Skip to main content
Log in

The computational metaphor and environmentalism

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Computational Metaphor is an extremely influential notion, and more than any other trend has given rise to the field of Cognitive Science. Environmentalism is at present better formalised as a political movement than as a scientific paradigm, despite significant research by Gibson and his followers. This article attempts to address the difficult problem of synthesising these two apparently antagonistic research paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayer, A. (1982). Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, H., Goetsch, G., Campbell, M., Ebeling, C. (1990). Measuring the Performance Potential of Chess Programs.AI 4(3) (1990).

  • Boden, M. (1979). The computational metaphor in psychology. In N. Bolton (ed). Philosophical problems in Psychology. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. (1990). Has AI helped Psychology? In D. Partridge and Y. Wilks (eds). The foundations of artificial intelligence. Cambridge, England: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, N. (1979). Phenomenology and psychology: being objective about the mind. In N. Bolton (ed). Philosophical problems in psychology. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's Minds. Glasgow: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. (1987). Mind and Brain: One or Two? In C. Blakemore and S. Greenfield (eds). Mindwaves. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstad, J., Halvorsen, P-K, Langholm, T., and van Bentham, J. (1987). Situations, Language and Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). The Mind's new Science, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as pereceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J., Kaplan, G., Reynolds, D. and Wheeler, K. (1969). The change from visible to invisible: a study of optical transition.Perception and Psychophysics 5: 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1987). The Mind-Body Identity Theory. In C. Blakemore & S. Greenfield (eds). Mindwaves. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B., Sparck-Jones, K., and Webber, B. (1986). Readings in Natural Language Processing. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1975). Learning How to Mean. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and Time. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, H. (1990). Beyond the New Paradigm. In J. Patton (ed). The Green Fuse. London: Quartet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise on Human Nature. London: Oxford University Press (1888).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. (1988). The Computer and the Mind. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific Revolutions. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (ed). The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J. (1990a). Consciousness, Self and Will. Dublin City University: School of Computer Applications Working Paper CA-2290.

  • Nolan, J. (1990b). The Growth of Consciousness. Dublin City University: School of Computer Applications Working Paper CA-2390.

  • Patton, J. (ed) (1990) The Green Fuse. London: Quartet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. D. (1973). Small is beautiful. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1987). Minds and Brains without Programs. In C. Blakemore and S. Greenfield (eds). Mindwaves. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1975). Images of Man in Psychological Research. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spretnak, C. and Capra, F. (1986). Green Politics: The Global Promise. London: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (1978). Heidegger. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Still, A. (1979). Perception and Representation. In N. Bolton (ed.) Philosophical Problems in Psychology. Methuen: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W.et al (1990). Detecting Moving Objects,International Journal of Computer Vision,4, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive Thinking. Northampton: Duckers & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding Natural Language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition. Norwood: Ablex.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nolan, J. The computational metaphor and environmentalism. AI & Soc 6, 50–61 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472769

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472769

Keywords

Navigation