Abstract
Within philosophy of medicine it has been a widespread view that there are important theoretical and practical reasons for clarifying the nature of basic health concepts like disease, illness and sickness. Many theorists have attempted to give definitions that can function as general standards, but as more and more definitions have been rejected as inadequate, pessimism about the possibility of formulating plausible definitions has become increasingly widespread. However, the belief that no definitions will succeed since no definitions have succeeded is an inductive objection, open to realist responses. The article argues that an influential argument from philosophy of language constitutes a more fundamental objection. I use disease as an example and show that this argument implies that if a common understanding of disease can be analysed into a definition, then this is a non-trivial definition. But any non-trivial analysis must be viciously circular: the analysis must presuppose that disease can be defined, but this is what the analysis is supposed to yield as a result. This means, the article concludes, that disease and other controversial health concepts do not have analyses grounded in a common language. Stipulative and contextual definitions can have local significance, but the normative roles of such definitions are at the same time limited.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.A. Albert R. Munson M.D. Resnik (1988) Reasoning in Medicine: An Introduction to Clinical Inference John Hopkins University Press Baltimore
C. Boorse (1997) ‘A Rebuttal on Health’ J.M. Humber R.F. Almeder (Eds) What Is Disease? Humana Totowa, New Jersey
T. Burge (1979) ‘Individualism and the Mental’ P. Uehling (Eds) Midwest Studies in Philosophy Minneapolis University Press Minneapolis
T. Burge (1986) ArticleTitle‘Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind’ The Journal of Philosophy 83 697–720 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2026694
T. Burge (1990) ‘Frege on Sense and Linguistic Meaning’ D. Bell N. Cooper (Eds) The Analytical Tradition: Meaning, Thought and Knowledge Basil Blackwell Oxford
E.J.M. Campell J.G. Scadding R.S. Roberts (1979) ArticleTitle‘The Concept of Disease’ British Medical Journal 2 757–762 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.2.6193.757
D. Davidson (1984) Inquires into Truth and Interpretation Clarendon Press Oxford
H.T. Engelhardt (1975) ‘The Concepts of Health and Disease’ H.T. Engelhardt S.F. Spicker (Eds) Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences Reidel Dordrecht
J. Fodor (1987) Psychosemantics MIT Press Cambridge, MA
E. Freidson (1987) Profession of Medicine University of Chicago Press Chicago
S. Guttenplan (1996) A Companion to Philosophy of Mind Blackwell publishers Oxford
G. Harman (1999) Reasoning, Meaning and Mind Oxford University Press Oxford
C. Helman (1984) Culture, Health and Illness Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford
B. Hofmann (2001) ArticleTitle‘Complexity of the Concept of Disease as Shown Through Rival Theoretical Frameworks’ Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 211–236 Occurrence Handle11499496 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvltlGjsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011416302494
B. Hofmann (2002) The Technological Invention of Disease Oslo University Press Oslo
M. Honari T. Boleyn (1999) Health Ecology: Health, Culture and Human–Environment Interaction Routledge New York/London
U. Juel-Jensen (1983) Sygdomsbegreper i praksis Munksgaard Copenhagen
S. Kripke (1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language Basil Blackwell Oxford
D. Lupton (1994) Medicine as Culture SAGE Publications London
J.H. Marinker (1975) ArticleTitle‘Why Make People Patients?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 1 81–84 Occurrence Handle1177270 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE28%2FislOjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/jme.1.2.81
S. Nettleton (1995) The Sociology of Health and Illness Polity Press Cambridge
H. Nordby (2003) ArticleTitle‘Doctor–Patient-Interaction is Non-holistic’ Medicine Health care and philosophy 6 IssueID2 145–152 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024195316365
L. Nordenfelt (1987) On the Nature of Health Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht/Boston/London
L. Nordenfelt (1993) ArticleTitle‘On the Relevance and Importance of the Notion of Disease’ Theoretical Medicine 14 15–26 Occurrence Handle8506537 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB1c7psFM%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00993985
L. Nordenfelt (2001) Health, Science and Ordinary Language Rodopi Amsterdam/New York, NY
L. Nordenfelt A. Twaddle (1993) Disease, Illness and Sickness: Three Central Concepts in the Theory of Health. Studies on Health and Society Linköping University Press Linköping
C. Peacocke (1992) A Study of Concepts MIT Press Cambridge, MA
C. Peacocke (1998) ArticleTitle‘Implicit Conceptions, Understanding and Rationality’ Philosophical Issues 9 43–89
H. Putnam (1962) ‘The Analytic and the Synthetic’ H. Feigl G. Maxwell (Eds) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science NumberInSeriesVol. 3 University of Minnesota press Minneapolis, Minn 358–397
H. Putnam (1975) Philosophical Papers, NumberInSeriesVol. 2 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
L. Resnek (1987) The Nature of Disease Routledge London
J.G. Scadding (1967) ArticleTitle‘Diagnosis: The Clinician and the Computer’ Lancet 2 877–882 Occurrence Handle4168324 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCeD2cnit1Y%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(67)92608-6
W.V. Quine (1953) From a Logical Point of View Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
W.V. Quine (1960) Word and Object Harvard University press Cambridge, MA
W.V. Quine (1969) Ontological Relativity and Other Essays Colombia University Press New York
W.V. Quine (1985) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ A.P. Martinich (Eds) The Philosophy of Language Oxford University Press New York/Oxford
L. Wittgenstein (1953) Philosophical Investigations Blackwell Oxford
Worrhall, J. and J. Worhall: 2001, ‘Defining Disease: Much ado About Nothing?’, in: A. Tymieniecka and E. Agazzi (eds.), Analecta Husserliana LXXII, pp. 33–55
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nordby, H. ‘The analytic–synthetic distinction and conceptual analyses of basic health concepts’. Med Health Care Philos 9, 169–180 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-0002-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-0002-7