar
Määttänen, Pentti. 2007. Semiotics of space: Peirce and Lefebvre. Semiotica 166(1/4). 453–461.10.1515/SEM.2007.067Search in Google Scholar
Morris, Charles William. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. In International encyclopedia of unified science, 1–59. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Morse, Lily & Taya R. Cohen. 2017. Virtues and vices in workplace settings: The role of moral character in predicting counterproductive and citizenship behaviors. In Alejo José G. Sison, Gregory R. Beabout & Ignacio Ferrero (eds.), Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management, 761–771. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-6510-8_98Search in Google Scholar
Norman, Donald Arthur. 1988. The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar
Norman, Donald Arthur. 1999. Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions 6(3). 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 2015. The topography of Yuri Lotman’s semiosphere. International Journal of Cultural Studies 18(1). 11–26.10.1177/1367877914528114Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1902. The basis of pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pellegrino, Pierre & Emmanuelle P. Jeanneret. 2009. Meaning of space and architecture of place. Semiotica 175(1/4). 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.049.Search in Google Scholar
Rai, Tage Shakti & Alan Page Fiske. 2011. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review 118(1). 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867.Search in Google Scholar
Rauhala, Lauri. 1985. Ihmiskäsitys ihmistyössä [The idea of man in humanistic practice]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Search in Google Scholar
Sandström, Niclas. 2012. Vaikeuspuhe: Erään itsensä toteuttavan profetian (psyko)analyyttistä semiopedagogiaa [Speech on difficulty: On the (psycho)analytical semiopedagogy of a self-fulfilling prophecy]. Helsinki, Finland: Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Unpublished MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Sandström, Niclas, Anne Nevgi & Suvi Nenonen. 2018. Semiotics of space awareness – moral character and entanglements of power. In Suvi Nenonen, Alpo Salmisto & Vitalija Petrulaitiene (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st transdisciplinary workplace research conference, vol. 64. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology. http://www.twrnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/TWR2018-Proceedings.pdf (accessed 29 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Sannikov, Sergey V. 2020. The three approaches to the semiotics of power. Semiotica 236–237(1/4). 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0025.Search in Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas Albert. 2001. Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation, and prospects. Semiotica 134. 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2001.014.Search in Google Scholar
Silkelä, Raimo. 1999. Persoonallisesti merkittävät oppimiskokemukset [Personally significant learning experiences]. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tarasti, Eero. 2001. Existential semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctt20060dhSearch in Google Scholar
Tarasti, Eero. 2004a. Arvot ja merkit [Values and signs]. Tampere: Gaudeamus.Search in Google Scholar
Tarasti, Eero. 2004b. Ideologies manifesting axiologies. Semiotica 148(1/4). 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2004.009.Search in Google Scholar
Tarasti, Eero. 2009. Semiotics of resistance: Being, memory, history – the counter-current of signs. Semiotica 173(1/4). 41–71.10.1515/9781614516354-010Search in Google Scholar
von Uexküll, Johan. 1982[1940]. The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1). 25–82.10.1515/9783110253436.61Search in Google Scholar
Wąsik, Zdzisław. 2018. Umwelt, Lebenswelt and Dasein seen through the lens of a subjective experience of reality. Sign Systems Studies 46(1). 126–142.10.12697/SSS.2018.46.1.06Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
