This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Armstrong, W. E.: 1951, ‘Utility and the theory of welfare’,Oxford Economic Papers 3, 257–271.
Jaffray, Jean-Yves: 1985, ‘Interpersonal level comparability does not imply comparability of utility differences - A comment on Ng’,Theory and Decision 19, 201–203.
Krantz, D., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A.: 1971,Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York.
Ng, Yew-Kwang: 1984a, ‘Interpersonal level comparability implies comparability of utility differences’,Theory and Decision 17, 141–147.
Ng, Yew-Kwang: 1984b, ‘Expected subjective utility: Is the Neumann-Morgenstern utility the same as the neoclassical's?’,Social Choice and Welfare 1, 177–186.
Ng, Yew-Kwang: 1975, ‘Bentham or Bergson? Finite sensibility, utility functions’,Review of Economic Studies 42, 545–570.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, YK. Interpersonal level comparability implies comparability of utility differences: A reply. Theor Decis 26, 91–93 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134058
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134058